• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Trump's US Threat to Greenland (which belongs to Denmark)

No, not true, but it's easy to overlook, unfortunately:
"Latest data: 5-18 February 2025"
The graphs are based on three polls: Aug 2024, Nov 2024 (post election), and Feb 2025.

By the way, I think that Spain's favorability towards the USA may have fallen even more since February:
DEMONSTRATION ALERT (U.S. Embassy & Consulate in Span and Andorra, June 13, 2025)

The protests are not currently directed against Americans in particular. However, ...
US Buyers Are Leading Foreign Purchasers of Property in Spain (Realty+, April 11, 2025)

'Trump Nightmare' Fuels Record Exodus of Americans to Spain (The Daily Beast, May 15, 2025)
The big U.S. exodus to Spain, Trump blamed (Majorca Daily Bulletin, May 16, 2025)
Oops; missed the italicized part. I'm now corrected.
 
All the real power in America is in the senate.
If all the real power in the US were in the senate, Trump could not rule by personal whim as he does now.

The *intent* was that any presidential order could be checked by the independent senate.
But as with most so called checks and balances in the US, it turns out this was never fully codified and totally ignored the potential for abuse if the senate was staffed with spineless yes men.

At the moment the US senate functions the same way the Russian democracy (or Turkish, or Venezuelan, or Iranian, or North korean) functions. To approve the actions of the local strongman.
 
One environmental factor could be the harshness and remoteness.
I'm afraid that the environmental factor has very little to do with it.
A similar difference can be found in Denmark itself:
Det er kun blevet værre siden 80'erne: Fattige danskere dør flere år før deres rigere nabo (DR.dk, Mar 17, 2024)
Den fjerdedel af mænd med højest indkomst blev i 2021 i gennemsnit 84,2 år. Mens fjerdedelen med lavest indkomst i gennemsnit døde, når de var 73,9 år.
Der er altså en forskel i levealder på 10 år. Tilbage i slutningen af 1980erne var den forskel kun fem år.
It has only become worse since the '80s: Poor Danes die several years earlier than their wealthier neighbors
The 25% of men with the highest incomes lived 84.2 years on average in 2021, whereas the 25% with the lowest income died when they were 73.9.
So there is a difference of 10 years of life. Back in the late-1980s, the difference was only five years.

You find similar differences in most industrialized countries. You also find similar differences between industrialized and colonized countries when the latter aren't characterized by "harshness and remoteness." (By the way, people in the Faroe Islands, whose culture and level of education is much more similar to the other Nordic countries, live approximately as long as Danes.)

And there is this from the USA:
Official US Records Underestimate Native American Deaths and Life Expectancy (Boston University, June 16, 2025)
The study showed that the actual gap in life expectancy between AI/AN and the national average was 6.5 years—2.9 times larger than the number reported in unadjusted official statistics. This life expectancy gap nearly doubled during the study period, increasing from 4.1 years between 2008-2010 to 8 years between 2017-2019. Over the whole 11-year study period, AI/AN life expectancy averaged only 72.7 years, similar to the life expectancy in El Salvador and Bangladesh.
Life Expectancy Rates for American Indian and Alaska Native People Dropped Drastically During the COVID-19 Pandemic (National Council of Urban Indian Health, June 7, 2024)
  • 2021 -> AI/AN pop. 65.2 years
  • 1942 -> All Races/All Sexes US 66.2 years
  • 1943 -> All Races/All Sexes US 63.3 years

I very much doubt that Greenlanders would have lived longer if they were still a hunter-gatherer society, but some of the benefits of industrialized countries have negative impacts on indigenous people. Greenlanders tend to smoke and drink more than Danes, and I think they may exercise less. They got a lot more 'exercise' when they were still hunting seals and whales. The change in diets isn't always healthy. Cancer is a big killer in Greenland. (By the way, Danes drink and smoke more than people in the other Nordic countries.)
There are also many suicides in Greenland, in young men, in particular:
Trajectories, risk factors and risk patterns for suicide in Greenland (SDU, Oct 19, 2023)
The suicide rate in Greenland has been among the highest rates worldwide during the past 40 years with an average suicide rate of 96 suicides per 100,000-person years. The highest rates are seen among people in East and North Greenland and especially young people are at risk.
The most isolated communities are in East and North Greenland. The fairly big cities like Nuuk are all on the (South) Westcoast of Greenland. In East and North Greenland is where you'll find the hunter-gatherer populations. And they have a lot of guns ...
 
Last edited:
But as Dann said, it's the government that has that control. Not the monarch.
In the same way the Dutch government has control over the Dutch Antilles, but not the monarch.
Unlike the US presidency, which is based upon the powers monarchs had in the late 1700's, our monarchies transferred such powers to the elected government.
The Dutch government doesn't seem to have much control over Queen Máxima! :)
 
Last edited:
If all the real power in the US were in the senate, Trump could not rule by personal whim as he does now.

The *intent* was that any presidential order could be checked by the independent senate.
But as with most so called checks and balances in the US, it turns out this was never fully codified and totally ignored the potential for abuse if the senate was staffed with spineless yes men.

At the moment the US senate functions the same way the Russian democracy (or Turkish, or Venezuelan, or Iranian, or North korean) functions. To approve the actions of the local strongman.
Nothing can save a democracy from the ill will of the people. The guarantor of an informed public, a plural and independent free press, crumbled and crashed to the ground once the Fairness Doctrine was revoked by the FCC under Reagan in 1987. Talk radio went nationwide Nazi the next day. Background article.

The ill will of the people, once nurtured in a manner Goebbels would die for, drove the extreme radicalization of the Republican Party. McCain being forced to take that crazy Alaskan woman on his presidential ticket was the watershed moment. His famous but gentle rebuke of a woman who spoke up in a town hall using extremist anti-Obama propaganda had the opposite effect, and acted to distance the now-crazed electorate from moderate candidates from then on.

