• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

General Israel/Palestine discussion thread - Part 4

As with the Reich and so on, aside from the babies and children, pure innocence and ignorance would be rare.
Pure innocence and ignorance is not required. All that is required is that they not be acting under the orders of a commander, wearing an identifiable uniform, and carrying a gun. Those are some other defining characteristics of "combatant" I found when delving into international law.
 
Amal Eid al-Najjar is classified as 'collateral death' to a targeted operation that eliminated terrorists, as a designed IAF mission. She was not the target. Nobody here is gaining any sexual gratification from her tragic demise, despite the claim by planigale of that. (pretty nasty claim, indeed).

HAMAS will avoid mentioning their losses, and only reference the deaths of civilians nearby to their imbedded forces.
The only people who are actually going to physically disarm and confront HAMAS, to take their weapons away from them, is Israel, because they’re not going to give them up voluntarily.

 
What's going on in Gaza with STORM BYRON's "mabool" ?

I have seen no reports about that.
 
Two stories, I want to juxtapose them here ---

#One: IDF recruits at the induction center, interviewed along with their parents and loved ones.
"We will protect our nation from enemies..."

#Two: HAMAS leader declares they will not rest until Israel is no more.

The World's Western culture is in a moment of profound confusion, where moral relativism, ideological extremism, and the fear of being labeled “controversial” have many people retreating from their own principles. Israel, in this moment, exposes that crisis with painful clarity. If you cannot say which side stands for individual liberty and which side glorifies death and destruction, the issue isn’t Israel. The issue is you.

In previous posts, thePrestige made comments regarding the shifting of moral burden to Israel, while excusing HAMAS et al.
This opinion piece was published yesterday, and covers that exact point quite nicely:

“The personal, as everyone’s so ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ fond of saying, is political. So if some idiot politician, some power player, tries to execute policies that harm you or those you care about, take it personally. Get angry. The Machinery of Justice will not serve you here – it is slow and cold, and it is theirs, hardware and soft-. Only the little people suffer at the hands of Justice; the creatures of power slide from under it with a wink and a grin. If you want justice, you will have to claw it from them. Make it personal. Do as much damage as you can. Get your message across. That way, you stand a better chance of being taken seriously next time. Of being considered dangerous. And make no mistake about this: being taken seriously, being considered dangerous marks the difference - the only difference in their eyes - between players and little people. Players they will make deals with. Little people they liquidate. And time and again they cream your liquidation, your displacement, your torture and brutal execution with the ultimate insult that it’s just business, it’s politics, it’s the way of the world, it’s a tough life and that it’s nothing personal. Well, ◊◊◊◊ them. Make it personal.

Quellcrist Falconer
Things I Should Have Learned by Now, Volume II”
 
Pure innocence and ignorance is not required. All that is required is that they not be acting under the orders of a commander, wearing an identifiable uniform, and carrying a gun. Those are some other defining characteristics of "combatant" I found when delving into international law.
Yes, hence Mengele, the Aktion T4 physicians, the scientists of Unit 731 -- all essential -- protected because they were legally civilians
 
Yes, hence Mengele, the Aktion T4 physicians, the scientists of Unit 731 -- all essential -- protected because they were legally civilians
For a start, they were all before the conventions I've been talking about, so at the time they did not have protection as civilians. Secondly, we're talking about direct targeting by military forces in war. Criminals can be prosecuted as criminals, in an ideal world at least, regardless of whether they were combatants or not.
 
