arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena, Pronouns: he/him
Do you want a nanny state? Where is your commitment to Freedom?The problem is our laws about praticing medicine without a licence are way too loose.
Do you want a nanny state? Where is your commitment to Freedom?The problem is our laws about praticing medicine without a licence are way too loose.
You’re not going to unfortunately.The New York Times has a feature titled "The Rise Of The Crunchy Teen Wellness Influencer" (paywall) discussing the boom in the "health-conscious" high school student market and the influencers thatcater tovictimize them. Self-proclaimed adherents of the "Make America Healthy Again" movement.
As if eating disorders and food obsession was not already epidemic.
How the ◊◊◊◊ are we supposed to get through to these kids?
His approval rating is still around 40%, that's a lot of cult members and a proportion of the 60% may just be reluctant to express their support for Trump.Oh, some Trump voters are stupid, calling them all stupid is simply wrong.
A lot chose Trump as the lesser of two evils....and have found out how wrong that is. THat is different then being a CUlt member.
Not at all I think they like what they see, as they are getting exactly what they voted for.Oh, some Trump voters are stupid, calling them all stupid is simply wrong.
A lot chose Trump as the lesser of two evils....and have found out how wrong that is. THat is different then being a CUlt member.
Bobby told Trump she was a good choice - Trump doesn't know her - and that is what he said.MSNBC stated, "While U.S. surgeons general tend to have extensive experience in medicine and public health, Means was described by the AP as a “wellness influencer” who dropped out of her surgical residency program and has no experience in public health administration. The same report noted that Means has supplemented her income by selling “dietary supplements, creams, teas and other products sponsored on her social media accounts.”"
Citation?“There is growing evidence that the total burden of the current extreme and growing vaccine schedule is causing health declines in vulnerable children,” she wrote in an October newsletter.
There's "growing evidence" of all sorts of stuff in my basement. Also a really rare cask of amontillado. Let me show you.Citation?
We're so ◊◊◊◊◊◊.
I know that this was not addressed to me directly, but I found a helpful link from 2002: "Infants today actually receive fewer substances in vaccines that stimulate an immune response than they did 40 or 100 years ago While there has been a substantial increase in the number of routine childhood vaccines over the past several decades, “Parents who are concerned about the growing number of vaccinations recommended for their children may take comfort in knowing that children are actually exposed to fewer antigens -- proteins that stimulate an immune response -- in the vaccines they receive today than in the past,” says Dr. Offit. “Vaccine formulations have been refined and simplified over the years. Although we currently give children more vaccines than in the past, the actual number of antigens they receive has declined significantly. Whereas previously one vaccine, smallpox, contained about 200 antigens, now the 11 routinely recommended childhood vaccines contain fewer than 130 antigens combined.”" This article also noted that infants can respond to 10,000 vaccines at once.Citation?
A Gish Gallop takes almost no thought to set up, yet a long time to refute. It's a lot easier to spout a string of bovine excrement than it is to explain why it is so.Not all Trump voters and not all anti vaxxers are stupid. Some have agile minds but not open minds. How else can we explain the facile (and sometimes detailed) anti vaxxer arguments that take thought and time to rebut? I am not at all cool with kids or anyone else dying of preventable diseases, such as measles, but I think provaxxers have to figure out how to engage better, as I have touched upon before.
I know that your question is largely rhetorical, but I will offer Daniel Dennett's ideas as better than anything I can think of ATM:
"« Dennett synthesizes the steps:
How to compose a successful critical commentary:
- You should attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly, and fairly that your target says, “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it that way.”
- You should list any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
- You should mention anything you have learned from your target.
- Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism."
The road to FREEDUMB! is paved with the bodies of dead children.It's the price of Freedom!