gabeygoat
Master Poster
Cool, advocate for gun control then.There have been 54 non-white supremacist double-digit mass shootings since then. I'm guessing there have probably been close to a thousand total mass shootings since then also.
Cool, advocate for gun control then.There have been 54 non-white supremacist double-digit mass shootings since then. I'm guessing there have probably been close to a thousand total mass shootings since then also.
Why? Much better that we actually lock up career criminals rather them out over and over again.Cool, advocate for gun control then.
Jurisdictions such as Canada and the EU that have better gun control laws in place also have far fewer mass shootings.Why? Much better that we actually lock up career criminals rather them out over and over again.
jocoreport.com
www.clintonnc.com
txktoday.com
cwbchicago.com
Causation? What were the gun homicide rates before they had these laws?Jurisdictions such as Canada and the EU that have better gun control laws in place also have far fewer mass shootings.
'No Way to Prevent This,' Says Only Nation Where This Regularly HappensWP
These are good anecdotal examples of why gun control is a good idea.Another update on the 18 mass shootings that occurred in the four days after the Maine mass shooting. I challenged fellow forum members to use those random 18 mass shootings to highlight the examples of white mass shooters that they claim I ignore. No one has bothered.
2 black males were arrested for the Clinton, North Carolina mass shooting that left 5 dead.
2 additional black males were identified in the Miami mass shooting.
1 additional black male was arrested for the Wiggins, Mississippi mass shooting.
I will update the list below, feel free to contribute and show everyone all of these white mass shooters I keep ignoring.
18 mass shootings.
2 Latino males.
15 black males.
0 white males.
October 26 – Clinton, North Carolina – 5 killed – Drug-related
Black male – Robert Andrew Daquan Williams![]()
Two Men Indicted In 2023 Murder Of Five
CLINTON – United States Attorney Michael F. Easley, Jr., announced today (Wednesday) federal charges against two men arising from the murders of five people in a house on Garland Highway in Sampson County. The indictment alleges that the two are responsible for the October 2023 murders. In a...jocoreport.com
Black male – Derek Donte George![]()
Shooting suspect charged with assault, witness intimidation | Sampson Independent
A Clinton man arrested in the shooting of another in Dogwood Circle two years ago has now been charged with assault offenses and witness intimidation in that case, as well as failing to appear in…www.clintonnc.com
Derek Donte George Arrest Record & Booking Info – Sampson County, North Carolina
Derek Donte George (age 35) was booked in Sampson County, North Carolina. Click to View booking details.recentlybooked.com
October 27 – Mansfield, Ohio – 2 killed, 4 wounded – House party
Black male – Cyrus J Ellerbe
(Check for more later)![]()
Mansfield police arrest 22-year-old for party shooting that left 2 dead
A 22-year-old man has been arrested in connection with a shooting that took place during a party in a Mansfield home, according to police.www.news5cleveland.com
October 27 – Little Rock, Arkansas – 1 killed, 4 wounded – Gas station parking lot
Black male – Kamarion Stokes
October 28 – Chicago, Illinois – 4 wounded – Drive-by
October 28 – Texarkana, Texas – 3 killed, 3 wounded
Black male – Breoskii Warren
Black male – Devon Hayden
![]()
Two Arrested in Shooting that Left Three Dead
Texarkana, Texas Police have made two arrests in the shooting that left three people dead and three more wounded at a party on Saturday night. Breoskii Warren, 20, turned himself […]txktoday.com
October 28 – Chula Vista, California – 4 wounded
Black male – (Juvenile, CCTV)
![]()
15-year-old suspect arrested after four shot at Otay Ranch Town Center during dispute
Chula Vista police said the shooting did not appear to be an active shooter and it was "not random."www.cbs8.com
October 28 – Decatur, Georgia – 4 wounded – Drive-by
October 28 – Cumberland, Maryland – 1 killed, 3 wounded – Outside of club
Black male – Devonte Warfield
![]()
Hagerstown man charged in Merchants Alley shooting
CUMBERLAND — A Hagerstown man has been charged in connection with a shooting early Saturday that killed a teenager and wounded three others in Merchants Alley off South Mechanic Street,www.times-news.com
October 28 – Las Cruces, New Mexico – 7 wounded – Drive-by
October 28 – Lake Charles, Louisiana – 6 wounded
Black male – Artavien Green
![]()
Suspect apprehended in Bruce Drive shooting
The Calcasieu Parish Sheriff’s Office has identified a 17-year-old juvenile as the suspect in a shooting on Bruce Drive.www.kalb.com
October 29 – Azusa, California – 4 wounded – House party
