Remember when Trump wondered why they couldn't just shoot migrants? Cultists gonna cult.You have an amazing ability to post in ways that make you appear quite callous. Were you born with this ability, or do you have to work hard on it?
Remember when Trump wondered why they couldn't just shoot migrants? Cultists gonna cult.You have an amazing ability to post in ways that make you appear quite callous. Were you born with this ability, or do you have to work hard on it?
Please post a link. Hopefully not to a DHS narrative.Our supersleuth at the JFC account failed to mention that Grantchev was ordered removed in January of 2023 and was arrested pursuant to a warrant of arrest then detained pending removal proceedings. Information that was made public days before JFC decided to manufacture that narrative.
Also the cruelty is the point.Remember when Trump wondered why they couldn't just shoot migrants? Cultists gonna cult.
Good!Good optics for ICE here
ICE detain Santa—for checking on the boys & girls at detention center.
So no link then?I know eh? it's all lies. There never was a removal order issued in 2023, there never was a warrant. The whole thing was just made up out of whole cloth. Now, we were saying something about cultists?
My apologies, sometimes I forget that I need to spoonfeed.So no link then?
Gantchev did have lawful permanent resident status from 2005 until 2009, the press release said. But in 2023, an immigration judge ordered him to leave the U. S. and return to Bulgaria.
Then on Sept. 30, ICE's Enforcement and Removal Operations unit in Chicago arrested him on a warrant
But you do not forget to condescend.My apologies, sometimes I forget that I need to spoonfeed.
Great. So they scooped up a productive immigrant on what amounts to be a misdemeanor, housed him in a for-profit facility where he died of "natural causes" and you think this is a good thing.![]()
Bulgarian citizen dies in custody of ICE while held at West Michigan facility, authorities say
A Bulgarian citizen, whom federal officials say was in the U.S. illegally, was found unresponsive in his cell at a Michigan facility.www.cbsnews.com
Sometimes it better to simply state the information and allow whomever want's to follow up on that statement to do their own research and follow up on it themselves, especially when it comes to Xitter randos posting things that are blindly accepted as fact. Take that video of that supposedly pregnant woman being arrested upthread. Nothing to show us how she ended up on the ground as that part of the clip was somehow missing, some rando yells out "she's pregnant", another rando posts it yet not even The Guardian included that bit of information in their reporting of the incident.But you do not forget to condescend.
Great. So they scooped up a productive immigrant on what amounts to be a misdemeanor, housed him in a for-profit facility where he died of "natural causes" and you think this is a good thing.
Nah. Make a claim, post a link.Sometimes it better to simply state the information and allow whomever want's to follow up on that statement to do their own research
He was in custody since Sept. He appealed a denial for custody re-determination, and was stuck in the facility until his death. Kinda sucks; The guy died in custody for two months over a ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ misdemeanor. Seems a country that thinks itself exceptional might have a better process.The process in the USA, along with the process i pretty much every country in the world works this way.
You didn't say it was a bad thing either. You said:I never said the guy dying in custody is a good thing, that's something you want to read into it.
Being charitable, I'd call that callous. Being a diabetic myself, I know there's a lot of things that can kill you if you're not careful, and prisons are not known for the quality of medical care. 30 detainees have been confirmed to have died in custody; I don't think that reflects well on the process.Poor guy was so stressed out over being detained over his status that it killed him. If only there was some way he could have avoided that situation.
Obviously fake. There are buildings in the background; everyone knows the entire city of Portland was burned to the ground five years ago. Trump said so.Good optics for ICE here
ICE detain Santa—for checking on the boys & girls at detention center.
"Santa run!" witnesses yell. "They're coming Santa! Run!"
Agents run at a full sprint from inside building to tackle him to ground—kneel on his back.
"Be nice to Santa!... This is a little excessive!"
Multiple agents try to drag him across the pavement into the building—but they were not strong enough to carry him.
ICE claims that Santa stepped over a blue line they painted on the ground outside the facility in Portland, Oregon
Nah. Make a claim, post a link.
Obviously fake. There are buildings in the background; everyone knows the entire city of Portland was burned to the ground five years ago. Trump said so.
Or are going to play the "That's not the one I meant" whack-a-mole gameI've found that nine time out of ten, when someone says "do your own research", it means they have no source beyond "I heard it somewhere".
