• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: Greta Thunberg - brave campaigner or deeply disturbed - part 3

Overland crossing points are also commonly called ports of entry. Obviously Greta should have sailed to a port in Israel or Egypt, and transshipped her aid package from there to the nearest border crossing into Gaza. But that would have been a waste of all those donation dollars. The whole point of her boat ride was to make a big production of flouting the blockade, and getting stopped by Israel. There was never even any meaningful amount of aid in play.

It was a scam, my dude. A thunbergskam, if you will.
Why not allow a sea port of entry for aid, actually in Gaza? That way folks dont have to go through Israel and the IDFascists.
 
So check the boat for weapons then let it continue on to Gaza.
Easier to just let the boat unload its cargo in a supervised port, and let it go back where it came from. That way you don't have to search the entire boat for hidden compartments and whatnot.

Things might be different if there were a reputable aid agency raising many tons of aid, willing to work with Israel on the security aspect, and with a good case for delivering straight to Gaza dockside. Note that the Biden Administration tried to set up something along these lines, and failed miserably.

I mean, look: The IDF is not an on-demand inspection service for anyone who wants to take a boat ride to Gaza in the middle of a war. The Scam Flotilla is pretending that's a thing because they're scumbags acting in bad faith, with no intention of ever getting any meaningful amount of aid into Gaza.
 
Last edited:
What was the benefit to Israel, of letting a symbolic aid delivery run the blockade and deliver their cargo without being searched or going through the established ports of entry?

huge potential PR benefit, proving that they don't block aid and food.
And it's not like the amount would have mattered, giving what little this smaller boat could carry.

And it would wash of some of the stink of the attack of Israel on the Freedom Flotilla in 2010
 
Last edited:
... in tiny amounts and incapable to protecting the people in need.
how can you deliver food when you keep on killing the people trying to pick it up?
I'm not getting into major debates on this issue, for reasons you may understand. I merely wanted to point out that Arth's statement was incorrect.
You have your conclusions, and I have mine. Further discussion of them is pointless.
 

there is only one conclusion an honest person could draw.

Listen to the people on the ground, to the aid workers and doctors, see the pictures.



 
Last edited:
Israel is already letting aid into Gaza.
As bait for a trap. Not as aid.

Herd them here, herd them there, bomb them in safe zones, shoot them when picking up flour, funnel them through cattle-style fences and then shoot them, kill all aid workers who could help them, kill all journalists who might tell on the Zionists. La, la, la, glory to Israel!
 
huge potential PR benefit, proving that they don't block aid and food.
Please quantify the hugeness. Please quantify the potential that this hugeness will be realized. Please name the institutions that would manifest this PR benefit. Please describe in practical, material terms, what these institutions would do to benefit Israel, if such a huge potential PR benefit were realized.

And it's not like the amount would have mattered, giving what little this smaller boat could carry.
Exactly. This smaller boat was never intended to matter. It was always intended to appear to matter, to Iran's useful idiots. Don't fall for the Thunbergskam.

And it would wash of some of the stink of the attack of Israel on the Freedom Flotilla in 2010
No it wouldn't. You would not abate your grudge against Israel for that attack one iota, if they'd let this showboat run their blockade.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom