• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Ed The Fascism Checklist, Trump 2025

I'm not quite as pessimistic about the inevitable fall of the US into the 4th Reich for the simple reason that a key requirement that is needed for the movers&shakers who make Fascism possible is not met: profit from going full Nazi.
Historically, the reason why Capitalists love Fascism is because it does away with Unions and provides some kind of slave labor. It also moves wealth from expropriations and conquest to the already too rich, with plenty of crumbs for the henchmen.
But in the US, the Thiels and Musks already have all the money and don't have to worry about Unions. And the US won't be able to plunder foreign countries to a degree necessary to keep the Ponzi Scheme that is every Fascist Regime going.

What we are seeing is less some Nazis trying to take over the US and rule with an Iron Fist over the World, and more opportunists who want to pick the corpse of the US clean while it is still warm, and the bugger off to their Secret Volcano Lair while the survivors go feral in a Mad Max world.
And the starting point is very different, despite the tech oligarchs; the US is, still, a democracy, and has been one for a very long time. This is done out in the open, since the internet and social media will work against them, as well as for them, and the whole world is watching. The fascists of the past could work in mysterious ways their horrors to perform. Trump/Miller can't. That makes it very different. But it is scary, not least since the leaders of the dems seem to have been completely immobilised.
 
It doesn't appear to be true, anyway. Walt Disney Co. (DIS) has been pretty steady lately, sticking between 112 and 118 for months now. The last dramatic change was actually a significant rise, in the middle of May, from 92 to 112.
For the week it fell some:
113.76 USD
−1.10 (0.96%)today
Closed: Sep 19, 7:15 PM EDT • Disclaimer
 
For the week it fell some:
113.76 USD
−1.10 (0.96%)today
Closed: Sep 19, 7:15 PM EDT • Disclaimer
Which doesn't look like a terrible and shocking plunge to me. If you count up all the shares that exist then sure, across all of them that 0.96% drop is a lot of money. But that's true of absolutely any stock and any drop at all. If it went up five cents nobody would declare "stunning zoom in Disney value!!" There's a difference between the price of a stock and the actual worth of a gigantic company.

Even if the Kimmel business does causes losses for Disney it'll be over a long period of time, not within a single week.
 
i’ve become convinced passive investment is propping up the entire market. particularly large companies which benefit much more from it.

just something to think about when it comes to referencing it as a measure of performance
 
Interesting and, frankly scary piece by ChrisArmitage1 (substack via FB).

"I researched every attempt to stop fascism in history. The success rate is 0%. Once they win elections, it's already too late.
In 1933, German conservatives thought they could control Hitler. Two years later, they were being executed in their own homes. I spent weeks researching this question, desperately looking for counter-examples, for hope, for any time in history where people successfully stopped fascists after they started winning elections.
Here's what I found: Once fascists win power democratically, they have never been removed democratically. Not once. Ever.
I know that sounds impossible. I kept digging, thinking surely someone, somewhere, stopped them. The actual record is so much worse than you think ...

The same can be said of every non-democratic regime. None of them have been ended by internal democratic means.
 
And how many of those non-democratic regimes were broken at the ballot box. Even if you want to institute democracy, in a non-democratic polity you're going to have to use non-democratic means.
Actually, in my own country Denmark, a sort of democracy was instituted peacefully in 1849, through consultation between the absolutist king and his government ministers, through the example of other countries, not the least to prevent an 1848-style uprising.
 
It was a peaceful transition here (Sweden) as well, which started in 1809, when much of the power of the king was transferred to the parlament (which consisted of representatives of the four estates; nobility, clergy, burghers and landowning farmers), and ended a little over a century later in universal suffrage.
 
much of the power of the king was transferred to the parlament (which consisted of representatives of the four estates; nobility, clergy, burghers
Hold on, there's an idea: Trump may be willing to shed some of his seized unitary executive powers if he can convinced to share them with burgers. He likes and respects burgers a lot.
 
It was a peaceful transition here (Sweden) as well, which started in 1809, when much of the power of the king was transferred to the parlament (which consisted of representatives of the four estates; nobility, clergy, burghers and landowning farmers), and ended a little over a century later in universal suffrage.
Around 1814 the Danish king at the time had a reasonable chance of also becoming Swedish king, but he declined out of fear that his Danish kingdom would also demand democracy like Sweden …
 
Around 1814 the Danish king at the time had a reasonable chance of also becoming Swedish king, but he declined out of fear that his Danish kingdom would also demand democracy like Sweden …
Scary stuff, democracy! It could have been a misunderstanding, though; maybe they discussed it, but no one knew any "blandinavisk" aka "SASperanto", so they didn't understand each other, and were too emarrassed to admit it😄
 
Scary stuff, democracy! It could have been a misunderstanding, though; maybe they discussed it, but no one knew any "blandinavisk" aka "SASperanto", so they didn't understand each other, and were too emarrassed to admit it😄
He accidentally bought a thousand liters of milk and it went downhill from there.
 
DESIGNATING ANTIFA AS A DOMESTIC TERRORIST ORGANIZATION (The White House, Sep 22, 2025)

For some reason, it doesn't mention the Capitol attack.

Not designated as domestic terrorist organizations: Proud Boys, Boogaloo Bois, Oath Keepers, Patriot Front ...

