abaddon
Penultimate Amazing
And therefore final synchronize happens in the orbit
Orbits are subject to variations which are unpredictable. Do you agree?
And therefore final synchronize happens in the orbit
Read out is adjusted all the time
And you know this how?
Bjarne why would they install an expensive, super-precise atomic clock, if it was being adjusted all the time?
Try to think, OK?
Hans
Its not insulting anyone, but just a warning not blindly to follow the (m)asses
History shows how bad that can go
Yep. Creationists use the same argument to insist "Darwinists" will be proven wrong once and for all any day now.
Sometimes your ideas are in the minority because they're crap.
No we won't.
I predict that by the end of 2017 you will either shift goalposts, claim 'they' are hiding the facts from everyone else, or just plain stop posting.
Read out is adjusted all the time
And you know this how?
Bjarne why would they install an expensive, super-precise atomic clock, if it was being adjusted all the time?
Try to think, OK?
Hans
Orbits are subject to variations which are unpredictable. Do you agree?
This is not what I say, clocks read out are synchronized
This is not what I say, clocks read out are synchronized
Why would you need expensive atomic clocks if you are synchonizing the read outs?
Hans
You mean the link I have you weeks ago and that you still cannot understand, Bjarne?Thanks for the link.
19 September 2018 Bjarne: Launching satellites is nothing to do with your lie that GPS clocks have to synchronized.Rubbish, ...
You mean the link I have you weeks ago and that you still cannot understand, Bjarne?
This is the real world of the ACES experiment on General Relativity:
Launch in August 2017.
6 months of calibration (early 2018).
18-36 months of operation = at least early 2019 before data is available to be analyzed.
Scientists write a paper and get it published means that the earliest we can expect the results is late 2019.
Bjarne analyzes the data - never because you are incapable of doing the mathematics or physics involved, e.g. you have still no idea about the orbit of the ISS or how to include it in your dark flow delusion..
19 September 2016 Bjarne: A lie from you about science is completely on topic.Completely derailed
Complete ignorance, Bjarne, because that is exactly how SR and GR are accounted for in GPS satellite clocksRubbish, do you really believe you can set the speed of a atomic clock ?
!If you ever bother to read that Wiki page then you will learn that most of the compensation for sources of error (e.g. atmospheric effects) is done by the GPS receivers.To compensate for the discrepancy, the frequency standard on board each satellite is given a rate offset prior to launch, making it run slightly slower than the desired frequency on Earth; specifically, at 10.22999999543 MHz instead of 10.23 MHz.[16]
Yep, just blindly following your own musings can be worse than following most others. At least in the latter there is some mutual agreement. However, in Bjarne's case he often just doesn't agree with only himself. So unless the number of people who agree with a certain idea can actually go negative, there's just nowhere lower to go.
This is what I say: Dark Flow will never be detected because the buffer overflows are vulcanized.
Synchronized with darkflow algorithmic precision to measured predicted error corrected gobbltygook no doubt.This is not what I say, clocks read out are synchronized