• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Trump's Second Term

Jack by the hedge said:
You haven't seen his FDR yet.
Click to expand...
He doesn't have a wheelchair yet, he has eight illegals carry him around. With eight more ready to spell the first eight every eight feet or when the human beasts of burden are exhausted, or when they start throwing up having to listen to him.
 
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY FIRST, NO MORE PAYMENTS WILL BE MADE BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO STATES FOR THEIR CORRUPT CRIMINAL PROTECTION CENTERS KNOWN AS SANCTUARY CITIES. ALL THEY DO IS BREED CRIME AND VIOLENCE! If States want them, they will have to pay for them! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!
 
Andy_Ross said:
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY FIRST, NO MORE PAYMENTS WILL BE MADE BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO STATES FOR THEIR CORRUPT CRIMINAL PROTECTION CENTERS KNOWN AS SANCTUARY CITIES...
Click to expand...

How can something as far-reaching as this happen merely on trump's say so? Just by trump issuing an executive order? Do we no longer have laws? A Congress?
The latest move comes after a federal judge ruled the executive order, which would have paused funding for more than 30 sanctuary cities, was likely unconstitutional. U.S. District Judge William Orrick, who was appointed by former President Obama, extended his preliminary injunction in August after the administration did little to object to the original order. The Hill article link
Click to expand...

From the earlier ruling:
Orrick ruled that the counties and cities are likely to succeed on their claims that Trump’s order usurps Congress’s power of the purse, is unconstitutionally vague in violation of the Fifth Amendment and runs afoul of the 10th Amendment by commandeering local officials into enforcing federal immigration law. The Hill article link
Click to expand...
 
Andy_Ross said:
It looks like he's added more gold blobs to the wall between the windows since the last redecorating a couple of months ago.

View attachment 68066
Click to expand...

Man, he looks like ◊◊◊◊. Frumpy doesn't even begin to explain it. This is how my dad would look if I forced him to go to a Trump museum.
Andy_Ross said:
"I know the President will be happy that I repeat that."
Click to expand...

Yes, RFK, you're a good boy. Go lay by your dish.
 
Ziggurat said:
It's a coup when the democratically elected president starts enacting the policies that voters elected him to enact? Yeah, no. That's Orwellian abuse of language right there.
Click to expand...
It is when the president the voters vote for, instituting policies the voters want that goes against the Constitution. Shall we reenact slavery, just because 48% of those who bother to vote want us to? The Constitution is the Law of the Land. Not the voters. Not the president. Not Congress. Not the Supreme Court. The Constitution is the law of the Land. So yes. It is definitely a coup of the "democratically elected president" starts enacting the policies that a minority (48%), or even if the majority of voters (51%, which Trump clearly did NOT have), enacts policies those 48% minority of voters elected him to enact if it violates any part of the Constitution.

You're very argument is what is Orwellian.

Seems like you found a word that you think sounds smart and latched onto it. I don't know why conservatives are so obsessed with latching onto words and phrases to way over use them. Like "snowflake." "Libs." "Tears." "Tidepods." "TDS." Anything to do with "Millennials" while simultaneously not understanding what a "millennial" even is. Could you maybe use your own words to formulate your own argument?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom