• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged rlopez2's thread to discuss recent history

Originally Posted by rlopez2 View Post
The French were freedom lovers (still are somewhat), but they also have a spine as a people and at some point rebelled big time against their crappy royalty.
Click to expand...

... a few years later took up with a Corsican Emperor who proceeded to conquer most of Europe - including Spain and invade Portugal twice. You might want to read some history

How is all this a conspiracy? Why is this thread not in history or politics?
 
rlopez2 said:
.....bizarre ranting.....



Gringos don't stop to amaze me! Do you consider flying a kite from England which Nazis could have seen in Normandy involvement in WW2?



.....unhinged ranting.....
Click to expand...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Britain

Germany's failure to destroy Britain's air defences to force an armistice (or even an outright surrender) as the first major German defeat in World War II and a crucial turning point in the conflict.

Every time you open your mouth you embarrass yourself. I'm sorry you can't see that.
 
TheSupermeerkat said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Britain

Germany's failure to destroy Britain's air defences to force an armistice (or even an outright surrender) as the first major German defeat in World War II and a crucial turning point in the conflict.

Every time you open your mouth you embarrass yourself. I'm sorry you can't see that.
Click to expand...

Unless he is intentionally doing this in some bizarre form of trolling which involves lying about everything, making racist statements and generally acting weird. He doesn't appear to have any real point other that an ill rational hatred of history and everyone who is not him.

This 'whatever it is' shouldn't be in this forum.
 
Hans said:
That could apply to this whole swine trough of a thread...
Click to expand...

Though you have to be able to parse it and then grasp the point it's trying to make before you can discover that it's garbage.

The whole thing seems to boil down to "Since the USA thinks it's an invincible force for good, how come it hasn't started WWIII against the communist nuclear powers?". This is a strawman of such audacious doltishness that it's hard to believe that's really what he meant.
 
rlopez2 said:
ended? how do you know?
Click to expand...

So let's see your evidence. We know you haven't got any, but let's see you make excuses. I mean if you could get the time frame of U.S. involvement in WWII so laughably wrong, what are the odds that you know something about MKUltra that nobody else does? You can do better than "everything the U.S. Government says is a lie, therefor I'm right". Who am I kidding? You can't do any better than that.
 
Also here is the ultimate defining truth about what I think you are talking about:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties

How well do Britain and the U.S. rank in "involvement"?

Well, places 17th and 18th. Some other interesting data they include in that chart is the total prewar population and deaths as % of the prewar population, which I think should be used as reference to foot such comparisons. This is my basis to demonstrably and measurably show that freedom lovers have been 10 times more genocidal than nazis.

It is definitely not the same to say that 507,000 to 807,000 Greeks died than 450,900 British people or 419,400 gringos, because the UK's pre war population was more than 6 times and the U.S. more than 14 times greater than Griechenland.

I think those charts should separate the European from the Asian part of WW2 not only because of geographic reasons, but the political causes and consequences are different to some extent as well. The causes, "reasons" why Japan started the war can't be compared to Germany's.
 
I see you've moved on from your previous nonsense, refusing to acknowledge questions etc, and now you're claiming Wikipedia lists to be ultimate sources of truth.

Get help.
 
rlopez2 said:
Do you consider flying a kite from England which Nazis could have seen in Normandy involvement in WW2?
Click to expand...
Honestly, how the **** do you think that in any way addresses the fact that the U.S. was involved in combat operations in WWII from December of 1941 to the end? They fought against the Japanese all over the Pacific; they sent USAAF units to England to bolster the RAF; they were hunting submarines in the North Atlantic to support the supply convoys that Great Britain desperately needed; they fought in North Africa and Italy even before the invasion of Nazi occupied France. Hell, Roosevelt signed H.R.1776, aka the Lend Lease Act, in March of 1941. This enabled the U.S. to send much needed military aid to Britain, Free France, China and the USSR.

For you to claim that U.S. involvement only extended over a period of 11 months is hilariously wrong, especially for someone who has asserted his superior knowledge of history. But then you've also claimed to be a biology teacher after making statements that demonstrate your gross ignorance of that subject. In fact, I seriously doubt that you have any sort of university credentials at all.
 
Why do you refuse to answer questions, merely repeating your boilerplate nonsense spamfest "ideas"? Why can't you face criticism and questioning honestly? Are you really that much of a coward?
 
rlopez2 said:
Also here is the ultimate defining truth about what I think you are talking about:
Click to expand...
No, it's not. What you were talking about was that you thought that the U.S. participated in WWII for 11 months. Percentages of casualties has nothing to do with that. It doesn't make you any less wrong about a fundamental fact. It doesn't erase your ignorance.