Yes, hence Mengele, the Aktion T4 physicians, the scientists of Unit 731 -- all essential -- protected because they were legally civilians
Except they weren't.
After the war trials were held in connection with the Nazi euthanasia programme at various places including Dresden, Frankfurt, Graz, Nuremberg and Tübingen. In December 1946 an American military tribunal (commonly called the Doctors' trial) prosecuted 23 doctors and administrators for their roles in war crimes and crimes against humanity. These crimes included the systematic killing of those deemed "unworthy of life", including people with mental disabilities, the people who were institutionalised mentally ill and people with physical impairments. After 140 days of proceedings, including the testimony of 85 witnesses and the submission of 1,500 documents, in August 1947 the court pronounced 16 of the defendants guilty. Seven were sentenced to death; the men, including Brandt and Brack, were executed on 2 June 1948.
Twelve former members of Unit 731 and associated units were tried by the Soviet Union in 1949 during the Khabarovsk war crimes trials.
You have justified the actions of Israel by saying they are no worse than the actions of Nazis.

I just say there should be the same justice for the victims no matter who the perpetrators* are.

ETA *Israelis or Nazis or Hamas.
 
Last edited:
Journalists? Or affiliates in the service of HAMAS et al?

The evidence for terrorism is a bit thin e.g.
'He posted the Hamas logo to his Facebook page to mark the 31th anniversary of its founding in 2018.'
'In charge of the photography department for the Rawafed educational TV of the Hamas ministry of education in Gaza'
'Worked as a correspondent for radio and TV networks in the southern Gaza Strip'
Even with such flimsy connections to define people as terrorists they still could only identify half of journalists killed as terrorists.
Connections with the Palesitine Authority, nominally the legitimate governing body of Palestine was sufficient to define you as a 'terrorist'.
The people producing this report are an Israeli government funded propaganda organisation.
 
The evidence for terrorism is a bit thin e.g.

Even with such flimsy connections to define people as terrorists they still could only identify half of journalists killed as terrorists.
Connections with the Palesitine Authority, nominally the legitimate governing body of Palestine was sufficient to define you as a 'terrorist'.
The people producing this report are an Israeli government funded propaganda organisation.
It is worth contemplating that the only evidence needed to justify the execution of a Palestinian as a terrorists is;
'He posted the Hamas logo to his Facebook page to mark the 31th anniversary of its founding in 2018.'
'In charge of the photography department for the Rawafed educational TV of the Hamas ministry of education in Gaza'
'Worked as a correspondent for radio and TV networks in the southern Gaza Strip'
 
Journalists? Or affiliates in the service of HAMAS et al?

To post this you must think the IDF targetted journalists; and to justify targetting them you need to blacken them by making them terrorist affiliates. What it actualy does is show what tenuous association is needed for targetted killing of Palestinians.
 
"tenuous association" --- Israel has literally killed tens of thousands of Islamic Jihadists. It's all good.


and


Meanwhile, the State of Israel is expanding the presence of Jews throughout the HolyLand.
Esh Kodesh, Allenby, Givat Harel, Ganim, Har Bezek, Ya’ar El-Keren, Yatziv, Yitav West, Kadim, Kochav HaShachar North, Kida, Mishol, Nahal Doron, Pnei Kedem, Reihanit, Rosh HaAyin East, Shalem, Tamun.

All given formal governmental approvals for their communities to continue existing across Judea and Samaria.

===================
Utbe is presenting many videos of the Gaza inundation.
Looks kinda wet.

Yet, nothing is being done to evacuate these folks. "Leave 'em to suffer in Gaza" seems to be the attitude of the rest of the world. Disgraceful.
 
"tenuous association" --- Israel has literally killed tens of thousands of Islamic Jihadists. It's all good.


and


Meanwhile, the State of Israel is expanding the presence of Jews throughout the HolyLand.
Esh Kodesh, Allenby, Givat Harel, Ganim, Har Bezek, Ya’ar El-Keren, Yatziv, Yitav West, Kadim, Kochav HaShachar North, Kida, Mishol, Nahal Doron, Pnei Kedem, Reihanit, Rosh HaAyin East, Shalem, Tamun.

All given formal governmental approvals for their communities to continue existing across Judea and Samaria.

===================
Utbe is presenting many videos of the Gaza inundation.
Looks kinda wet.