October 29 – Chicago, Illinois – 15 wounded
Black male – William A Groves
![]()
Man accused of shooting 15 people at Halloween party was convicted of attempted murder in 2008, acquitted of murder in 1997: court records
William Groves, the man Chicago police say shot 15 people at a Halloween party over the weekend was convicted of attempted murder in 2008 and acquitted of first-degree murder in 1997, according to Cook County court records.cwbchicago.com
October 29 – Wiggins, Mississippi – 1 killed, 3 wounded
Black male – Montrell Malik Quinn II
Black male – Zadarruous Sutton
![]()
Suspect charged in connection to deadly weekend shooting at 195 Fruitland Park
According to jail records, 23-year-old Montrell Malik Quinn II of Hattiesburg was arrested and booked into the Forrest County Jail on Wednesday.www.wdam.com
October 29 – Tampa, Florida – 2 killed, 15 wounded
Black male/mixed-race – Tyrell Stephen Phillips
Black male – Kaydn Abney
Black male – Dwyane Eugene Tillman Jr![]()
Teen charged as adult in fatal Ybor City shooting
TPD says Kayden Abney, 14, fired fatal shot.baynews9.com
![]()
Third suspect in the Ybor City shootings will remain in jail
Dwayne Tillman Jr., 21, is accused of firing his gun into the crowded streets of Ybor City over Halloween weekend.www.wusf.org
October 29 – Atlanta, Georgia – 1 killed, 3 wounded – Gas station parking lot
October 29 – Indianapolis, Indiana – 1 killed, 9 wounded – House party
Alan Peregrino, Juvenile, look for pictures later
October 29 – Dodge City, Kansas – 2 killed, 2 wounded
Latino male – Ricardo J. Cadena-Garcia
October 29 – Wilson, North Carolina – 4 wounded
Latino male – Braulio Fuentes-Martinez
![]()
High school student wanted for shooting four people caught
The shooting happened early Sunday at the Wilson fairgrounds.www.wect.com
These are good anecdotal examples of why gun control is a good idea.
There is little causal connection between gun control laws and homicide.
Good thing there's actual science to answer your question.Causation? What were the gun homicide rates before they had these laws?
Results
In the 18 years before the gun law reforms, there were 13 mass shootings in Australia, and none in the 10.5 years afterwards. Declines in firearm‐related deaths before the law reforms accelerated after the reforms for total firearm deaths (p = 0.04), firearm suicides (p = 0.007) and firearm homicides (p = 0.15), but not for the smallest category of unintentional firearm deaths, which increased. No evidence of substitution effect for suicides or homicides was observed. The rates per 100 000 of total firearm deaths, firearm homicides and firearm suicides all at least doubled their existing rates of decline after the revised gun laws.
Conclusions
Australia's 1996 gun law reforms were followed by more than a decade free of fatal mass shootings, and accelerated declines in firearm deaths, particularly suicides. Total homicide rates followed the same pattern. Removing large numbers of rapid‐firing firearms from civilians may be an effective way of reducing mass shootings, firearm homicides and firearm suicides.
Good thing there's actual science to answer your question.
Australia's 1996 gun law reforms: faster falls in firearm deaths, firearm suicides, and a decade without mass shootings - PMC
After a 1996 firearm massacre in Tasmania in which 35 people died, Australian governments united to remove semi‐automatic and pump‐action shotguns and rifles from civilian possession, as a key component of gun law reforms. To determine whether ...pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The bit you're looking for:
There are many good reasons to have strict controls on he ownership of guns and other weapons. Hence why the founding fathers explicitly tied the possession of weapons to being an active member of a government controlled militia in the US constitution.These are good anecdotal examples of why gun control is a good idea.
Ugh, and it didn't work in Brazil because? If you take a population that already had low rates of homicide and say same later policy caused that low rate of homicide then you have no understanding of causation.You just can't stand that it has been shown that gun control can be effective, can you?
UK homicide rates were low before any gun control.The UK homicide figures around the 2000's were heavily distorted by one man, Dr Harold Shipman, he was believed to have killed over 230 people over three decades but his victims weren't recognised as having been murdered until his crimes came to light and the subsequent police investigation and enquiry. British crime statistics aren't revised historically so suspected victims going back to the 1960's were included in the late 1990's to 2005 figures. UK homicides are so low that this was enough to cause a peak.
