Nogbad
Master Poster
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2007
- Messages
- 2,566
I'm voting Ralph Nader. If you don't Know who he is Look up his name in the dictionary. If you don't know of his accomplishments look in the the World Book Encyclopedia. He appears in both 20 years ago. You won't find the other two candidates there. The only text that I have that doesn't have him is school text book on U.S. History, its funny that it does mentions all the things he did but does not mention his name. Its as if our government is taking credit for improvements they were forced to make because of Nader.
Nasty combination!
I looked in the dictionary and didn't see Ralph Nader there. I did see "Nadir - the lowest point in the fortunes of a person". Seems right.
did you look up the prefix Mac, Cain , and Barak.
I voted/voting for Obama. I'm impressed by the fact that he was a professor of Constitutional law. After eight years, I think we need someone who has actually read the Constitution.
There's a difference between reading the Constitution and comprehending it.After eight years, I think we need someone who has actually read the Constitution.
Yeah, they're peas in a pod.Anyway - I would go for Obama since Paul gave up.
There's a difference between reading the Constitution and comprehending it.
Obama may have done the former, but it's pretty clear he hasn't come close to the latter.
If so, then at least Bush's transgressions can be pegged to stupidity. Obama's violations would then have to be attributed to malevolence.Something tells me he is more capable of comprehending the Constitution than our current president.
What in FSM's name are you on about? In what way has Obama "violated" the Constitution?If so, then at least Bush's transgressions can be pegged to stupidity. Obama's violations would then have to be attributed to malevolence.
Well, if you want to get specific, I suppose there's stuff in his Senate voting record that would show his distaste for the rule of the Constitution, but I was referring to things he would do in office.What in FSM's name are you on about? In what way has Obama "violated" the Constitution?
Past, future, whatever. What in FSM's name are you on about?Well, if you want to get specific, I suppose there's stuff in his Senate voting record that would show his distaste for the rule of the Constitution, but I was referring to things he would do in office.
I thought from the context it was fairly evident we were speaking in the future tense with respect to an Obama presidency.
Apparently some people didn't catch that.
Read the thread.Past, future, whatever. What in FSM's name are you on about?
Read the thread.
I'm not a liar.Can you admit you know absolutely nothing about this campaign or the Constitution, and just copied and pasted a Libertarian talking point?
It's easier than thinking, I suppose...Nevermind. I'd rather put you on ignore\