Time stamped prediction

Ersby said:
Do you think we can expect a return from dear Mr Lucian? That would be funny.
I was thinking exactly the same thing. Luci had generated such goodwill simply by appearing to be an innocent victim of a drive-by Claus-attack, it was quite educational to see him/her/it dissipate it all in such record time.

Pretty funny, too.
 
Elektrix said:


Ed, did you know that the Pixies have a song called "Ed is Dead"?

-Elektrix

Yes, I wrote that. I also had my own movie, tv show and Horse. The horse died BTW.

I invented the internet even before Al Gore (whose friends call him "Ed").

I hired Randi out of central casting years ago. It was between him and Richard Attenbourgh. Everyone on this board is my sock puppet, except for you.

Anyhoo... Nitchze said it about me ages ago.
 
LOL. Lucianarchy really knows how to place himself in solitude online. I wonder if he's as lonely in real life because of his attitude.
 
thaiboxerken said:
LOL. Lucianarchy really knows how to place himself in solitude online. I wonder if he's as lonely in real life because of his attitude.

(Only quoted TBK's post to bug him.)

Just read this page through and saw I had posted

"And as someone else pointed out at least here banning is only done to prevent damage. Remember the Big Liar has never been banned despite insulting Linda rather nastily for no reason, despite then editing the very post that it insulted Linda in and then lying by saying it had never insulted her!



It is a pattern of behaviour the Big Liar just can't help but keep repeating! I suppose the Big Liar should really be pitied as it obviously can't help itself.


And I posted this on 17th Feb.

...snip... but I do wonder how long it will take them to learn that the Big Liar has no hesitation to lie and attempt to deceive whenever it thinks it can get away with it?"

So less then a month - I think the mods at FTMB deserve a round of applause.

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

(Unfortunately it means the Big Liar will return here sooner or later. :( )
 
My boss Dr.X is going to yell at me tomorrow for being lazy. this will happen between 10am -1pm tomorrow in our lab at location X.


easist million I ever made...


Virgil
 
Ratman_tf said:
Well I, for one, am happy that Luci has found a place where horribly pandering politeness and group hugs supercede any rational discourse.

Suits him/her to a tee. But I doubt they'll go anywhere except in circles over there.

I think the million is safe with that particular prediction... I'll put my arse in a sling and predict there won't be many, if any, voices raised in LA's defence.

As to his/her/its sock-puppets, well they just get killed as the FT MB Mods find them, usually with little or no fanfare... The Mods tend to be pretty efficient in that way. Always assuming the SPs get past initial user moderation.

:D I shall now return to the shadows I came from....
 
Speaking of time stamped predictions, where are all the certified predictions of psychics that warned us of the terrorist act in Spain last week? Luci, why couldn't you have told us about that one, eh? I'd have to say these psychics are failing in their jobs if they are not using their powers to protect human life. Fire 'em all, I say.
 
Hugo Cornwall said:
I think the million is safe with that particular prediction... I'll put my arse in a sling and predict there won't be many, if any, voices raised in LA's defence.

As to his/her/its sock-puppets, well they just get killed as the FT MB Mods find them, usually with little or no fanfare... The Mods tend to be pretty efficient in that way. Always assuming the SPs get past initial user moderation.

:D I shall now return to the shadows I came from....

Oh, no, please stay. I would like to know how the moderators there now think of why I was banned temporarily.
 
CF, darling...

Hazarding a guess, they thought you were just trouble. TBH, if I had been modding, since you emerged punching, I would have cut you off at the ankles for simply ad homiem abuse, then done the background checks. blunt is fine, but basically, being a UK centric board, a small amount of diplomacy in the initial posts would have been nice. Instead, the continued Bliztkreig made you seem like one of the FTMB's more established trolls. Not blinking may be admirable, but there are times to keep ones tongue behind ones teeth
 
I thought it was funny when Lucianarchy asked the board to psychically urge on his football team (Portsmouth?) They were subsequently beaten 5-1 by Arsenal.

Not a word from Lucianarchy about this result.