This paper takes a closer look at the effects of the NFA on gun deaths. Using a battery of structural break tests, there is little evidence to suggest that it had any significant effects on firearm homicides and suicides. In addition, there also does not appear to be any substitution effects—that reduced access to firearms may have led those bent on committing homicide or suicide to use alternative methods. Since the 1996 Port Arthur massacre, two other shooting incidents have attracted much media attention in Australia. An incident on October 21, 2002 at Monash University, in which a gunman killed two people and wounded five, prompted the National Handgun Buyback Act of 2003. Under this scheme that ran from July to December 2003, 70,000 handguns were removed from the community at a cost of approximately A$69 million. Another shooting on June 18, 2007, in which a lone gunman killed a man who had come to the aid of an assault victim and seriously wounded two others in Melbourne’s central business district during morning rush hour, renewed calls for tougher gun controls. Although gun buybacks appear to be a logical and sensible policy that helps to placate the public’s fears, the evidence so far suggests that in the Australian context, the high expenditure incurred to fund the 1996 gun buyback has not translated into any tangible reductions in terms of firearm deaths.
UK homicide rates were low before any gun control.
The first significant UK gun law was in 1920.Before 1824? Okay. Or are you referring to The Crossbows Act of 1541?
I post a sourced scientific paper from the high-impact peer-reviewed journal Injury Prevention and you respond with an unsourced paper published on (checks) johnrlott.tripod.com.
You're better than this art. How "not" to argue is to avoid fallacious argument (you, of course, know this). Arguing against the source without checking the actual source could be described as a genetic fallacy. Again, knowing the body of your word, you're probably aware of this fallacy.I post a sourced scientific paper from the high-impact peer-reviewed journal Injury Prevention and you respond with an unsourced paper published on (checks) johnrlott.tripod.com.
Yeah, that's how to argue.
| Contemporary Economic Policy is a reliable academic journal because it is peer-reviewed and published by Wiley, a reputable publisher. Its reliability is supported by its rigorous standards, which include a peer-review process, author guidelines on ethical standards, and its publication by the Western Economic Association International (WEAI). The journal has also published work from notable economists, including Nobel laureates |
The 2024 Impact Factor for Injury Prevention is 2.0. The 5-year Impact Factor is 3.4. Other metrics include a CiteScore of 5.7 and a Journal Citation Indicator (JCI) of 0.74.
|
The 2024 Impact Factor for Contemporary Economic Policy is 1.868, as calculated by exaly.com. Other sources list a similar 2024 Impact Factor of 1.7, notes a 2025 Impact Score of 1.6, a 2-year Impact Factor of 1.5, a 5-year Impact Factor of 1.4, and a CiteScore of 3.6.
|
You're better than this art.
I don't understand? What study do you want me to link to that hasn't already been posted? The one that art was responding to? Surely not?Then why not link to the study, why link to someone's interpretation of it?
I mean, neat catch and all, but...
I don't understand? What study do you want me to link to that hasn't already been posted? The one that art was responding to? Surely not?
Despite quoting you, it was more of a general question. OK, got that.
The stats you quoted are from a study, right? What stats are you talking about? Do you mean the stats pertaining to how reliable the original article referenced by art and linked by Trausti was, that's all I quoted and linked to? You're all over the place here?
Right. So if the stats are from that study, why link to "johnrlott.tripod.com"? I didn't but why not? The bona-fide, peer reviewed article was available from there! I get that John R lott may be, in your eyes, a rabid pro gun nut but he didn't write the article! Does it support Lott's views? Perhaps and then again perhaps it gives a fair and balanced picture on the results of the Australian buy back but you'll never know because, in this case, you prefer to stick your fingers in your ears, cover your eyes and go blah, blah, blah! You're so entrenched in your position that you won't consider anything at all that might, any small way, give you pause for thought.
If I were Arth I wouldn't have clicked on that ◊◊◊◊ either. You/he didn't/don't have to, see below. Anyway, can you tell me how you arrived at the conclusion that the link was whatever disparaging word the censor is hiding?
That's a completely reasonable action to take, especially in today's age. A more reasonable action, in my opinion, would be to consider whether the article might assist you in understanding the matter at hand from a different perspective, taking 30 seconds to look up John Lott and then being in a better position to decide if you wished to read the article by clicking through to it. Failing that or finding John Lott questionable, you could have searched for the article directly by inputting it's name into your chosen search engine and said search engine would have taken you to it, by-passing that dastardly John R Lott and his unscrupulous site altogether.
