• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Origin of Oumuamua

Kaku, I guess is a physicist, I wouldn't even say he's a futurist as much as just an entertainer. Of course, I was first exposed to Kaku by Art Bell, so I'm biased. Regardless, Loeb is much more of a crank. There's nothing that comes near to earth that he doesn't think is evidence of alien civilization.
 
Kaku, I guess is a physicist, I wouldn't even say he's a futurist as much as just an entertainer. Of course, I was first exposed to Kaku by Art Bell, so I'm biased. Regardless, Loeb is much more of a crank. There's nothing that comes near to earth that he doesn't think is evidence of alien civilization.
Hmm. Makes me wonder. Is the Moon hollow and was it built by aliens?

Damn. Apparently not:

 
Kaku is famous for being a futurist, not for being a scientist.
So you say. However, he trades on being thought of by the general public as a scientist.

According to Wikipedia:


Michio Kaku (/ˈmiːtʃioʊ ˈkɑːkuː/; Japanese: カク ミチオ, 加來 道雄; born January 24, 1947) is an American theoretical physicist, science communicator, futurologist, and writer of popular science. He is a professor of theoretical physics at the City College of New York and the CUNY Graduate Center. Kaku is the author of several books about physics and related topics and has made frequent appearances on radio, television, and film. He is also a regular contributor to his own blog, as well as other popular media outlets. For his efforts to bridge science and science fiction, he is a 2021 Sir Arthur Clarke Lifetime Achievement Awardee.
Like Loeb, he occupies a professorship at a College, albeit one not quite as prestigious as Loeb.
As professors, Kaku and Loeb have a certain academic authority that they use to shill hype and nonsense regarding UFOs or Extraterrestrials. I don't know if either one is more or less "wacky" than the other.
 
So you say. However, he trades on being thought of by the general public as a scientist.
I won't argue with that. Most people don't know what a "scientist" does, and will use that word to label anyone who's science-adjacent. Carl Sagan first and foremost was a science communicator, but he's remembered as a scientist as well.
 
Reminds of the old joke, don't get between Michio Kaku and a Camera. Sure, he's a physicist, possibly a futurist but mostly a publicity hound.
 
Avi's latest blog post delves into conspiracy mongering.

If 3I/ATLAS is a Comet, Why Would the CIA “Neither Deny, Nor Confirm” the Existence of Records on It?

Apparently someone sent a FOIA request to the CIA asking for any records held by the CIA regarding 3I/ATLAS. The request was denied, and the CIA refused to "confirm or deny" the existence of any such records. So this is taken as very suspicious of course, and Avi is insinuating that the CIA must know something about it that they are keeping secret from the public. Otherwise, why would they respond to this FOIA request in such a manner? Well, maybe this is just their way of giving the old bureaucratic middle finger to a nuisance FOIA request because they can. I don't think you can infer anything at all (about 3I/ATLAS) from this response. Maybe you can make inferences about the CIA and their general willingness to share information with the public, but that's it. They're probably happy that people are barking up the wrong tree.

From Avi's blog post:
That this information is treated as sensitive enough to be classified by the CIA is surprising, given that NASA officials stated decisively at a press conference on November 19, 2025 (posted here), that 3I/ATLAS is definitely a comet of natural origin. If this conclusion was clear all along to everyone within government and academia — as NASA officials presented the case, then why would the CIA treat the possible existence of records dealing with a natural comet as sensitive enough to be classified?
Because NASA and the CIA are different agencies with different agendas and missions. Besides, this is NASA's area of expertise, not the CIA's. The CIA also is not always reality based (they are also susceptible to woo-woo from time to time). Infamously, Uri Geller fooled the CIA into believing that he possessed paranormal abilities. Whatever some people at the CIA believe about the comet, frankly it's unlikely that they have any information that isn't known to professional astronomers.
 
Oi, vey! Who the hell thought to even ask the CIA about it? A. we all know their cameras are all pointed down. B. Aren't there some things they could just deny. I'm sure neither confirm nor deny is reflex are they worried that at some point in the future they will be spying on a Chinese moonbase and someone will ask them and the past denial that they look at space will be a problem?
 
Oi, vey! Who the hell thought to even ask the CIA about it? A. we all know their cameras are all pointed down. B. Aren't there some things they could just deny. I'm sure neither confirm nor deny is reflex are they worried that at some point in the future they will be spying on a Chinese moonbase and someone will ask them and the past denial that they look at space will be a problem?
Exactly. If you answer every query with "we can neither confirm nor deny" then it reveals less information if people eventually ask you something relevant. If you pick and choose, then it reveals something when you do give that answer.
 

Back
Top Bottom