Another experimental proof is experiments of “spiritualistic séances” using thread with the attached needle method as described in previous posts. After you will succeed in invoking the “spirit” simply ask him “do you have your own awareness/consciousness/soul/spirit/etc?” and then wait for the answer from that “spirit”.
Again, let’s raise a simple question: who is the best expert to decide whether the “spirit” has “awareness/consciousness” or not?
The answer is obvious: the best expert in this question is the “spirit” himself.
So your job is very simple – just ask the “spirit” himself whether he has “awareness/consciousness” or not.
I see a few problems. For one, you might not succeed in the invocation.
For another; should you get this facet of your imagination (or cluster flock) on the line, how do you confirm it?
How do you distinguish one cluster imagining some scene, from two clusters having a conversation?
Donn asked good valid question “
how do you distinguish one cluster imagining some scene, from two clusters having a conversation?
We will explain the criteria which allow to distinguish: 1)
imagining some scene from 2) from two clusters having a conversation.
The criteria are very simple.
During imagining process the main personality has full total control over the objects which are being imagined. As for example, you are imagining a cat and you want this cat to climb into the tree and the same exact moment the cat immediate executes your orders and climbs into the tree, then you want this cat jump off the tree and the same exact moment the cat immediate executes your orders and jumps off the tree, and so on, in other words you have full total control over the object being imagined. The objects which are being
imaged are generated by neuroclusters which contain model/representation of that object, however during
imagining process these neuroclusters obey all commands of the main personality. As for example, you are imagining man X and you want that this man X would say “hello” to you and the same exact moment he says “hello”. Every moment, every action of
imagined object is under the total control of the main personality - that’s how
imagination works.
However under special conditions the main personality might lose the ability to control these neuroclusters which represent the models of objects, and these objects begin to act as autonomous entities/agents. As for example, in your “vision” you see the cat and you want this cat to climb into the tree however the cat totally disobeys your orders. As for example, in your “vision” you see man X and you want that this man X would say “hello” to you, however he totally disobeys your orders and does something what he himself wants to do (for example jumps, runs or whatever else). You have no control over him, he does whatever he wants himself. He acts as independent autonomous agent/entity.
When the main personality is unable to control the behavior of neurocluster – that is the situation when “two clusters having a conversation”. Such scenario happens naturally during dreaming, however special techniques (like for example “spiritualistic séances” using thread with the attached needle method) enable the manifestation of the autonomous neurocluster’s activity during the awakening state.
When communication link is established with the “spirit” (which actually is autonomous neurocluster) the main personality can have meaningful conversation with that autonomous neurocluster. The main personality can ask questions and get the answers which contain the information previously unknown for the main personality – as for example, you have lost your keys and you were unable to find the keys despite you were desperately searching for them over the month, the “spirit” might provide the information where the lost keys are located, you go to check and find the keys – the information from “spirit” is verified as truthful (the underlying mechanism of that was described in previous posts). This “spirit” (==autonomous neurocluster) acts as autonomous entity/agent.
I see a few problems. For one, you might not succeed in the invocation.
Experimental statistical data shows that “thread with the attached needle method” works on pretty high percentage of common people, the success rate might be as high as 80 percent.
If you personally will fail in “spirit invocation” then this is not a problem – just try “thread with the attached needle method” on your friends, acquaintances, family members, etc and you will surely find people who will succeed in “spirit invocation”.
Of course, it is much more impressive when “spirit invocation” succeeds for you personally, because in this case you are able to distinguish with 100% certainty which ideas/thoughts/sentences are coming from “your own mind” and which ideas/thoughts/sentences are “not yours for sure”.
When somebody else (not you) is communicating with the “invoked spirit” then it is less impressive, because you may think “oh well, he is just trying to hoax me”.
As we wrote in previous post, it is very easy to predict in advance the “mediumship” successfulness ratio for the men who have never done “spiritualistic séance” before.
All you need to do is ask that man a simple question: “Do you have high intuition level or not? Please evaluate your own intuition level using the rating scale ranging from 0 to 10”.
A man might not understand what you are asking him, so in that case you need to rephrase the question like this “How often do you have insights/revelations when a solution to some problem comes “out of nowhere” when you have not been thinking about this problem, and solution came itself “out of nowhere”? How often do you have such cases?”
Just search for the people who have “high intuition level”, especially search for the ones who are bragging themselves that they have “very high intuition level”.
Experimental data has confirmed that the higher the self-assigned score of “intuition level” – the higher the probability to succeed in “invoking spirits” during “spiritualistic séance”.
However important warning here – these experiments have undesirable side-effect – after prolonged repeatable experimentation with “spiritualistic séances” you have high risk to induce sleepwalking/MPD incidents for the “medium”, during which the “medium” will be moving/breaking/etc various things in his own house, and when after awakening he finds things broken and scattered around his house, he becomes scared and strongly convinced that “evil spirits have possessed his house” – in more advanced cases this leads to the lunatic asylum.