Shheeesh! A budding Geller with a PhD.
 
malcolmdl said:
I thought it was funny when Lucianarchy asked the board to psychically urge on his football team (Portsmouth?) They were subsequently beaten 5-1 by Arsenal.

Not a word from Lucianarchy about this result.

Shheeesh! A budding Geller with a PhD.
That's because the majority of board posters are skeptics and therefore have an anti-psi effect. In truth the only reasonable outcome in such circumstances is an Arsenal victory.
 
Hugo Cornwall said:
CF, darling...

Perhaps if you could spare the condescending tone.

Hugo Cornwall said:
Hazarding a guess, they thought you were just trouble. TBH, if I had been modding, since you emerged punching, I would have cut you off at the ankles for simply ad homiem abuse, then done the background checks. blunt is fine, but basically, being a UK centric board, a small amount of diplomacy in the initial posts would have been nice. Instead, the continued Bliztkreig made you seem like one of the FTMB's more established trolls. Not blinking may be admirable, but there are times to keep ones tongue behind ones teeth

I'll reiterate two post I made here, just after I was banned:

Officially, I was banned for asking Lucianarchy's gender. But after I had been warned not to do so, I never asked Lucianarchy for his gender again.

I simply did a recap of the situation, and concluded that it was an unresolved matter. And got banned, because I had agreed "not to pursue this matter any further in any way".

The moderator had warned me not to ask Lucianarchy for his gender again, which I didn't do after that. I was not warned never to mention the contradiction again.

I was specifically requested not to ask Lucicanarchy for his gender (although he could ask for my evidence of his gender...). Nobody said that I couldn't mention the Catch-22.

(...)Lucianarchy could mention it, and others too. They were not warned.

Even though they mentioned it after stu neville clearly had stated on 16-02-2004 23:20:
..."any further pursuit of Lucianarchy's gender by anyone will result in a warning".

Operative word is "anyone", Hugo.

There were other issues as well. The moderators did not follow the rules of warning/banning. According to the rules, I should have been PM'd when I was warned. I was not. I should also have gotten three warnings, before I could be banned. I got one. One moderator's decision was overruled by another moderator, but it was impossible for anyone to tell me which moderator I should obey.

It is very clear that the Fortean board is ruled by whim, and not by rule.

"Just trouble", eh? Feel free to comment, Hugo.
 
CFLarsen said:


Perhaps if you could spare the condescending tone.



Whoa. Stand down.

I have read some random threads on the board, and I don't believe that those mannerisms/word choices -- while they may come across that way -- are meant in a condescending way. It's just the way HC expresses himself normally.

I think this whole thing developed because:

(1) They did not know Lucianarchy or his history (a search of usenet in sci.skeptic for luci or one of his 20-30 sockpuppets would give a great deal of insight, btw);

(2) They specifically did not know L's history here with you; and

(3) You came in with guns blazing.

With L, I will admit there is almost no way to hold his feet to the floor without the "in your face" approach. Tenacity is spun by L into persecution.

But because the Fortean board did not know his history, your arrival on the scene was seen as an unwarranted attack; the board reacted accordingly.

But listen to me on this one, please: Let it go.

It was unfortunate that it happened that way, but the controversy is over; L showed his true colors shortly thereafter.

Let it go.

You are here arguing a "letter of the law" point about specifically what they banned you for, when they were reading their pronouncements as "lay off the gender thing" and looking at your lists and recaps as an intentional effort to flaunt their warnings.

You may not have meant it that way; either one of you may be right -- I don't know without re-reading everything. But I do know this: being right or wrong on this one point just doesn't matter.

Let it go.

How about everyone says they regret the misunderstanding and move on with their lives?

N/A
 
You want a banning you can't argue with, go here and just call Bach and/or Xanta a couple of deluded woo-woos.

Every user now identified as a "Guest" in the Scientific Research forum area was summarily banned with no warning. This includes MRC_Hans, whose patience with these guys was legendary.

Warning? Justification? Appeal? They know not these concepts.

Rolfe.
 

Back
Top Bottom