Hurrah for Santa
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
@ICEgov
AVOID ICE AIR AND SANTA’S NAUGHTY LIST!
Self-deport today with the CBP Home app, earn $3,000 and spend Christmas at home with loved ones.
Holiday incentive is valid through the end of 2025.
Here's the thing: The people who voted for Trump will say they voted for this. So Trump's cemsorship of CBS news through his stooge Bari Weiss sort of backfired. Cultists and edgelords will applaud the torture.The 60 Minutes CECOT Segment the WH Doesn’t Want You To See
… and swimming pools!.. um… no, hang on, that’s a different rant . . .but but in europe you can get arrested for social media posts!1
… and swimming pools!.. um… no, hang on, that’s a different rant . . .
Goldbeck, 40, explains: “This year the vast majority of our work has been supporting litigation to halt or slow down national guard deployments, providing subject expert witnesses, retired generals, to talk through with staff what the footprint of these deployments might look like and how to prepare, and training for activist groups on who the guard is, who they’re not – the difference in the uniforms that the guys at ICE are wearing versus the national guard.
“Then serving as advisers for governors and mayors who are living day to day through this, helping them shape their communications and ensure that things don’t become more violent. That’s been a huge line of effort for us.”
![]()
Janessa Goldbeck speaks in front of the Capitol. Photograph: Courtesy Vet Voice Foundation
It would be a mistake to assume that all national guard members are Make America Great Again (Maga) diehards eager to do Trump’s bidding. In every city except the capital, their role has eventually been restricted by courts to guarding federal property. Some have told Goldbeck that it is tedious and unfulfilling work.
“There’s a wide range of feelings for the folks I’ve spoken to, ranging from boredom – this is a waste of time – to anger because they’ve been taken away from their families and their jobs. Most guardsmen make more in their civilian jobs than they do when they’re deployed but they signed up to serve their communities, to either serve overseas to protect the homeland or to respond in cases of a natural disaster.
reason.com
In a December 4 memo, originally leaked by journalist Ken Klippenstein, the Justice Department encourages federal prosecutors to press "domestic terrorism" charges against people for "doxing" law enforcement officers. While undefined in the memo, "doxing" in this context is understood to mean the publishing of information that identifies law enforcement officers, which the Justice Department insinuates is a threatening activity used to "silence opposing speech, limit political activity, change or direct policy outcomes, and prevent the functioning of a democratic society."
This definition mirrors previous statements by DHS officials earlier this year, including a statement made by Noem in July: "Violence is anything that threatens [agents] and their safety, so it's doxing them, it's videotaping them where they're at when they're out on operations." However, much of what the Trump administration tries to paint as the unacceptable "doxing" of law enforcement agents is often observers merely recording on-duty officers—an activity firmly protected by the First Amendment when no physical interference or danger is present, and an important tool for holding public officials accountable. By broadly defining domestic terrorism to include something as vague as "doxing," the Trump administration has rolled out a "nationwide policy of intimidating and threatening people who attempt to observe and record DHS operations," according to David Bier, the director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute.
![]()
Could the feds throw you in jail for merely filming ICE immigration raids?
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said "videotaping" agents was violence—but Border Patrol brought a film crew to Chicago-area raids.reason.com
So a constitutionally protected activity is being declared domestic terrorism? Wonder when they're gonna start shooting filmers?
Totally not facism.
In a December 4 memo, originally leaked by journalist Ken Klippenstein, the Justice Department encourages federal prosecutors to press "domestic terrorism" charges against people for "doxing" law enforcement officers. While undefined in the memo, "doxing" in this context is understood to mean the publishing of information that identifies law enforcement officers, which the Justice Department insinuates is a threatening activity used to "silence opposing speech, limit political activity, change or direct policy outcomes, and prevent the functioning of a democratic society."
Late spring 2026. It'll coincide with rounding up all the dissident Bluesky users who they're going to use as forced labor to build a base on the dark side of the moon that'll house all the elites when climate change kills us all.Wonder when they're gonna start shooting filmers?
Huh? WTF are you on about?Late spring 2026. It'll coincide with rounding up all the dissident Bluesky users who they're going to use as forced labor to build a base on the dark side of the moon that'll house all the elites when climate change kills us all.
Think you're safe behind that pseudonym? Think again.