Trump knows this and his number one enemy is the press. Today, it is as if his followers had brain worms, as if insects possessed by a parasite and driven to self-destructive behavior. There is no fix in sight except their being utterly shocked into awareness that they are totally screwed, which is happening, but which will not reach critical mass until democracy has already ended, which in my view, it already has. I am convinced the 2026 midterms will return a massive GOP victory, perhaps even a totalitarian 90%+ vote count in favor, regardless of real vote counts.

***
Long live Greenland, Canada and Panama.
 
Last edited:
The point of royal families in constitutional monarchies is to represent their respective countries symbolically and only symbolically.

King Frederik can go to Greenland and represent The Danish Realm and be accepted by Greenlanders as the representative of The Danish Realm because he doesn't get to make any policy decisions, i.e. because he has no actual control of anything.
I don't know about Denmark specifically but the the powers are still vested in the Monarch. But these powers are only executed on the advice (ie direction) of the PM. Otherwise, the PM doesn't have any actual powers of their own.
 
I don't know about Denmark specifically but the the powers are still vested in the Monarch. But these powers are only executed on the advice (ie direction) of the PM. Otherwise, the PM doesn't have any actual powers of their own.
I think it works in the same way in Denmark. The monarch signs every law. We have to go back to 1921 when a king decided to execute his powers, and he nearly lost his job. Since then, no monarch has tried his or her luck.
 
If you're thinking of the so-called Easter crisis, it was in 1920:
"Kongen begaar Statskup" (Wikipedia)
"The King stages a coup d'etat"
 
Let's see... Trump's USA, the USA as it is today, has threatened to violate international law and occupy three nations/territories by force in the most bald and disgusting terms, offering no valid justification of any kind.

That same USA is supplying weapons to another settler colonial enterprise in its 75th+ year of constant warfare on civilians, also hellbent on taking land that belongs to others.

The US threat to Greenland is in keeping with the observation that imperialism and ethnocentrism drive American policy, no consideration being now given to international law.
 
Remember Tom Dans, the guy with the company American Daybreak who paid for the dogsled race and apparently financed the conspirators Nuuk?
If you don't, see post 608.

I was watching a Democracy Now! video on YouTube from Aug 6, 2024, Project 2025 Co-Author Lays Out "Radical Agenda" for Next Trump Term in Undercover Video, when a photo of this guy appeared (at 13:50), Paul Dans, and I thought: 'It's amazing how much that guy looks like like Tom Dans, and it turns out that it wasn't a coincidence:
Paul Dans (Wikipedia)
Family
Paul Dans's twin brother Thomas Emanuel (Tom) Dans is a venture capitalist and was an official in Donald Trump's first administration. In 2025, his organization American Daybreak coordinated controversial trips to Greenland by Donald Trump Jr. and Usha Vance, which were criticized for their promotion of the second Trump administration's Greenland policy.

This is how the same Wikipedia page describes Paul Dans's role in Project 2025:
Paull Dans: Project 2025
Dans helped to launch Project 2025 in April 2022 and led it until August 2024. Dans described the project as "systematically preparing to march into office and bring a new army [of] aligned, trained, and essentially weaponized conservatives ready to do battle against the deep state".
In 2023, Dans stated that Project 2025 had a "great" relationship with President Donald Trump. However, RealClearPolitics reported that Dans had, in fact, repeatedly clashed with the 2024 Trump campaign.
On July 30, 2024, Dans announced he was stepping down from his position as project director, the following month following public criticism by Trump. However, RealClearPolitics reported that Dans was terminated from his position after Heritage had concluded an investigation into his alleged abusive and demeaning behavior, especially towards women. His request for a $3.1 million lump sum, following the termination of his tenure, was rejected

Trump says he only hires the 'best people.' His record suggests otherwise. (MSNBC, Oct 25, 2024)
 
Last edited:
If all the real power in the US were in the senate, Trump could not rule by personal whim as he does now.

The *intent* was that any presidential order could be checked by the independent senate.
But as with most so called checks and balances in the US, it turns out this was never fully codified and totally ignored the potential for abuse if the senate was staffed with spineless yes men.

At the moment the US senate functions the same way the Russian democracy (or Turkish, or Venezuelan, or Iranian, or North korean) functions. To approve the actions of the local strongman.
Congress isn't even that functional.
 
I think it works in the same way in Denmark. The monarch signs every law. We have to go back to 1921 when a king decided to execute his powers, and he nearly lost his job. Since then, no monarch has tried his or her luck.
And in Canada for that matter. Except per Google:
Exceptions:
In exceptional circumstances, such as a government losing the confidence of the House and being unable to form a new government, the Governor General might have some limited discretion, but this is rare and would likely involve extensive consultation.
 
And in Canada for that matter. Except per Google:
We have a similar rule. After an election the king appoints a party leader to try to form a new government. But there are rules about which order is used to select the party leader (largest number of seats, or something similar, I can’t remember exactly), and it would be highly irregular if a party leader is selected out of order.
 
And in Canada for that matter. Except per Google:
Canada is probably like Australia. The GG has fully autonomous powers such as the power to block legislation or to dismiss the cabinet. Of course, if they used these powers against the advice of the PM then you could be pretty sure that the PM would call His Majesty and have the GG removed (unless the GG dismissed the PM as happened controversially in Australia in 1975).
 
The USA should take over Denmark instead. They would then automatically gain control of Greenland.
Denmark also controls the Baltic Sea, which is very important for stopping Russian terrorism in the area.

Donald Trump cannot suffer from frontal lobe dementia because he has no frontal lobes.
Thats's why he makes Putin great again.

Stop communism.
 

Back
Top Bottom