Yet, nothing is being done to evacuate these folks. "Leave 'em to suffer in Gaza" seems to be the attitude of the rest of the world. Disgraceful.
Some how you are missing the point that just because Israel claims they are terrorists doesn't mean they did any more than be employed to clean the streets on Gaza (employed by the Hamas government), were a health worker in a Hezbullah clinic etc. Most of those injured by the booby trapped pagers weren't Hezbullah members, most of those who were were people like first responders, e.g. fire and health workers.

This also is a good illustration of what a cease fire with Israel means, not a cease fire just a slowing in the rate of killings; not a withdrawal from occupied territory, just a partial withdrawal. Then as we see in the West Bank with re-occupation after a bit. Driving out the last few Christian Palestinians; literally a genocide of the Christian population of Palestine is being delivered by Israel.

How many Palestinian refugees has Israel accepted? Perhaps Israel should set a humanitarian example and take in refugees.
 
Last edited:
What a crock.

Israel is not 'driving out' Christians and again, the use of the word 'genocide' is misapplied.

Palestinian refugees number in the millions, and UNRWA was formed to relocate/support them.
How's that been coming along? Not well, to say the least.

Israel is barely acting militarily, compared to prior to this ceasefire.
As it happens, the BYRON natural event is causing more deaths and destruction than the IDF this week.

(The partial withdrawal was arranged as agreed. The Yellow Boundry is mutually defined & Rafah is under IDF control).

This statement doesn't hold up to even the minimal scrutiny of facts:
"Most of those injured by the booby trapped pagers weren't Hezbullah members..."

According to media reports
(Lieber Institute West Point, for example) -- "most of the casualties appear to have been Hezbollah operatives, but a few civilian casualties were also reported..."

++++++++++++++++++++++++


"Leave 'em to suffer in Gaza" seems to be the attitude of the rest of the world. Disgraceful.
 
What a crock.

Israel is not 'driving out' Christians and again, the use of the word 'genocide' is misapplied.

Palestinian refugees number in the millions, and UNRWA was formed to relocate/support them.
How's that been coming along? Not well, to say the least.

Israel is barely acting militarily, compared to prior to this ceasefire.
As it happens, the BYRON natural event is causing more deaths and destruction than the IDF this week.

(The partial withdrawal was arranged as agreed. The Yellow Boundry is mutually defined & Rafah is under IDF control).

This statement doesn't hold up to even the minimal scrutiny of facts:
"Most of those injured by the booby trapped pagers weren't Hezbullah members..."

According to media reports
(Lieber Institute West Point, for example) -- "most of the casualties appear to have been Hezbollah operatives, but a few civilian casualties were also reported..."

++++++++++++++++++++++++


"Leave 'em to suffer in Gaza" seems to be the attitude of the rest of the world. Disgraceful.
Israel is the closest state to Gaza, it is causing the suffering by withholding aid. It held up tents supplied by the UK government for a year.

We have just had an example of how flimsy the definition or terror associates is, another case from Lebanon;
Mohammed Nasser al-Din, 34, was the director of the medical equipment and engineering department at Al-Rasoul Al-Aazam Hospital, a Hezbollah-affiliated facility, at the time of the pager blasts. He said he had a pager to be easily reached for any maintenance needs there.

At the hospital on September 17 last year, he spoke by phone with his wife to check in on their son's first day back at school.
Moments later, his pager exploded.
The blast cost him his left eye and left fingers and lodged shrapnel in his skull. He lay in a coma for two weeks and is still undergoing surgeries to his face.
Now doubt he would be classified as a Hezbollah operative. Hezbollah was effectively a local government it ran social health and education services, being a Hezbollah operative doesn't mean that they weren't civilians.

your source is a US government funded propaganda operation they have just assumed that most of those injured were military operatives, they provide no facts.
 
Last edited:
Egypt is the closest state to Gaza.
Gazans are being stopped from going out through Egypt.
Egypt is not an enemy of Palestinians, yet they refuse to alleviate their distress.
(about half of the population of Gaza would gladly leave through the Sinai if given transit).