![]()
Florida man arrested for allegedly posting death threats to ICE agents on social media account
A Fort Myers man was arrested after he allegedly made online death threats to Immigration and Customs enforcement officers, according to DHS.www.cbsnews.com
I'm more surprised reason aren't cheerleading this one frankly.![]()
Could the feds throw you in jail for merely filming ICE immigration raids?
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said "videotaping" agents was violence—but Border Patrol brought a film crew to Chicago-area raids.reason.com
So a constitutionally protected activity is being declared domestic terrorism? Wonder when they're gonna start shooting filmers?
Totally not facism.
???I'm more surprised reason aren't cheerleading this one frankly.
RelaxHuh? WTF are you on about?
Are you claiming I'm making death threats? Where? When?
Also too, are you threatening me?
How is it paranoid? The corrupt administration wants to designate those who record iceholes as domestic terrorists, and they've already demonstrated their eagerness to kill other designated terrorists without due process, like, I dunno, narco-terrorists. Iceholes have already shot people they deemed a threat, including the woman in Chicago who they shot five times, then dropped the charges. Idiot Trump suggested they shoot migrants, and of course is long on record for wanting to execute drug dealers, which he is doing right now, extra-judicially. And then there's iceholes pointing weapons at protesters, saying "You're dead, liberal." I can't believe a reasonable person would look at all this and not see how dangerous it is, unless they love it, as long as it isn't used against them.Relax
I was just having a little fun with your ultra paranoid question.
No, it is not. Explicitly not,Look at the leap the article had to make to equate filming with domestic terrorism. They're talking about doxing, like those three women who followed that icehole home then livestreamed his address. Trying to cram that Noem quote in there is, indeed, paranoid.
The Trump administration last month made explicit what it has been implying for months, namely that it considers videotaping ICE raids to be illegal and intends to go after those who do it. The administration is, effectively, preparing to defy current law: Federal courts have overwhelmingly held that the First Amendment protects the right to record police activity in public spaces.
Writing in The American Prospect, Matthew Cunningham-Cook reports that in response to an inquiry from the Center for Media and Democracy, Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said, “Videotaping ICE law enforcement and posting photos and videos of them online is doxing our agents” and added: “We will prosecute those who illegally harass ICE agents to the fullest extent of the law.”
Numerous reports from raid scenes suggest that ICE agents are already informally “enforcing” their disapproval of at-the-scene recording by shoving, beating and even shooting (with less lethal munitions) journalists, freelance photographers, and others with cellphone cameras. Bad things seem to happen especially often when persons who make a practice of filming raids are themselves noncitizens.
In July, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem made a similar remark, saying that “violence” against ICE agents includes “anything that threatens them and their safety, so it is doxing them, it’s videotaping them where they’re at when they’re out on operations.”
Not paranoia, but reality. This corrupt administration fully intends to prosecute as terrorists those who film iceholes. I'm sick of this gaslighting ◊◊◊◊.In a December 4 memo, originally leaked by journalist Ken Klippenstein, the Justice Department encourages federal prosecutors to press "domestic terrorism" charges against people for "doxing" law enforcement officers.
You clearly did not read or comprehend anything in the post to which you responded. Your post.Like I said, a big leap.
Representatives of this administration explicitly expressed they consider filming of icehole agents as doxing, and doxing of said agents as domestic terrorism. Those are the words that came out of their mouths, and to suggest otherwise is gaslighting and intellectually dishonest.. . . to equate filming with domestic terrorism
So no leap, but the words of the administration. Don't tell me the words don't mean what they mean.Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said, "Videotaping ICE law enforcement and posting photos and videos of them online is doxing our agents” and added: “We will prosecute those who illegally harass ICE agents to the fullest extent of the law.” . . . , the Justice Department encourages federal prosecutors to press "domestic terrorism" charges against people for "doxing" law enforcement officers.
Your words.I will, however, clear this whole misunderstanding up both for your peace of mind and the convenience of the FBI surveillance team that's currently monitoring your communications. I have no reason to believe that the poster using the handle Resume has ever made any threatening statements nor advocated violence against government agents.
Don't tell me words don't mean what they mean. Your last few posts have revealed that you are a dishonest interlocutor. I do not put posters on ignore, but do ignore posts that ignore clear, precise refutations of their assertions. Gaslight someone else.Think you're safe behind that pseudonym? Think again.