I have no reason to trust that site. You have no reason not to by exactly the same measure of research you put into your decision.
and not trusting it isn't an ad hom. I was specific and never mentioned ad hom. The reason for this is that a genetic fallacy has a different focus, namely the argument's origin or history and not the character of the person making the argument. Why are you attempting to make the case that I did?
It's ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ cybersecurity lol. Oh FFS! Yes, by all means be careful online but when you have so many other avenues to the source article this is the poorest reason (and yet the best you can think of) that I have ever heard not to consider a, possibly, opposing position.
That's all you've got? I wanted to respond to plauge331's post point by point and the forum software kept breaking responses into those individual "boxes". I'll make deal with you though, I'll try and do better if you follow suit. How does that sound?Please learn how to multiquote.
Yes, that's what it's supposed to do. That's what we want it to do. Please let it do it.That's all you've got? I wanted to respond to plauge331's post point by point and the forum software kept breaking responses into those individual "boxes". I'll make deal with you though, I'll try and do better if you follow suit. How does that sound?
Yes, that's what it's supposed to do. What? like this?
That's what we want it to do. Then you won't have any problem seeing this. If that is the case what was your problem with my previous post?
Please let it do it. I did, as you could and can plainly see. Unless I'm totally misunderstanding you, what is your complaint?
ThisYou're better than this art. How "not" to argue is to avoid fallacious argument (you, of course, know this). Arguing against the source without checking the actual source could be described as a genetic fallacy. Again, knowing the body of your word, you're probably aware of this fallacy.
Is howThe source of the paper referenced by Trausti is the Contemporary Economic Policy journal. Here's a look at how reliable it is and how it matches your requirements.
You do a multiquoteIt, the journal, has a scimago h index of 59*. Scimago ratings measure cites, it is influenced by output of course. It has an impact factor of 1.7*. I would consider the paper to be within the discipline of Political Science/Public policy where, although relative, a score of 1.5 -3 is generally good
Reply.The paper was written by Wang-Sheng Lee who is an associate professor at the Centre for Development Economics and Sustainability at Monash University. He has a personal scimago rating of 20 and co-authored by Sandy Suardi who is Professor Faculty of Business and Law, School of Business, Wollongong. He has a personal scimago rating of 23. This shows that their peers aren't ignoring them and their work is considered reliable.
OK.To be clear, I wasn't attempting to counter your argument.
I can't understand why I went the route I did? Of course I know how to multi-quote. Thanks for the kick up the arse!This
Is how
You do a multiquote
Why thank you.Reply.
Fair enough but I feel that a little bit of effort on your part wouldn't have hurt. Did you/will you ever read the paper?If you think I'm trying to rebut your response to me, you are wrong. I accept your analysis. I did not do the research. But, it has to be said, neither did Trausti. If he had posted the link to the original paper, rather than a link to a PDF without a landing page on some dude's blog, I wouldn't have had anything to say about it.
A point not in contention by me....snip... Gun control works. And that simple fact sends a certain cohort of Americans completely mad.
It's your cargo cult thinking that drives us mad.Gun control works. And that simple fact sends a certain cohort of Americans completely mad.
Many of the city’s public high schools had shooting clubs and a few even had gun ranges on their premises, according to accounts from the Department of Education and others.
There were at least three shooting ranges in public schools, the DOE said, including Curtis HS on Staten Island and Erasmus Hall HS in Brooklyn.
Another inside Far Rockaway HS in Queens, which closed in 2011, is shown in a black-and-white archival photo from May 1929 displaying a compartmentalized gun range with at least five windows to shoot from and cranks for students to pull the targets back and forth.
“To accommodate the kids, they even made them these little pull-out benches they can kneel on to shoot from that position or even lie down to shoot,” said Darren Leung, owner of Westside Rifle & Pistol Range in Chelsea, describing the equipment seen in the 89-year-old photo. “What an excellent design.”
Shooting clubs were popular in many schools, even if they didn’t have gun ranges.
Most people can handle their guns responsibly. Then we have a Sandy Hook, and these same responsible people think "hey you know this isn't really working out, what with that one in a million that shoots up a school. I think the socially responsible thing to do is let myself be more heavily regulated as a precaution against those who are not responsible".