The Theory of Relativity will begin to fall apart in 2016/2017

[Bjarne]

Muons are matter they have the same charge as electrons but more rest mass (they are leptons). They are unstable and decay in about 2.2 microseconds in a rest frame.
.

Cows and chicken are anomales, but also different
Cows cannot fly Chicken can sometimes

 

[MRC_Hans]

First tell us what is the difference between matter and muons

• How is matter and space connected?
• How is muons and space connected?

If you don’t know, don’t make such comparison
And if you think you is correct, - then measure muon hitting moving straight north

Uhh, Bjarne, time you looked at reality.

Hans

 

[The Man]

Cows and chicken are anomales, but also different
Cows cannot fly Chicken can sometimes

Cows and chickens aren't "anomales", least not at my dinner table.

Is this actually suppose to be a response to why you just don't look at muon from cosmic rays detection research? Wouldn't it just be easier and cost less poor cows and chickens to admit that you apparently just didn't know if a muon was even considered matter?

 

[halleyscomet]

Cows and chicken are anomales, but also different

Cows cannot fly Chicken can sometimes

That cow pun was such a stretch you might as well be making taffy.

 

[Reality Check]

Bjarne: A list of the usual delusions, e.g. his imaginary "Perihelion Anomalies

Best possible test / evidence for the new understanding of the cause of Perihelion Anomalies, already exist,...

22 September 2016 Bjarne: A list of the usual delusions, e.g. his imaginary "Perihelion Anomalies" !

There are the perihelion precessions of planets (e.g. perihelion precession of Mercury) which is that the position of the perihelion moves along the orbit for each orbit. This is not a delusion that the perihelion is smaller. This is written down as a as a rate of change of an angle such as arcsec/Julian century.

Right now the question is long is it possible to retain delusions when the real world has been pointed out many times?

 

[slyjoe]

So here is an exercise that should be simple - calculate how often the measurement of the orbit and synchronization would have to occur to maintain GPS accuracies.

Bjarne: You never answered this question. Can you?

 

[Bjarne]

Bjarne: You never answered this question. Can you?

Software can do that automatically

A lot can confused those that believe in holy science

For example the planet is not round, - and full of crust anomalies.
Gravity from earth is really different by equator and by the poles.

Now think about what is done to take all that into account for satellites operators.
And how sure can operators be that what they though was satellite orbit disturbances caused by different gravity influence, - instead (in some cases) is “disturbances” cause by very different reasons, - we very soon will learn much more about..

Also ask how gravity anomalies are measured

 

[Dancing David]

Cows and chicken are anomales, but also different
Cows cannot fly Chicken can sometimes

Hi,
that is bizarre to say the least, muons entering the atmosphere and in other places traveling at relativistic speed do not decay as quickly because of time dilation. It shows no preference for your dark flow orientation

 

[halleyscomet]

Software can do that automatically

A lot can confused those that believe in holy science

For example the planet is not round, - and full of crust anomalies.
Gravity from earth is really different by equator and by the poles.

Now think about what is done to take all that into account for satellites operators.
And how sure can operators be that what they though was satellite orbit disturbances caused by different gravity influence, - instead (in some cases) is “disturbances” cause by very different reasons, - we very soon will learn much more about..

Also ask how gravity anomalies are measured

If any of your claims were true, the proof would be in the logs of corrections made to satellites in the GPS system, regardless of those corrections were automated or not.

Is this a fact you simply do not understand or one you choose to ignore?

Your own predictions require an otherwise unexpected 2 to 4 nanosecond variance for satellites in a North / South polar orbit. Find proof of that in the GPS satellite correction logs and you have proof of your theory, or at least an aspect of it.

Why are you so scared of examining the GPS satellite correction data?

Does this web comic reflect how you perceive scientists?

 

[halleyscomet]

So far, this truck is doing a great impression of Bjarne's mythology:

 

[MRC_Hans]

Software can do that automatically

No, it can't. Software only does what you program it to.

For example the planet is not round, - and full of crust anomalies.
Gravity from earth is really different by equator and by the poles.

No. Gravity on the surface is different.

Now think about what is done to take all that into account for satellites operators.

Yes, it's hard work.

And how sure can operators be that what they though was satellite orbit disturbances caused by different gravity influence, - instead (in some cases) is “disturbances” cause by very different reasons, - we very soon will learn much more about..

No, that can be calculated.

Also ask how gravity anomalies are measured

Again, by hard scientific work. You should try it sometime.

Hans

 

[halleyscomet]

Cows and chickens aren't "anomales", least not at my dinner table.

Is this actually suppose to be a response to why you just don't look at muon from cosmic rays detection research? Wouldn't it just be easier and cost less poor cows and chickens to admit that you apparently just didn't know if a muon was even considered matter?

It helps to read him with the right voice:


via Imgflip Meme Generator

 

[MRC_Hans]

Cows and chicken are anomales, but also different
Cows cannot fly Chicken can sometimes

Anomales? Is that something you encounter on a holiday in Bangkok?

