• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

there is a law inside the alphabet

Similarly in A.P. Herbert's "Uncommon Law" one sketch has a lawyer pronouncing Latin as his school believed the way Romans pronounced it with "ooltra weeres" for ultra vires as one example and being rebuked by the judge. From my junkheap of a memory. I couldn't see it on Gutenberg despite its age.
Note how you were able to express a specific pronunciation using an idiom of English spelling and we all heard the sounds correctly in our minds.
 
Also, you will hear lots of different pronunciations in American law for prima facie, but you can bet that no lawyer will use the classical pronunciation in open court.
 
Wandering off further, one of the most interesting things I read on language was a postgrad paper from around 1981. The author discussed all current models of anaphoric resolution and their strengths and weaknesses and edge cases they failed on. His piece de resistance was something no model at the time could explain
"The boy stood on the burning deck,
picking his nose like mad.
He rolled it into little balls
and flung it at his dad."
 
Similarly in A.P. Herbert's "Uncommon Law" one sketch has a lawyer pronouncing Latin as his school believed the way Romans pronounced it with "ooltra weeres" for ultra vires as one example and being rebuked by the judge. From my junkheap of a memory. I couldn't see it on Gutenberg despite its age.
The one legal podcast I listen to will occasional make note of judges and lawyers' ability to avoid saying certain words and phrases or note how everyone in a courtroom will pronounce a word differently.
 
The less enlightened use it as a derogatory term for LGBTQ+
That's the only way I've heard the term used.

(Sorry, couldn't resist, but Google "the alphabetties" or the alphabet women and you'll probably get the story. Someone has already spent time in jail for dropping hints. Amazingly, the central character is actually "woman H".)
I did, and I got a series of children's books about famous women whose names start with the various letters. The term "alphabetties" had no matches on Google.
 
It came up for me but I suppose these things are personalised. The complainers in the Alex Salmond prosecution were anonymised, and designated by letters of the alphabet. "Woman H" is the one who seems on the face of it to have committed blatant perjury but is getting away with it. Perhaps this article may help.


I know who woman H is, and several of the others, but like everyone else, I'd be jailed for contempt of court if I told you.
 
This has been one of the most entertaining things about moving to Utah: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deseret_alphabet

If you scour rare book stores (which I do), you can still find the occasional material printed in this alphabet. It also occasionally appears ironically around town when people want to make a heritage statement. Phonetic alphabets exist for English, and are used in such activities as transcription. But the common spellings arose organically and remain so despite all efforts from the various "alphabet people" to reform or standardize them.
"The Deseret alphabet was based on the 1847 version of Isaac Pitman's English Phonotypic Alphabet", it says.
"The IPA (International Phonetic Alphabet) was created by the International Phonetic Association, founded in Paris in 1886 by language teachers (led by Paul Passy and Henry Sweet) to standardize phonetic transcription, replacing messy systems for teaching foreign languages. It began with symbols for English, French, and German but evolved into a universal, language-neutral system...", Google Ai says.
The IPA alphabet has undergo several revisions since then, because it is an ongoing alphabet.
 
"The Deseret alphabet was based on the 1847 version of Isaac Pitman's English Phonotypic Alphabet", it says.
Yes, and ... ?

The International Phonetic Alphabet is very important to people who want to accurately represent phonemes from any language. It's also quite unwieldy for simply the number of symbols you have to learn and figure out how to reproduce faithfully. The notion of simplifying and standardizing English spelling is only tangentially related. Pitman is most famous for his shorthand, which allows a stenographer to write English phonetically using a very simplified set of symbols that could be written as fast as a person talks. I still have some old "steno" pads: spiral bound at the top with a line down the center. You write shorthand in left column and then transcribe it to ordinary English spelling in the right column later when you have more time. Pitman's extension of written shorthands to printed phonetic alphabets was a valiant attempt that seems to have stuck more where I live than anywhere else. But it still didn't catch on.

It's not hard to come up with new symbols to represent sounds. What's hard is getting people to stop using the system they already have and adopt your new symbols. We like rough, through, cough, though, and bough even though they're objectively dumb and difficult.
 
I prefer ASCII to EBCDIC.
Who doesn't? Whoever thought it was a good idea to break up the encodings for the Roman alphabet and allow them to be a non-contiguous range? I assume that was all Hollerith's fault.

The one good thing I liked was when MTS (a variant operating system for the IBM 370) filled your program's data space with a "core constant" before it ran your program. The constant was lower case a in EBCDIC, which looks like 'a' when you interpret it as text, 0x81 in hexadecimal, and 10000001 in binary—all easy to remember and easy to spot values. Consequently it was easy to tell in crash dumps which parts of your memory had been used and which remained initialized and untouched. As a young twentysomething trying to program engineering solutions in assembly (or Evil Fortran), that helped.
 
Written languages are constructed, based on spoken ones, which are organic, so reality rarely matches the map. Which is part of why languages are fun, if you ask me.
these are Google Ai answers:
1765387720044.png
how many conlang alphabets are there ?
1765387793739.png
what is difference between a conlang alphabet and a real alphabet ?
1765387840862.png
1765388601356.png
1765388802804.png
 

Back
Top Bottom