◊◊◊◊ Hezbollah.
◊◊◊◊ HAMAS.

 
Egypt is the closest state to Gaza.sGazans are being stopped from going out through Egypt.
Egypt is not an enemy of Palestinians, yet they refuse to alleviate their distress.
(about half of the population of Gaza would gladly leave through the Sinai if given transit).

◊◊◊◊ Hezbollah.
◊◊◊◊ HAMAS.

Not since Israel occupied the border between Egypt and Gaza. Israel completely encircles Gaza. There is no border between Gaxa and Egypt except though an area of Israeli control.

It is interesting that those seeking to defend Israel have too lie.
 
planigale, the Egyptians are refusing to allow the exit of Palestinians.

Egypt is saying that it has to be an open border. Israel is refusing to open it, they will only allow exit from Gaza but not entry into Gaza for aid. Why do you find it necessary to lie to defend Israel? Any usual sense of an open border is that it is not one way.
 
Last edited:
Let me get this straight.

You're claiming that it's Egypt that's stopping people from Gaza from entering. And as evidence you post an article that says that Israel is going to open the border. Is that right?
 
Only the perps are responsible for suffering cry the hard and far left... unless its groups they like and additionally, falsely term "resistance" such as Hamas, the PLO, the LTTE, Viet Cong/the DRV et al -- despite those groups' authoritarian and oppressive tactics and rule over territory

No, it is not freezing in Gaza. "Gaza is freezing" has succeeded "Gaza is starving" as the fake news favorite of the week. It hasn't been colder than 12 degrees in Gaza for the past fortnight, while we are being told that babies are freezing to death.

1765669455499.png

Allowing the likely infiltration of militants and terrorists across recognised borders, whether EGY or ISR is why those borders are restricted. The "open-air prison" myth always and deliberately elided that.
 
Only the perps are responsible for suffering cry the hard and far left... unless its groups they like and additionally, falsely term "resistance" such as Hamas, the PLO, the LTTE, Viet Cong/the DRV et al -- despite those groups' authoritarian and oppressive tactics and rule over territory
The perps in this case are the Israelis who are entirely responsible for the suffering and death of Palestinian civilians and noncombatants.

No, it is not freezing in Gaza. "Gaza is freezing" has succeeded "Gaza is starving" as the fake news favorite of the week. It hasn't been colder than 12 degrees in Gaza for the past fortnight, while we are being told that babies are freezing to death.
No, it is not "freezing" in Gaza. But it is very, very wet. Do you know what the effects of living covered in mud for weeks at a time are?
 
Arth, the only ones responsible for the Palestinian peoples' suffering are their leaders - from the Mufti to Abbas and also Hamas.

In 1947, 70% of Mandatory Palestine was already Jordan. The leaders demanded all of the remaining 30% -- a ◊◊◊◊◊◊ move.
 
It's not a 'border' --- Rafah is a very limited crossing point (for people, not cargo facility), and isn't really designed for aid transfers. Israel is trying to get Egypt to permit evacuating people from the war-torn territory. The Egyptians don't want to give the Gazans an exit route. Keep 'em where they are, is the Egyptian position.
There will be a day when Gaza regains the grandeur and glory of the past. When the Gazans can once again live in Free Palestine, Free of HAMAS rule. For now, pfffft.....

arthwollipot, you claimed that IDF killed 'more HAMAS' (a remark offered sarcastically) and then proceeded to offer information about deaths resulting from a winter storm. Why did you do that?

I just am trying to wrap my head around the way that 'inhumane conditions' are not being alleviated by allowing the people to leave for places where they won't be subjected to such deprivations. It's almost as if Gazans are pawns.
Israel is not 'entirely responsible' for anything related to Gaza.

That'll buff right out. (Remains of HAMAS leader's automobile, slightly damaged by IAF)
 
arthwollipot, you claimed that IDF killed 'more HAMAS' (a remark offered sarcastically) and then proceeded to offer information about deaths resulting from a winter storm. Why did you do that?
Israel caused the inhumane conditions. It's harder to weather out a storm if you have no inside to go to and you're living in a tent with a mud floor.

