Hercules56
Banned
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2013
- Messages
- 17,176
I basically agree but none of that has any impact what I've been saying, or really on whether or not Israel has a right to exist.
The Israelite religion was indigenous to the area we now call Israel and Palestine. It is pretty clear that the people who would become jews were never in Egypt as slaves so the whole story of genesis is just myth. If the first temple existed, probably did, it was likely a temple of the polytheistic Canaanite religion for whom Yahweh was merely the chief of god of the Proto-Israelites. So, basically as different a religion from Judaism as Judaism is from Christianity.
Any rate, using the existence of the first and second temples as justification for the modern state of Israel is nonsensical, about as nonsensical as the denial that the Jews didn't originally come form the region around Jerusalem in the first place.
The Jews and Jewish culture and religion does originate from the land of Israel, which is somewhat of a justification for building a Jewish State there. But of course it conflicts with the rights of people who had moved into the land and existed in 1948 who were not Jews.
However as I mentioned earlier if the Jews only wanted to build a state in parts of Palestine where it basically nobody existed I don't think anybody would have had an issue with it. Such as if the Jews decided to only build a state for themselves in the Negev desert.
Nobody then and nobody now would really complain about the Jews having a state in the Negev.
Last edited: