• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Peace President invades Venezuela,/U.S. Forces Capture Maduro

Ok, chicken little.

if i went back into your post history and looked back from nov 2020 to jan 6 and a few months beyond i’m certain i’d find similarly foolish chicken little paranoia style taunts and rethinking assessments.

so you don’t really have the credibility for me to take these kinds of taunts as more than you trying to save face after saying something stupid.
 
if i went back into your post history and looked back from nov 2020 to jan 6 and a few months beyond i’m certain i’d find similarly foolish chicken little paranoia style taunts and rethinking assessments.
Go for it.

Jan 6 was a riot. It was not an insurrection. Which is why basically no one was armed, and the only people killed were protesters.
so you don’t really have the credibility for me to take these kinds of taunts as more than you trying to save face after saying something stupid.
My credibility has nothing to do with the validity of what I said. That stands on its own. You have basically admitted that being wrong will not make you rethink anything.
 
Venezuela used to be a functional country before Chavez.

Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya never were.
Never? That depends on what you think a functional country is, of course; they were not Western democracies, certainly, but non-functional? Both Libya and Iraq have had quite stable periods of growth and development during the 20th century (Iraq had high literacy, strong social services and healthcare, and a thriving middle-class until the war with Iran, and Libya had good education and healthcare systems until Gaddaffi). Afghanistan was well on its way, from the 1930s and onward, to being a very modern, democratic country, women even had extensive rights, including the right to education, employment and voting, until there was a military coup in 1973, and then the Soviet Union intervened in 1979, and ◊◊◊◊◊◊ things up even further.

Not Western democracies, but definitely functional countries. I am not defending the state they are in now, but you dismiss them too carelessly, I think.
 
Go for it.

Jan 6 was a riot. It was not an insurrection. Which is why basically no one was armed, and the only people killed were protesters.

you should probably check out jack smiths deposition. the entire plot is covered in detail


My credibility has nothing to do with the validity of what I said. That stands on its own. You have basically admitted that being wrong will not make you rethink anything.

if you had credibility maybe somebody would buy your dishonest framing.

i think coming into a thread discussing the president illegally attacking venezuela and saying it’s paranoid delusion to think he may trying and steal away an election the same week the special prosecutor charged with investigating the last time he tried to steal away an election saying he was guilty of doing so but he killed the investigation is monumentally stupid. and i have nothing more to say on the matter.
 
And in just over three years, Trump won't be either.

But just as Obama was able to use the military without Congressional approval, so too will Trump be able to. Because it is not actually any different. Presidents get to do that. Maybe they shouldn't, but they do. This wasn't the first time, it won't be the last. Get used to it.

We've come so far from you praising Trump as anti-war. I remember when it was number one on your list of reasons to vote for him.
The best case for Trump is probably what he DIDN'T do.

He didn't get us, or anyone else, into war.

If there's one consistent principle of MAGA, it's having no principles.
 
I wonder at what point we should cut the US out of NATO?

It's foreign policies are now indistinguishable from those of Putin's Russia and Xi's China (though China hasn't invaded neighbors in the past 40 years or so) and that it's clear that Trump will always support Putin anyway, would it not be better to aim some nukes at the US just in case it does decide to go to war with Canada or invade Greenland?
Clearly Trump only respects terror, not law.
 
Last edited:

Trump isn’t too keen on the opposition leader either
The administration could not care less about the people of Venezuela.

Better explanation for their action may be about shoring up support for the Republicans in this year´s midterm elections.
 
JD Vance
@JDVance
You see a lot claims that Venezuela has nothing to do with drugs because most of the fentanyl comes from elsewhere. I want to address this:

First off, fentanyl isn't the only drug in the world and there is still fentanyl coming from Venezuela (or at least there was).

Second, cocaine, which is the main drug trafficked out of Venezuela, is a profit center for all of the Latin America cartels. If you cut out the money from cocaine (or even reduce it) you substantially weaken the cartels overall. Also, cocaine is bad too!

Third, yes, a lot of fentanyl is coming out of Mexico. That continues to be a focus of our policy in Mexico and is a reason why President Trump shut the border on day one.

Fourth, I see a lot of criticism about oil. About 20 years ago, Venezuela expropriated American oil property and until recently used that stolen property to get rich and fund their narcoterrorist activities. I understand the anxiety over the use of military force, but are we just supposed to allow a communist to steal our stuff in our hemisphere and do nothing? Great powers don't act like that.

The United States, thanks to President Trump's leadership, is a great power again. Everyone should take note
 

Back
Top Bottom