I just am trying to wrap my head around the way that 'inhumane conditions' are not being alleviated by allowing the people to leave for places where they won't be subjected to such deprivations. It's almost as if Gazans are pawns.
I am trying to wrap my head around how Israel can destroy peoples' homes, farms, infrastructure, livelihoods, health care, schools, and force them to live in tents, then blame them for not moving elsewhere.
 
You didn't answer my question. You posted about "more Hamas terrorists killed. Legitimate targets, all." (said with obvious sarcasm) and then proceeded to mention deaths caused by weather.

I am blaming Egypt for not giving Gazans access to AlArish.
That has to change. The USA and Israel need to apply some leverage.
Egypt wants the natural gas that Israel is extracting from the Chevron fields.
That deal is worth billions of $$.
What is the quid-pro-quo that Egypt is willing to provide for a deal being implemented?
The Americans are trying to arrange a meeting with Sisi & Bibi, and Gaza's future needs to be considered in that context.
Inhumane conditions in Gaza? That's been the case for decades.
Let Those People Go!

 
You didn't answer my question. You posted about "more Hamas terrorists killed. Legitimate targets, all." (said with obvious sarcasm) and then proceeded to mention deaths caused by weather.
Israel caused the inhumane conditions, without which these innocent civilians and noncombatants would not have died. Their deaths are more blood on Israel's hands, and there's already a lot of that.
 
And before anyone else says anything, I absolutely condemn what appears to be a targeted attack on Chanukah festivities taking place on Bondi Beach in Sydney this evening.

 
Nobody wants to hear about 'condemnations' in Australia or anywhere else, at this point. Absolute or otherwise.

"Israel caused the inhumane conditions, without which these innocent civilians and noncombatants would not have died." ---- That is not a proposition which would stand up to scrutiny.
Gaza in winter is always a mess. I've been there in wintertime, it's a real challenge to keep warm and dry, and Gazans are always dying from the cold and horrid conditions. This is typical of Gaza, not something that can be solely attributed to the events of this war.

Despite the typical annual rate of 5,000 natural deaths in Gaza, the HAMAS-generated fatality data provided no accounting for such 'normal' figures.

Anyway, you claimed that the IDF killed them directly. (You said exactly that, in a backhanded sort of way)

Gaza is a base of violent jihadists whose goal is to ‘liberate Palestine.’
That paradigm is undergoing a sea-change.
Get used to it.
 
One, look it up yourself, it's available information pretty much everywhere. I'm not here to spoon-feed you about the natural death rate in Gaza annually. The point remains the same -- many people die in Gaza every winter regardless of anything the IDF does or does not do. It's Gaza, for crying out loud, a horrible horrible place on earth.

Two, of those 23,000, how about if we suppose HAMAS & Co. "Health Ministry" figures are useless for anything-- since they don't disclose their own losses, I'm gonna avoid using their numbers. You should also.

Three, in the face of people who want us dead --
Happy Hanukkah.
 
No acknowledgement of the fact that the death rate in 2024 was 360% above the background rate? What do you think might account for that? I wonder.
 
arthwollipot, the raw numerical values are not of any importance to me. War tends to produce fatalities.
You produced a post (#3905) that was a lie. In that repost of Beckett, you intimated that the 14 listed fatalities were the result of IDF action against them, and 3 innocent uninvolved civilian kids & a baby were just "more Hamas terrorists killed. Legitimate targets, all" --- when in fact, weather conditions led to their demise.
Which I am claiming is weather (hot as hell or rainy& cold& muddy) is actually a routine cause of deaths in Gaza, and has been that way from time immemorial.
Are the crappy conditions of people in Gaza exacerbated by the results of their leaders opening a war? Sure, nobody can argue otherwise. Did the IDF produce incredible devastation in Gaza? You bet.
However, even in quiet times, Gaza sucks to live in.