If you'd like to see an interesting graph, look for military spending during WWII.
 
About "psychologists" that is the most despicable "profession" (to call it something) of them all ... and they are the second most hired "profession" by USG.
Click to expand...
2nd most hired, 39th most hired

https://www.federalpay.org/employees/occupations

Pretty close, I guess.
Click to expand...

Thank you. I think I had read that data most probably from:

https://www.google.com/search?q=site:theIntercept.com+APA+torture

or

https://www.google.com/search?q=site:theguardian.com+APA+torture

I meant by the "intelligence community" as Obama calls them. I once read an article reporting some statistics about most psycho graduates including as their professional options working for them (CIA/FBI/*PDs/NSA,...) Unfortunately I couldn't find it now.

I found this which relates to what I mean:

https://www.apa.org/monitor/apr02/cia

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jul/14/apa-senior-officials-torture-report-cia

All three were implicated in the 542-page report:
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2015/jul/11/american-psychological-association-torture-report
issued this month by former federal prosecutor David Hoffman, who concluded that APA leaders “colluded” with the US department of defense and aided the CIA in loosening professional ethics and other guidelines to permit psychologist participation in torture.

I will keep looking for that article
 
Why are you so desperate to besmirch the psychiatric medical profession?

ETA: Are you a Scientologist?
 
now you're claiming Wikipedia lists to be ultimate sources of truth.
Click to expand...

First notice how you are inserting the adjective "ultimate" and claiming to have read my mind.

Are you also denying wikipedia as a credible source historical data?

What are your sources? U.S. History books?
 
Why are you so desperate to besmirch the psychiatric medical profession?
ETA: Are you a Scientologist?
Click to expand...

OK, I will let you know if you put that gun in the drawer and let me know who your doctor is. I want to know if he was not the screenwriter of "A fish called Wanda" to congratulate him.
 
What are you on about? What doctor do you mean?

My Psychiatrist? I don't have one.

My GP? I doubt you would know her.

Are you actually able to write in a comprehensible form of English? Your posts read like word salad of the worst kind. Like someone has run them through google translate 6 or 7 times until they get to the point where they are barely even English.

I ask you again, why are you so desperate to attack psychiatry? Are you a scientologist?
 
Here for you: life, from the very horse's mouth. Here is USG's "involvement" in WW2:

// __ FDR and Policing the World: Hitler's Threat

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtDxjVCu56E
Click to expand...

Let me translate to plain U.S. English and mindset what the very Adolf Hitler is telling Roosevelt: "keep your place! Keep entertaining yourself with your Monroe doctrine, messing with Latin American countries and minorities in the U.S, killing Native Americans, ... and such things until the time comes for us to get you"

I know such video footage hurt the complex of greatness by gringos they have never heard such "alternate facts" as they would say.
 
Last edited:
MarkCorrigan said:
Why are you so desperate to besmirch the psychiatric medical profession?

ETA: Are you a Scientologist?
Click to expand...

rlopez2 said:
OK, I will let you know if you put that gun in the drawer and let me know who your doctor is. I want to know if he was not the screenwriter of "A fish called Wanda" to congratulate him.
Click to expand...

MarkCorrigan said:
What are you on about? What doctor do you mean?

My Psychiatrist? I don't have one.

My GP? I doubt you would know her.

Are you actually able to write in a comprehensible form of English? Your posts read like word salad of the worst kind. Like someone has run them through google translate 6 or 7 times until they get to the point where they are barely even English.

I ask you again, why are you so desperate to attack psychiatry? Are you a scientologist?
Click to expand...

That kind of read like the ultimate inside joke- one that only the person making it will ever get or think is funny.

Seriously, from having read most of this thread, it seems that folks are trying to have a conversation with someone who just isn't familiar enough with the concept to meaningfully reciprocate.
 
My GP? I doubt you would know her.
Click to expand...
OK, then she can't be that movie's screenwriter

I ask you again, why are you so desperate to attack psychiatry? Are you a scientologist?
Click to expand...

I am not "desperate" to attack psychiatry. Like with politicians I don't give a **** about them. They are impostors not only to me but the whole scientific community. They were the naziest of them all, have always been. "They work with people", mind you. As I said they even make fun of themselves/their profession!

No I am not a scientologist, but I like to see those two kinds of folks go at each other.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom