Because those are literally the only two options. You've had it explained, at length, why you are wrong when you claim that Sweden disappeared the two Egyptians so the only possible reason for you to still claim that they did so are that you are either deliberately lying or that you are too dense to understand what has been explained to you.
If you can come up with a third option I'd be glad to hear it, but "I'm right" isn't one, because you've been shown the direct words of the treaty you are claiming that Sweden broke that shows that they did not do what you are claiming.
Let's consider two scenarios:
1. A disaster that kills a thousand civilians, including a party of old age pensioners, a group of young mothers, families that include small children and babies in arms, a large group of civilian police officers, staff and crew, who had zero time to evacuate and zero time to arrange rescue.
You would expect: the senior crew to be singled out for interview.
You would expect the captain and his senior crew to be questioned and charged with negligence until such time they can be exonerated.
You would expect the authorities to be champing at the bit to bring the responsible parties to justice.
Facts:
We know the AB watchman and third and fourth engineers together with a newbie engineer all managed to escape from deck 0 and share the same life raft, complete with wallets, survival suits, passports and warm clothing, even as the same time as the IVth senior officers (the system was that there were two captains, each with two senior officers, who took their watches in turn) managed to get out a 'Mayday' call that was heard.
We know that the senior officers who had left the bridge at 0100 for the replacement watch and some entertainment staff and the bar manager, were intially listed as having similarly having survived, and being on the advantageous upper decks and luxury cabins for many of the others who did survive, it seems reasonable to assume some even shared the same life raft. We know Alexander Voronin and his family, who seemed to be sharing with Captain Piht, escaped despite Alexander's severe health problems, a teenage son and an elderly relative escaped OK, so it is reasonable to expect his peers on that deck to also have done so.
National newspapers quote the head of waterways safety administration Stenmark of confirming that Piht had survived and would be interviewed and had been interviewed.
Next the senior officers' names are removed from the survivors list with no explanation at all.
Two cargo plane chartered by a US company leaves Arlanda circa 29.9/30.9.1994, one to Amsterdam one to Maine, USA, listing nine unknown passengers. US Embassy in Stockholm pays the bill issued by Arlanda for this.
2. Fast forward six years. The 9/11 disaster happens. The CIA believe Muslim terrorists are responsible. It issues 'extraordinary rendition' demands to various western states asking for the removal of persons, who may or may not have had terrorists links or sympathies, into their hands. These persons were removed to US controlled zones such as Guantanomo Bay at the request of the CIA of POTUS Bush.
Two of these included two Egyptian asylum seekers in Sweden who were removed as a result of such a request by the CIA in Cairo, it being in the aftermath of 9/11. A US-hired cargo plane was used to remove the two extra-judicially (contravening the 1998 Rome Treaty which establishes the right to a hearing and other human rights).
This action is a near replay of what happened to the Estonia senior crew six year's earlier, if indeed that is what did happen to them.
To simply say, WHO CARES?
You should care.