Hans

 

[MRC_Hans]

Best possible test / evidence for the new understanding of the cause of Perihelion Anomalies, already exist,

• the flyby anomalies
  

Best possible test / evidence for the new the new understanding of SR, are;

• primary, - that time dilation not is as expected – when moving north. Galileo5,6 and ISS, - will prove that..
• secondary, - these test are also evidence that that dark flow is real, - which mean serveral observations supports each other

,
Best possible test / evidence proving that Relativistic Resistance (RR) against motion is true are

• space probes leaving the solar system will decelerate, as the Pioneer Anomalies already demonstrate,
• matter cannot reach "C" - SOMETHING must prevent that to happen, - that "something" is RR,

Best possible evidence for Dark Flow Acceleration (DFA) are

• Allais effect.
• the speed of stars in galaxies is also caused / driven by that acceleration,
• the formation of solar systems
• Sedna’s strange impossible orbit
• the collapse of galaxies, - and therefore the cause of quasars
• hot Jupiter’s that always is dragged towards dragged towards their mother starts (when the orbit inclination is more or less aligned with DFA)
• In the future better test can be done by letting space probes moves straight north with large speed, these will both decelerate, and even orbits will collapse.

Right now the question is rather how blind is it really possible to be ?

No.

Hans

 

[rwguinn]

Software can do that automatically

A lot can confused those that believe in holy science

For example the planet is not round, - and full of crust anomalies.
Gravity from earth is really different by equator and by the poles.

Now think about what is done to take all that into account for satellites operators.
And how sure can operators be that what they though was satellite orbit disturbances caused by different gravity influence, - instead (in some cases) is “disturbances” cause by very different reasons, - we very soon will learn much more about..

Also ask how gravity anomalies are measured

Speaking of "holy science", Bjarne just transferred the capability to determine and correct anomalies from scientists to the divine computer.
"Oh mighty Cpu, without whom we are nothing...."

 

[halleyscomet]

Speaking of "holy science", Bjarne just transferred the capability to determine and correct anomalies from scientists to the divine computer.
"Oh mighty Cpu, without whom we are nothing...."

And he assumes the scientists never check the logs, despite having been given proof to the contrary.

 

[slyjoe]

Software can do that automatically

A lot can confused those that believe in holy science

For example the planet is not round, - and full of crust anomalies.
Gravity from earth is really different by equator and by the poles.

Now think about what is done to take all that into account for satellites operators.
And how sure can operators be that what they though was satellite orbit disturbances caused by different gravity influence, - instead (in some cases) is “disturbances” cause by very different reasons, - we very soon will learn much more about..

Also ask how gravity anomalies are measured

So you still can't answer the question. Got it.

 

[MRC_Hans]

OK, I have some time, and I did ask Bjarne for this so here goes.

Best possible test / evidence for the new understanding of the cause of Perihelion Anomalies, already exist,

• the flyby anomalies
  

How is that? When we talk about GPS satellites you claim it is virtually impossible to pre-calculate the exact orbit, but when a probe fly-by differs from the calculation somewhere on the sixth decimal, it is suddenly proof of your theory? Please explain exactly how.

Best possible test / evidence for the new the new understanding of SR, are;

• primary, - that time dilation not is as expected – when moving north. Galileo5,6 and ISS, - will prove that..
• secondary, - these test are also evidence that that dark flow is real, - which mean serveral observations supports each other

,

That's not evidence, it is wishful thinking. So far such results only exist on your imagination, remember?

Best possible test / evidence proving that Relativistic Resistance (RR) against motion is true are

• space probes leaving the solar system will decelerate, as the Pioneer Anomalies already demonstrate,
• matter cannot reach "C" - SOMETHING must prevent that to happen, - that "something" is RR,

1) So your discovery is based on a 10th decimal anomaly on a probe on its way through largely uncharted space?

2) Are you serious?? Did you forget e=mc²? That is the explanation of that, supported by observation.

Best possible evidence for Dark Flow Acceleration (DFA) are

• Allais effect.

Unconfirmed.

• the speed of stars in galaxies is also caused / driven by that acceleration,
• the formation of solar systems
• Sedna’s strange impossible orbit
• the collapse of galaxies, - and therefore the cause of quasars
• hot Jupiter’s that always is dragged towards dragged towards their mother starts (when the orbit inclination is more or less aligned with DFA)
• In the future better test can be done by letting space probes moves straight north with large speed, these will both decelerate, and even orbits will collapse.

Pure speculation. I asked for evidence.

Right now the question is rather how blind is it really possible to be ?

Well, for you there seems to be no limit.

Hans

 

[TheAdversary]

Bjarne, what is your objection to relativity, actually?
In Newtonian Mechanics, using the Galilean Transform, the speed of light is considered infinite, and no time dilation occurs. Different
observers will always agree on their clocks.
In Special Relativity the speed of light is considered finite, and the same for all observers. This implies that time and space are mixed
in such a way that this postulate always holds; That of the speed of light being always the same.
So different observers will agree on the speed of light always, but not on their clocks (or odometers).
But this space is still flat. In a Minkowski space, by defining distance properly, you can make everybody happy again.
It is in General Relativity where actual curved spacetime occurs. The Newtonian equivalent for this are the fictitious forces.
You could do the whole thing in a Newtonian way, using Newton's Law of Gravitation.
The differences are mostly unnoticeable except for some corner cases that happen to be exceptionally important to social animals.

 

[halleyscomet]

This promises to be good.