Now, this is the time for HAMAS to step aside.
If they refuse, there will be further consequences.
Maybe even ethnic cleansing... for their own overall benefit to get them out of the 'unlivable' situation.
It's not beyond the realm of possiblities.

After their homes had been destroyed in the war, Hamas is forcing displaced Gazans in al-Qarara to pay rent to live in tents on the beach
 
Last edited:
Only the perps are responsible for suffering cry the hard and far left... unless its groups they like and additionally, falsely term "resistance" such as Hamas, the PLO, the LTTE, Viet Cong/the DRV et al -- despite those groups' authoritarian and oppressive tactics and rule over territory

No, it is not freezing in Gaza. "Gaza is freezing" has succeeded "Gaza is starving" as the fake news favorite of the week. It hasn't been colder than 12 degrees in Gaza for the past fortnight, while we are being told that babies are freezing to death.

View attachment 67067

Allowing the likely infiltration of militants and terrorists across recognised borders, whether EGY or ISR is why those borders are restricted. The "open-air prison" myth always and deliberately elided that.
Your inhumanity astounds.

Do you know the normal temperature of a baby?

A baby can easily die in a temperture of 12C.

For every 1.0°C of difference in minimum ambient temperature (averaged over the first week of life), the risk of moderate or severe hypothermia was 7.2% higher; for each incremental reduction in ambient temperature of 5.0°C and 10.0°C, the risk of hypothermia increased by a factor of 1.41 (95% CI, 1.40-1.43) and 2.00 (95% CI, 1.96-2.04), respectively. Babies exposed to the lowest quintile of average minimum ambient temperatures had 4.03 (95% CI, 3.77-4.30) times higher risk of moderate or severe hypothermia than those in the highest quintile
The effect of hypothermia will be compounded by starvation. Why did Israel prevent aid organisations bringing baby formula into Gaza?
1765831266269.png
 
Last edited:
HAMAS confiscated the baby food.

They deliberately hid tons of baby formula and children's nutritional shakes in their Gaza warehouses to exacerbate the hunger crisis and use civilian suffering as propaganda against Israel.

The allegations surrounding the availability of baby formula are complex, with different parties providing contrasting information. HAMAS is actively manipulating the humanitarian situation for political gain, leveraging civilian hardship to sway international opinion.
Their evil plans worked to perfection, apparently, as we see planigale posting her allegations, without mentioning HAMAS at all.

Again, I am in favor of alleviating the suffering of Gazans, by their millions, by giving them access to elArish and evacuating the tent camps and makeshift shelters. Half of Gazans would do so in a heartbeat, if given that option.

Holding them against their will in the Gaza Strip is inhumane.

Aid supply is not the main problem.
HAMAS is the problem.
 
HAMAS confiscated the baby food.

They deliberately hid tons of baby formula and children's nutritional shakes in their Gaza warehouses to exacerbate the hunger crisis and use civilian suffering as propaganda against Israel.

The allegations surrounding the availability of baby formula are complex, with different parties providing contrasting information. HAMAS is actively manipulating the humanitarian situation for political gain, leveraging civilian hardship to sway international opinion.
Their evil plans worked to perfection, apparently, as we see planigale posting her allegations, without mentioning HAMAS at all.

Again, I am in favor of alleviating the suffering of Gazans, by their millions, by giving them access to elArish and evacuating the tent camps and makeshift shelters. Half of Gazans would do so in a heartbeat, if given that option.

Holding them against their will in the Gaza Strip is inhumane.

Aid supply is not the main problem.
HAMAS is the problem.
Israeli propaganda. There is no evidence for this.
Whereas direct witness testimony to Israel preventing baby formula entering Gaza.

Let the injured children into Israel, where there are the closest medical facilities. Why won't Israel allow injured children to be treated by the closest medical facilities?

can you provide evidence to support your assertion?
 

Back
Top Bottom