It was politically expedient until it wasn't. that's all.And we’re supposed to believe Kash Patel, Pam Bondi, Scott Bessent, Dan Bongino, especially Patel and Bongino who were constantly conspiracy mongering in the podcast space, suddenly don't give a ◊◊◊◊?
Is it possible that they just didn't find what they had expected to find?It was politically expedient until it wasn't. that's all.
Yes, but that doesn't explain why they'd about-face on releasing the files.Is it possible that they just didn't find what they had expected to find?
Is it possible that they just didn't find what they had expected to find?
It does though, because they believed, or at least sold to their audience they believed, that they were going to reveal a list of pedophiles or sex traffickers which of course everyone assumed existed because of the wild, decade-long misinformation campaign about this case. When probably all they found were scattered pieces of evidence, criminal complaints, court documents, deposition transcripts, electronic material that according to Patel are subject to special restrictions, which makes sense. It's not out of the ordinary to safeguard material involving witnesses of sex crimes.Yes, but that doesn't explain why they'd about-face on releasing the files.
When? Your first article refutes the idea that Acosta heard Epstein "belonged to intelligence" as Vicky Ward sloppily reported. The House Oversight Committee transcript of the Acosta interview mostly rehashes old stuff presented in the 2020 OPR report, when Acosta denied the allegation under oath.leaked emails from ex Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak show the very close ties of Epstein with the Israeli security apparatus.
<>
Acosta was absolutely correct when he assumed that Epstein was "Intelligence" or as closely associated as to make no difference.
A third or fourth hand quote from a 2019 New York Post article by Vicky Ward. As Michael Tracey points out, her source was likely Steve Bannon, as he and Ward were collaborating around that time about some book. And Bannon isn't exactly the...To make it even simpler:
Thermal, do you believe that if the Epstein case, including the financial parts and the Intelligence angle (“I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,”) was properly investigated, would it all turn out to be a big nothingburger, or would we find that a lot more crimes had been committed?
"Trump said he asked me to resign, never a member ever," Epstein told Wolff. "Of course he knew about the girls as he asked ghislaine to stop," he added, an apparent reference to Epstein's former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, who is now serving a 20 year sentence for trafficking girls to Epstein.
When? Your first article refutes the idea that Acosta heard Epstein "belonged to intelligence" as Vicky Ward sloppily reported. The House Oversight Committee transcript of the Acosta interview mostly rehashes old stuff presented in the 2020 OPR report, when Acosta denied the allegation under oath.
A third or fourth hand quote from a 2019 New York Post article by Vicky Ward. As Michael Tracey points out, her source was likely Steve Bannon, as he and Ward were collaborating around that time about some book. And Bannon isn't exactly the...To make it even simpler:
Thermal, do you believe that if the Epstein case, including the financial parts and the Intelligence angle (“I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,”) was properly investigated, would it all turn out to be a big nothingburger, or would we find that a lot more crimes had been committed?
well i'm sure there's some other emails they'll release to put those into contextEmail release an attempt to 'smear President Trump', says White House
The White House has responded to this release of emails by House Democrats.
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt says: “The Democrats selectively leaked emails to the liberal media to create a fake narrative to smear President Trump.
"These stories are nothing more than bad-faith efforts to distract from President Trump’s historic accomplishments, and any American with common sense sees right through this hoax and clear distraction from the government opening back up again.”
![]()
New Epstein emails that mention Trump released by House Democrats - live updates
The White House says the victim - whose name is redacted in the emails - is the late Virginia Giuffre.www.bbc.co.uk
There's tons of emails (15000%!) that totally exonerate Trump. But they're all on Hunter Biden's laptop, which is missing. But which will be found! in two weeks. Then everything will be revealed that Trump is a million trillion squillion times innocent (and deserves another Nobel Prize and also, I don't know, how about the blue ribbon from Westminster Dog Show) and that Hillary Clinton was behind everything. Except the stuff Obama did. Also they're the same person. And the gold-painted foam on the walls is real, and so are Melania's tits and Trump's hair. In two weeks. All the proof.well i'm sure there's some other emails they'll release to put those into context
Gold standard proof! Or just gold.There's tons of emails (15000%!) that totally exonerate Trump. But they're all on Hunter Biden's laptop, which is missing. But which will be found! in two weeks. Then everything will be revealed that Trump is a million trillion squillion times innocent (and deserves another Nobel Prize and also, I don't know, how about the blue ribbon from Westminster Dog Show) and that Hillary Clinton was behind everything. Except the stuff Obama did. Also they're the same person. And the gold-painted foam on the walls is real, and so are Melania's tits and Trump's hair. In two weeks. All the proof.
He stuck his nose in all kinds of international efforts, not just Israel's. Those emails actually show that with his communications with Arab leaders too.You are going to ignore the leaked emails?
We now have proof that Epstein was working for Israel, at least part-time, and housing top Israeli intelligence agents in secret.
It is just foolish to claim that this point that Epstein wasn't an Intelligence Asset
Vicky Ward's source for that rumor was almost certainly Steve Bannon, because they were collaborating on a book about the Kushners at the time. That quote about Epstein belonging to intelligence and to "leave it alone", suggesting AG Acosta abandoned the federal charges against Epstein back in 2007 because he was an intelligence asset, would have had to go from Acosta to mystery person to Bannon to Ward, at the very least. And every Epstein chronicler and journalist uncritically ran with that one line rumor from a tabloid article.i think venom is pointing out alex acosta denied saying that, which is fair. maybe he didn't say that, maybe he did and he lied under oath when he denied saying it. maybe vicky ward apparently miraculously guessed he was involved with israelis. there's quite a few self interested liars involved in this conspiracy, hard to tell when one of them is being honest and not. best to look at the supporting evidence.