What to do with prostitutes

Greatest I Am said:
As far as proof, proof, proof.

If I ever get in front of a judge i might supply proof.
Click to expand...

So you're not interested in evidence?

Okay then! Discussion over. :)
 
Gnu Odore said:
Wow, that's it ? That's what we've been waiting for, for six pages ? Prostitution is wrong because it demonstrates the truism that some people have fewer social skills than others ?
Click to expand...

People with lower levels of social skills also have a higher propensity for eating doritos.

Therefore, DORITOS ARE WRONG AND MUST BE BANNED! Doritos are satan!
 
The Atheist said :


Originally Posted by Gnu Ordure
PS : "Men should recognize that paid for sex is a poor second to romantic sex."
Click to expand...


Oh weally, Woger?

Them's fighting words! Sex is sex and money is money. The money's in the drawer, the sex is on the floor.... How is it a "poor second"? Your mind, your therapist or your wife tell you that?

[All the above to be taken in the nicest possible way, of course!]
Click to expand...

Hi , The A.

I think you missed my quotatation marks - that was a quote from GIA which I disagreed with, and I was pointing out to him that, even if some men did think that, it didn't still invalidate paying for sex. As I said :

"Perhaps men do recognize that, but some also recognize that 'no sex' is a poor third to 'paid-for-sex'. ".
 
Gnu Ordure said:
The Atheist said :

Hi , The A.

I think you missed my quotatation marks - that was a quote from GIA which I disagreed with, and I was pointing out to him that, even if some men did think that, it didn't still invalidate paying for sex. As I said :

"Perhaps men do recognize that, but some also recognize that 'no sex' is a poor third to 'paid-for-sex'. ".
Click to expand...

Bugger, I missed the connection! You're dead right - going without is a very poor option. Hell, I'm married and I pay for it every day!
 
Gnu Ordure said:
I also agree that in a perfect world (eg a world in which I wasn't abused as a child), I probably wouldn't need to pay for what most people achieve naturally.
Click to expand...


In a perfect world, no one would have to hire moving companies, their friends would take care of it for them. They wouldn't need to pay for anything as long as they had a friend who was capable of doing it. Get your car fixed for free by your auto mechanic friend, get your compute fixed by your computer dude friend. Yeah right!! The fact is, even friends make you pay for this.

I can't figure out why people are so hung up on paying for sex? Sure, your friend can do the job but let's face it, you get what you pay for. A professional is probably your best bet! :D
 
A professional is probably the best bet for quite a FEW of you.

(Probably for me too, in spite of living with two women... or maybe because of it...)
 
Z said:
A professional is probably the best bet for quite a FEW of you.

(Probably for me too, in spite of living with two women... or maybe because of it...)
Click to expand...

Two women, you say?

Hmm...
 
Greatest I am
The library is full of books depicting romantic love and sex.
I see few books showing pay for sex.
Click to expand...
That would be because you were looking in the fiction section.

Men should recognize that paid for sex is a poor second to romantic sex.
Click to expand...
What happened to practice makes perfect?
 
GIA asked :
Did we agree that romantic sex is better than simply pay for sex.
Click to expand...

and Lonewulf replied :

Sex is sex
Click to expand...

I'm not sure what you mean there, Lonewulf (and/or The Atheist, who said the same thing).

Are you really saying that for you, the experience of sex is much the same regardless of whether your partner is someone you know well and love, and who loves you, or is a stranger that you've paid ?

.
 
Gnu Ordure said:
Are you really saying that for you, the experience of sex is much the same regardless of whether your partner is someone you know well and love, and who loves you, or is a stranger that you've paid?
Click to expand...

While I haven't paid for sex (yet -- still planning that trip to Vegas! :D), I will go out on a limb and say that yes, to me casual sex is every bit as enjoyable as romantic sex, although I wouldn't call them "the same."

Is a romantic candle-lit dinner always better than going out for a nice thick deep-dish pizza? No, they both have their appeal. Sometimes you might be in the mood for one or the other.
 
hi todd, you said :

I will go out on a limb and say that yes, to me casual sex is every bit as enjoyable as romantic sex, although I wouldn't call them "the same."
Click to expand...


I agree, Todd, but my question pertains to paid-for-sex, not casual sex.
 
Gnu Odore said:
Are you really saying that for you, the experience of sex is much the same regardless of whether your partner is someone you know well and love, and who loves you, or is a stranger that you've paid ?
Click to expand...

Insufficient data.

I'd need to make a nice controlled "experiment". Possibly with a bit of wine, and some Barry White.
 
Title: I'm Qualified To Satisfy You


It feels so good
You lying here next to me
Oh, what a groove
You have no idea how it feels
My hands just won’t keep still
I love you, baby
Oh, I love you, I love you, I love you
I just wanna hold you
Run my fingers through your hair
Ooh
Outta sight
Uh-huh, right there, you like it like that
Closer
Come here, closer, close
Oh, baby
Oh, baby
 
If the money comes in the form of a movie and dinner, is it really all that different?
Click to expand...

That would indeed be very similar, wheezebucket, involving as it does a transaction of specific financial value...

In which case I could re-phrase my question:

Are you really saying that for you, the experience of sex is much the same regardless of whether your partner is someone you know well and love, and who loves you, or is a stranger who has sex with you because you've bought her a meal ?
Click to expand...

And I disagree that paid-for-sex is casual sex. Paid-for-sex is a type of casual sex, yes, in the sense that there may be no deep emotional involvement. But casual sex does not have to involve a transaction involving money or goods.

So, my question pertains to paid-for-sex - money or goods (or anything of value).

Lonewulf said :

Insufficient data
Click to expand...

So, can I ask you again, what did you mean when you said "Sex is sex" ?

I'd need to make a nice controlled "experiment". Possibly with a bit of wine, and some Barry White.
Click to expand...


Steady on, Lonewulf, we've only just met...

It's a little early to be introducing me to the seductive charms of the Walrus of Love.



Gnu.
 
Last edited:
Gnu Ordure said:
GIA asked :

and Lonewulf replied :



I'm not sure what you mean there, Lonewulf (and/or The Atheist, who said the same thing).

Are you really saying that for you, the experience of sex is much the same regardless of whether your partner is someone you know well and love, and who loves you, or is a stranger that you've paid ?

.
Click to expand...

Not so much that it's the same, but that neither is inherently "better" than the other.

Paid, casual, never-met-in-the-dark, lifelong partner; the sex can all be equal[ly good or bad!]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom