• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Same missile?

Alright this is ridiculous. His claims have been completely debunked, but yet he remains oblivious. I suggest we all leave this thread and stop feeding the twoofer. If you stop feeding him, maybe he will go away.
 
Quad4_72 said:
Alright this is ridiculous. His claims have been completely debunked, but yet he remains oblivious. I suggest we all leave this thread and stop feeding the twoofer. If you stop feeding him, maybe he will go away.
Click to expand...


Probably wise.
 
MaGZ said:
I do not know the precise speed of the object. However, you can compare the missile to the explosion in building WTC 2 and you will see these series of videos are in real time unlike Blue Monk’s version where he apparently has slowed down the video to fit his explanation that the missile is really a bird. Those who are good with videos and measurements would be able to come up with an estimate of how fast the object is moving.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_TxzMUKwyc&mode=related&search
Click to expand...
I'm not good with videos, but consider this: A typical AA missile is around 3 meters long and travels at speeds fast enough to overtake a jet fighter, so lets say Mach 2. That's around 700 m/s. This means that such a missile travels around 200 times its own length per second.
I estimate the length of the thing in this video at about 5% of the diagonal of the field of view. This then implies that a missile would take in the order of 0.1 s to travel through the entire field of view. Thats 2 to 3 frames. Birds typically fly at around 10-50 body lengths per second. The rest of the math I leave up to you.
 
I'm not good with videos, but consider this: A typical AA missile is around 3 meters long and travels at speeds fast enough to overtake a jet fighter, so lets say Mach 2. That's around 700 m/s. This means that such a missile travels around 200 times its own length per second.
I estimate the length of the thing in this video at about 5% of the diagonal of the field of view. This then implies that a missile would take in the order of 0.1 s to travel through the entire field of view. Thats 2 to 3 frames. Birds typically fly at around 10-50 body lengths per second. The rest of the math I leave up to you.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but, uh the gub'ment has all sorts of super-secret weapons. These missiles were able to be controlled from a 6 channel remote from somewhere inside the WTC's, and the speed of the missiles was controlled from this remote via one lever labled "Missile Speed Control". Don't you know anything about missiles?


(Or maybe some highjackers took over a couple of planes and flew them into the buildings?;) )
 
cloudshipsrule said:
Yeah, but, uh the gub'ment has all sorts of super-secret weapons. These missiles were able to be controlled from a 6 channel remote from somewhere inside the WTC's, and the speed of the missiles was controlled from this remote via one lever labled "Missile Speed Control". Don't you know anything about missiles?
Click to expand...
I don't know the secret slow, plump breasted model. You're probably going to tell me they're homing next.
 
Last edited:
You're probably going to tell me they're homing next.
Click to expand...

No, everyone knows that option won't be available until the Series III's are released just in time for the Christmas holidays.
 
MaGZ, please do some research , and let us know what type of missile, if you please. Also video proof of impact, possible reasons why missiles are flying around indiscriminately at the WTC complex, and proof of controlled demolitions in a burning building that shows no evidence of fire.
 
LC Final Cut to feature eyewitness to missile explosion in WTC 7.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2007/190607interview.htm

It was at this point that he witnessed a bomb going off inside the building:
"We subsequently went to the stairwell and were going down the stairs, when we reached the sixth floor, the landing that we were standing on gave way, there was an explosion and the landing gave way. I was left there hanging, I had to climb back up and now had to walk back up to the eighth floor. After getting to the eighth floor everything was dark."​

The individual in a second clip detailed hearing further explosions and then described what he saw when he got down to the lobby:
"It was totally destroyed, it looked like King Kong had been through it and stepped on it and it was so destroyed i didn't know where I was. It was so destroyed that had to take me out through a hole in the wall, a makeshift hole I believe the fire department made to get me out."​
Click to expand...

Avery and Burmas, who played the two short clips of the interview prior to further analysis and more clips to be played on their own GCN radio show later tonight at 7pm CST, further described how the individual had witnessed dead bodies in the lobby of 7 and was told by the police not to look at them.​
Click to expand...
 
MaGZ said:
A missile explosion is how the people died in the lobby of WTC 7.
Click to expand...

Hmmmm, really??. :confused:

Does this mean that you are giving up on the contention (you made) that a missile hit the 14th floor?

Does that mean that you amend your contention about the supposedly secret installation, which you previously suggested was the reason for blowing 7 WTC must now be in the lobby area instead of higher up, like on or around the 14th floor, where you previously contended the supposed missile hit?

Does that also mean that you're conceding that your presentation of images and interpretation of the imagery claiming fires (what everyone else seems to think are probably reflections or internal lights) on upper floors to be a result of a missile hit is incorrect?

Does that mean that you're conceding that the alleged "damage" to 1 WTC (I believe you claimed it was on the eastern face, if I have that wrong, sorry) cannot possibly be the result of missile debris given the impossible angle and curve the alleged debris would have to follow to hit the eastern face of 1 WTC, not to mention how high up the debris would have to fly?

Et cetera.

:boggled:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom