• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Trump's promised ICE raids have begun

The 60 Minutes CECOT Segment the WH Doesn’t Want You To See​


Here's the thing: The people who voted for Trump will say they voted for this. So Trump's cemsorship of CBS news through his stooge Bari Weiss sort of backfired. Cultists and edgelords will applaud the torture.
 
Last edited:
Goldbeck, 40, explains: “This year the vast majority of our work has been supporting litigation to halt or slow down national guard deployments, providing subject expert witnesses, retired generals, to talk through with staff what the footprint of these deployments might look like and how to prepare, and training for activist groups on who the guard is, who they’re not – the difference in the uniforms that the guys at ICE are wearing versus the national guard.

“Then serving as advisers for governors and mayors who are living day to day through this, helping them shape their communications and ensure that things don’t become more violent. That’s been a huge line of effort for us.”

a group of people in front of white buildings

Janessa Goldbeck speaks in front of the Capitol. Photograph: Courtesy Vet Voice Foundation
It would be a mistake to assume that all national guard members are Make America Great Again (Maga) diehards eager to do Trump’s bidding. In every city except the capital, their role has eventually been restricted by courts to guarding federal property. Some have told Goldbeck that it is tedious and unfulfilling work.

“There’s a wide range of feelings for the folks I’ve spoken to, ranging from boredom – this is a waste of time – to anger because they’ve been taken away from their families and their jobs. Most guardsmen make more in their civilian jobs than they do when they’re deployed but they signed up to serve their communities, to either serve overseas to protect the homeland or to respond in cases of a natural disaster.
 



In a December 4 memo, originally leaked by journalist Ken Klippenstein, the Justice Department encourages federal prosecutors to press "domestic terrorism" charges against people for "doxing" law enforcement officers. While undefined in the memo, "doxing" in this context is understood to mean the publishing of information that identifies law enforcement officers, which the Justice Department insinuates is a threatening activity used to "silence opposing speech, limit political activity, change or direct policy outcomes, and prevent the functioning of a democratic society."

This definition mirrors previous statements by DHS officials earlier this year, including a statement made by Noem in July: "Violence is anything that threatens [agents] and their safety, so it's doxing them, it's videotaping them where they're at when they're out on operations." However, much of what the Trump administration tries to paint as the unacceptable "doxing" of law enforcement agents is often observers merely recording on-duty officers—an activity firmly protected by the First Amendment when no physical interference or danger is present, and an important tool for holding public officials accountable. By broadly defining domestic terrorism to include something as vague as "doxing," the Trump administration has rolled out a "nationwide policy of intimidating and threatening people who attempt to observe and record DHS operations," according to David Bier, the director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute.

So a constitutionally protected activity is being declared domestic terrorism? Wonder when they're gonna start shooting filmers?

Totally not facism.
 





So a constitutionally protected activity is being declared domestic terrorism? Wonder when they're gonna start shooting filmers?

Totally not facism.
In a December 4 memo, originally leaked by journalist Ken Klippenstein, the Justice Department encourages federal prosecutors to press "domestic terrorism" charges against people for "doxing" law enforcement officers. While undefined in the memo, "doxing" in this context is understood to mean the publishing of information that identifies law enforcement officers, which the Justice Department insinuates is a threatening activity used to "silence opposing speech, limit political activity, change or direct policy outcomes, and prevent the functioning of a democratic society."

I'm glad I no longer have a functioning irony meter.
 
Wonder when they're gonna start shooting filmers?
Late spring 2026. It'll coincide with rounding up all the dissident Bluesky users who they're going to use as forced labor to build a base on the dark side of the moon that'll house all the elites when climate change kills us all.

Think you're safe behind that pseudonym? Think again.

 
Late spring 2026. It'll coincide with rounding up all the dissident Bluesky users who they're going to use as forced labor to build a base on the dark side of the moon that'll house all the elites when climate change kills us all.

Think you're safe behind that pseudonym? Think again.

Huh? WTF are you on about?

Are you claiming I'm making death threats? Where? When?

Also too, are you threatening me?
 
Last edited:
Relax

I was just having a little fun with your ultra paranoid question.
How is it paranoid? The corrupt administration wants to designate those who record iceholes as domestic terrorists, and they've already demonstrated their eagerness to kill other designated terrorists without due process, like, I dunno, narco-terrorists. Iceholes have already shot people they deemed a threat, including the woman in Chicago who they shot five times, then dropped the charges. Idiot Trump suggested they shoot migrants, and of course is long on record for wanting to execute drug dealers, which he is doing right now, extra-judicially. And then there's iceholes pointing weapons at protesters, saying "You're dead, liberal." I can't believe a reasonable person would look at all this and not see how dangerous it is, unless they love it, as long as it isn't used against them.

So a thing that is already happening isn't paranoid, it's reality.

ETA: And you still haven't demonstrated where I made death threats against govt agents, unless you think criticizing their methods are some kind of threat. It's a dick move, so put up or shut up.
 
Last edited:
Look at the leap the article had to make to equate filming with domestic terrorism. They're talking about doxing, like those three women who followed that icehole home then livestreamed his address. Trying to cram that Noem quote in there is, indeed, paranoid.
 
Look at the leap the article had to make to equate filming with domestic terrorism. They're talking about doxing, like those three women who followed that icehole home then livestreamed his address. Trying to cram that Noem quote in there is, indeed, paranoid.
No, it is not. Explicitly not,

The Trump administration last month made explicit what it has been implying for months, namely that it considers videotaping ICE raids to be illegal and intends to go after those who do it. The administration is, effectively, preparing to defy current law: Federal courts have overwhelmingly held that the First Amendment protects the right to record police activity in public spaces.

Writing in The American Prospect, Matthew Cunningham-Cook reports that in response to an inquiry from the Center for Media and Democracy, Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said, “Videotaping ICE law enforcement and posting photos and videos of them online is doxing our agents” and added: “We will prosecute those who illegally harass ICE agents to the fullest extent of the law.”

Numerous reports from raid scenes suggest that ICE agents are already informally “enforcing” their disapproval of at-the-scene recording by shoving, beating and even shooting (with less lethal munitions) journalists, freelance photographers, and others with cellphone cameras. Bad things seem to happen especially often when persons who make a practice of filming raids are themselves noncitizens.

In July, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem made a similar remark, saying that “violence” against ICE agents includes “anything that threatens them and their safety, so it is doxing them, it’s videotaping them where they’re at when they’re out on operations.”

So not paranoid at all.

Again, please demonstrate where I've advocated violence against govt agents, or take it back, please.*

ETA: And to connect the dots . . .

In a December 4 memo, originally leaked by journalist Ken Klippenstein, the Justice Department encourages federal prosecutors to press "domestic terrorism" charges against people for "doxing" law enforcement officers.
Not paranoia, but reality. This corrupt administration fully intends to prosecute as terrorists those who film iceholes. I'm sick of this gaslighting ◊◊◊◊.

* Oh ◊◊◊◊, you don't believe, like dog-killler Noem, that filming iceholes is violence against them?
 
Last edited:
Like I said, a big leap.

Nothing I've said is about you personally, that's something your reading into my comment because if I'd meant it that way, I would have said it that way.

I will, however, clear this whole misunderstanding up both for your peace of mind and the convenience of the FBI surveillance team that's currently monitoring your communications. I have no reason to believe that the poster using the handle Resume has ever made any threatening statements nor advocated violence against government agents.
 
Like I said, a big leap.
You clearly did not read or comprehend anything in the post to which you responded. Your post.
. . . to equate filming with domestic terrorism
Representatives of this administration explicitly expressed they consider filming of icehole agents as doxing, and doxing of said agents as domestic terrorism. Those are the words that came out of their mouths, and to suggest otherwise is gaslighting and intellectually dishonest.
Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said, "Videotaping ICE law enforcement and posting photos and videos of them online is doxing our agents” and added: “We will prosecute those who illegally harass ICE agents to the fullest extent of the law.” . . . , the Justice Department encourages federal prosecutors to press "domestic terrorism" charges against people for "doxing" law enforcement officers.
So no leap, but the words of the administration. Don't tell me the words don't mean what they mean.

I will, however, clear this whole misunderstanding up both for your peace of mind and the convenience of the FBI surveillance team that's currently monitoring your communications. I have no reason to believe that the poster using the handle Resume has ever made any threatening statements nor advocated violence against government agents.
Your words.

Think you're safe behind that pseudonym? Think again.
Don't tell me words don't mean what they mean. Your last few posts have revealed that you are a dishonest interlocutor. I do not put posters on ignore, but do ignore posts that ignore clear, precise refutations of their assertions. Gaslight someone else.
 

Back
Top Bottom