What is ‘antifa’ and why has Trump branded it a ‘terrorist organization’? (TheGuardian, Sep 23, 2025)
There is no such formal entity called antifa, yet the US president has designated it an ‘anarchist enterprise’, raising concerns from civil liberties experts
Following the murder of right-wing commentator Charlie Kirk at a speaking event in Utah earlier this month, Trump and his allies vowed an aggressive crackdown on leftists, despite the fact that prosecutors are yet to surface any evidence that the shooter was aligned with far-left groups.
(...)
There have been 391 deaths caused by right-wing attacks in the US since 1975, compared to 65 deaths from left-wing attacks, according to the Cato Institute, a libertarian think-tank.
 
"You know, the words that Donald Trump used today, enemy from within, I mean, that's Hitleresque. That is right out of Nazi Germany."
'Hitleresque': Retired Major General links Trump speech to Nazi propaganda (MSNBC on YouTube, Oct 2, 2025 - 7:50 min.)
President Trump spoke today before the nation’s military, touting his decisions to deploy the National Guard to major U.S. cities. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also delivered a series of strange and embarrassing remarks, sparking fresh calls for his resignation. Lt. Gen. Mark Hertling (Ret.) and Maj. Gen. William Enyart (Ret.) join The Weeknight to respond.
 
Definitely, positively not fascism.

The Trump Administration is facing mounting criticism over a sweeping directive that expands the government’s definition of domestic terrorism indicators to include a wide range of political beliefs, with lawmakers and civil liberties groups warning it could be used to criminalize dissent.

The order, which directs the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) to investigate “networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence,” identifies ideological markers such as anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism and anti-Christianity as potential red flags. Rights groups say that language is so broad it risks sweeping in protest movements, advocacy organizations, and critics of the administration. “The goal is to silence people and groups by threatening retaliation,” Rep. Ro Khanna of California told TIME. “These are McCarthy-era tactics. The rise in political violence is real, but attacking free speech is not the answer.”
The White House has rejected claims that the order targets free speech.

“As someone who actually knows what it’s like to be censored, President Trump is a strong supporter of free speech and Democrat allegations to the contrary are so false, they’re laughable,” spokesperson Abigail Jackson told TIME.

“The Trump Administration will get to the bottom of this vast network inciting violence in American communities, and the President’s executive actions to address left-wing violence will start to put an end to any illegal activities.”
 
To add another example of how the US is totally not led by fascists, they've really been leaning into the Befehl ist Befehl rhetoric recently. Dump just announced that he wants the death penalty for anyone advising military servicemen to refuse to carry out illegal orders. I guess they're laying the groundwork for siccing the military on state/city leaders or peaceful protesters.
 
Not fascist.

Coast Guard says swastika is no longer a hate symbol​

  • Writer: The Washington Post

    The Washington Post
  • 55 minutes ago


The U.S. Coast Guard will no longer classify the swastika, an emblem of fascism and white supremacy inextricably linked to the murder of millions of Jews and that more than 400,000 U.S. troops died fighting against in World War II, as a hate symbol, according to a new policy that takes effect next month.



Instead, the Coast Guard will classify the Nazi-era insignia as “potentially divisive” under its new guidelines. The new policy, set to take effect Dec. 15, similarly downgrades the definition of nooses and the Confederate flag, though display of the latter remains banned, according to documents reviewed by The Washington Post
 
To add another example of how the US is totally not led by fascists, they've really been leaning into the Befehl ist Befehl rhetoric recently. Dump just announced that he wants the death penalty for anyone advising military servicemen to refuse to carry out illegal orders. I guess they're laying the groundwork for siccing the military on state/city leaders or peaceful protesters.
Trump always had a favorable view of the Chinese response to the Tiananmen Square protests, he must be planning on such strong actions of a strong leader himself.
 
If it's a hoax, Trump's response is pretty strange. If he knew it was not true, he could after all have told the reporter that it was not. It seems like the kind of thing he'd like to be true, and perhaps he wasn't sure.
 
The coast guard has denied this.
Hoax it seems
The Washington Post article wasn't a hoax, but it was slanted and tendentious. It took 5 minutes of searching to find out that what the Coast Guard plans to do is to stop treating reports of "potential hate incidents" specially. They are now treated as any other report of "potential harassment." Harassment using Nazi symbols or nooses is still a prohibited and punishable offense, and public display of these symbols is prohibited, except in very limited, legitimate contexts.
 
Last edited:
If it's a hoax, Trump's response is pretty strange. If he knew it was not true, he could after all have told the reporter that it was not. It seems like the kind of thing he'd like to be true, and perhaps he wasn't sure.
Or it's the kind of illegal order his regime has form for issuing and the CG leadership is resisting, at least for now.
 
If it's a hoax, Trump's response is pretty strange. If he knew it was not true, he could after all have told the reporter that it was not. It seems like the kind of thing he'd like to be true, and perhaps he wasn't sure.
TBH, I don't think Trump remembers or cares for what a swastika is, let alone what it stands for or its history. Maybe it's a kind of bagel??
 

12 minutes, trump laughs and says he doesn't mind being called a fascist, it's easier than explaining it.

from god's mouth to your ears.
 

Back
Top Bottom