Somebody in C.I.A. was very brave. Perhaps he or she has already secured another job.Why would anyone believe a word Putin says?
CI.A. Says Ukraine Did Not Target Putin’s Home in a Drone Strike, Contradicting Russia’s Claims
Somebody in C.I.A. was very brave. Perhaps he or she has already secured another job.Why would anyone believe a word Putin says?
CI.A. Says Ukraine Did Not Target Putin’s Home in a Drone Strike, Contradicting Russia’s Claims
The International League for Tasteful Interior Decoration ?It's a good line for Putin to feed Trump though, 'Imagine if someone attacked Mar-a-Lago'
The International League for Tasteful Interior Decoration ?
Contradict the PRESIDENT? If Ukraine was to try to attack a Putin residence I'm sure they would do a much better job.Hah the CIA will say whatever the US government tells them to Yeah I got nothing.
Exactly my thinking.Contradict the PRESIDENT? If Ukraine was to try to attack a Putin residence I'm sure they would do a much better job.
The attack is a complete fabrication. Open source intel guys track drone attacks every day in real-time, in both directions, trawling Telegram accounts for reports - mostly from civilians - of drone sightings. We get maps every night showing where they are heading (in both directions). The night of this attack there were exactly ZERO reports from anyone towards Novgorod.Contradict the PRESIDENT? If Ukraine was to try to attack a Putin residence I'm sure they would do a much better job.
Cool, now do Maduro's actual patron, the CCP.I understand* that as part of the secret talks between Trump and Putin, an agreement was reached that Putin wouldn't object to Trump taking over Venezuela as long as Trump didn't object to Putin bombing Ukraine.
* "I understand" IE I made it up.
Russia has objected though.I understand* that as part of the secret talks between Trump and Putin, an agreement was reached that Putin wouldn't object to Trump taking over Venezuela as long as Trump didn't object to Putin bombing Ukraine.
* "I understand" IE I made it up.
After I wrote this, Trump has publicly stated that Ukraine did not attack Putin's residence. Does that mean that the U.S. is delivering Tomahawks again?It is not just rhetoric. It has real life effects. Trump has used it as an excuse to stop delivering Tomahawk missiles.
For Trump, the attack on a fellow dictator and role model makes him realise that he could be a target himself in a war, so he punishes Ukraine by removing one of Ukraine's "cards".
I'm not quite sure of the situation but I believe the announced halt was not a matter of supply, but rather of US oversight (i.e. permission) for their use, as I also gather is the case with ATACMS. I can't find anything publicly announcing whether Trump's declared withdrawal of permission is still in place, but since he now says the cause of it was a false report, I suspect not.After I wrote this, Trump has publicly stated that Ukraine did not attack Putin's residence. Does that mean that the U.S. is delivering Tomahawks again?