• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Theory of Relativity will begin to fall apart in 2016/2017

Status
Not open for further replies.
And you know this how?

Bjarne why would they install an expensive, super-precise atomic clock, if it was being adjusted all the time?

Try to think, OK?

Hans

And what would you use to adjust it all the time with anyway, another expensive, super-precise atomic clock that has to be adjusted all the time itself?


Clearly it's expensive, super-precise atomic clocks all the way down!
 
Its not insulting anyone, but just a warning not blindly to follow the (m)asses

History shows how bad that can go



Yep. Creationists use the same argument to insist "Darwinists" will be proven wrong once and for all any day now.

Sometimes your ideas are in the minority because they're crap.
 
Yep. Creationists use the same argument to insist "Darwinists" will be proven wrong once and for all any day now.

Sometimes your ideas are in the minority because they're crap.


Yep, just blindly following your own musings can be worse than following most others. At least in the latter there is some mutual agreement. However, in Bjarne's case he often just doesn't agree with only himself. So unless the number of people who agree with a certain idea can actually go negative, there's just nowhere lower to go.
 
No we won't.

I predict that by the end of 2017 you will either shift goalposts, claim 'they' are hiding the facts from everyone else, or just plain stop posting.

I suspect that last option is not all that realistic. Chances are he will carry on posting.
As usual.
Having learned nothing.
As usual.
 
And you know this how?

Bjarne why would they install an expensive, super-precise atomic clock, if it was being adjusted all the time?

Try to think, OK?

Hans


This is not what I say, clocks read out are synchronized
 
This is not what I say, clocks read out are synchronized



This is what I say: Dark Flow will never be detected because the buffer overflows are vulcanized.

See? Anyone can spew absurd, scientifically illiterate nonsense completely divorced from reality and insist it's true without any evidence to back it up, just like you.

Why would you need expensive atomic clocks if you are synchonizing the read outs?



Hans



Because his theology requires it to be so, regardless of how absurd the premise is.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the link.
You mean the link I have you weeks ago and that you still cannot understand, Bjarne?
This is the real world of the ACES experiment on General Relativity:
Launch in August 2017.
6 months of calibration (early 2018).
18-36 months of operation = at least early 2019 before data is available to be analyzed.
Scientists write a paper and get it published means that the earliest we can expect the results is late 2019.

Bjarne analyzes the data - never because you are incapable of doing the mathematics or physics involved, e.g. you have still no idea about the orbit of the ISS or how to include it in your dark flow delusion..
 
Bjarne: Launching satellites is nothing to do with your lie about GPS clocks

Rubbish, ...
19 September 2018 Bjarne: Launching satellites is nothing to do with your lie that GPS clocks have to synchronized.

The physical fact is that GPS satellites have the SR and GR adjustments made before launch because they are assigned specific orbits.
 
You mean the link I have you weeks ago and that you still cannot understand, Bjarne?

This is the real world of the ACES experiment on General Relativity:

Launch in August 2017.

6 months of calibration (early 2018).

18-36 months of operation = at least early 2019 before data is available to be analyzed.

Scientists write a paper and get it published means that the earliest we can expect the results is late 2019.



Bjarne analyzes the data - never because you are incapable of doing the mathematics or physics involved, e.g. you have still no idea about the orbit of the ISS or how to include it in your dark flow delusion..



I don't think he actually believes any of this himself. If he did, he'd be chomping at the bit to use the GPS correction data to prove his theology. Instead, he delays and delays, constantly putting the "proof" off to increasingly distant tests and reports. He exhibits not the behavior of someone with a theory to prove but of an "end times" prophet seeking to keep Armageddon just far enough away to bring in donations but not so far away he can't keep people terrified of it.
 
Bjarne: A lie from you about science is completely on topic

Completely derailed
19 September 2016 Bjarne: A lie from you about science is completely on topic.

Knowledgeable people know about the enormous evidence for GR, e.g. the recent detection of gravitational waves. They expect more accurate experiments on GR to give similar results to the existing experiments. Thus your "many have begun to understand that something smells" is a lie.

Deluded people deny the fact that GPS works with satellites in many (incusing polar) orbits. That shows that SR and GR are not measurably affected by your dark flow delusion.
 
Bjarne: Repeated ignorance that GPS clocks are adjusted for SR and GR before launch

Rubbish, do you really believe you can set the speed of a atomic clock ?
Complete ignorance, Bjarne, because that is exactly how SR and GR are accounted for in GPS satellite clocks :jaw-dropp!
GPS: Special and General Relativity
To compensate for the discrepancy, the frequency standard on board each satellite is given a rate offset prior to launch, making it run slightly slower than the desired frequency on Earth; specifically, at 10.22999999543 MHz instead of 10.23 MHz.[16]
If you ever bother to read that Wiki page then you will learn that most of the compensation for sources of error (e.g. atmospheric effects) is done by the GPS receivers.

19 September 2016 Bjarne: Repeated ignorance that GPS clocks are adjusted for SR and GR before launch.
 
This is not what I say, clocks read out are synchronized



9acfc530c6823b219fd66557f09400c3.jpg
 
Yep, just blindly following your own musings can be worse than following most others. At least in the latter there is some mutual agreement. However, in Bjarne's case he often just doesn't agree with only himself. So unless the number of people who agree with a certain idea can actually go negative, there's just nowhere lower to go.

Well, I thought that Bjarne's propensity toward Cognitive Dissonance beggared belief, but what do you call it when a poster posts links to material they purport to contain evidence supporting their view, and it turns to be evidence that refutes their view? Other than Stupid of course!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom