Same missile?

[HyJinX]

You can see WTC 7 on fire on floors 11 and 12 in these photos.

http://www.amanzafar.com/WTC/index.shtm

Ummmmm....which photo, exactly?

 

[JC Fla]

Bodies in the lobby of WTC 7 were a makeshift triage center. People in the street were killed when the missile hit WTC 7 on the 14th floor.

Take a look at National Geographic documentary Inside 9/11 and you will see a scene where emergency personnel are placing someone in an ambulance. Slow motion the film up the east side of WTC 1 and around the 34th floor you will see how shrapnel from the missile that hit across the street stated a fire on that floor.

I stand by the photos showing fires on floors 11 and 12 of the WTC 7 before the collapse of the Twin Towers. Also, I still believe WTC 7 was a controlled demolition.

Sounds like the Air Force deployed the new Aim-99 Firestarter Magic Missile.....

MaGZ, I say again, do a little research and please let us know what type of ordnance could do all these things, and report back. Otherwise, you are not going to find any help here for your "theory".


Feel free to use my post on page 4 as a basic starting point.

 

[MaGZ]

In this link Jack White has proof WTC 6 was on fire before the collapse of WTC 2. I think shrapnel from the missile that struck WTC 7 on the 14th floor likely set WTC 6 on fire.

http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies118a.htm

 

[pomeroo]

In this link Jack White has proof WTC 6 was on fire before the collapse of WTC 2. I think shrapnel from the missile that struck WTC 7 on the 14th floor likely set WTC 6 on fire.

http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies118a.htm

You've been caught lying again. No missiles were fired in the U.S. on 9/11/01. You have been corrected on this falsehood many times. Stop repeating it.

 

[MaGZ]

You've been caught lying again. No missiles were fired in the U.S. on 9/11/01. You have been corrected on this falsehood many times. Stop repeating it.

I’m just presenting evidence.
A photo which demonstrates WTC 6 on fire before the collapse of the Twin Towers demands an answer. The missile that struck WTC 7 is the best explanation.

 

[pomeroo]

I’m just presenting evidence.
A photo which demonstrates WTC 6 on fire before the collapse of the Twin Towers demands an answer. The missile that struck WTC 7 is the best explanation.

No missile struck WTC 7. It can't possibly be the best explanation.

 

[defaultdotxbe]

I’m just presenting evidence.
A photo which demonstrates WTC 6 on fire before the collapse of the Twin Towers demands an answer. The missile that struck WTC 7 is the best explanation.

why are the 2 airliners that struck WTC 1+2 not good explanations?

 

[flameowl]

I’m just presenting evidence.
A photo which demonstrates WTC 6 on fire before the collapse of the Twin Towers demands an answer. The missile that struck WTC 7 is the best explanation.

Please provide the other hypothesis that you discarded when you settled on a missile as the best explaination of events. Please also provide the reasons that you have discounted said other theories.

In addition, I'd be grateful if you could supply a rationale for accepting a highly 'enhanced' photograph as proof of anything at all. Everything in the non-enhanced original seems to be operating under the accepted circumstances of the day (including the fact that light reflects off of windows at many strange and unexpected angles during a non-static event, and even during a static moment in many large cities the whole world over).

 

[dudalb]

You've been caught lying again. No missiles were fired in the U.S. on 9/11/01. You have been corrected on this falsehood many times. Stop repeating it.

Hey it's our site Neo Nazi you are dealing with. Don't hold your breath for him to stop lying.

 

[leftysergeant]

The only thing that that picture of WTC 6 proves is that Jack White's IQ surpasses 100 by little if any.

And I have reason to doubt that the IQ of anyone who does not recognize that he has color-manipulated reflections on the windows to simulate fire even reaches 100.

 

[Hamradioguy]

So MaGZ, are you now able to tell me the extent of your firefighting training and experience that leads you to believe a reflection of sunlight is actually a fire resulting from a missile strike?

Six months now and no answer to my question. Good thing I've not been holding my breath all this time.

 

[SDC]

Seeing this pop up again made me think of the end of the movie of "Carrie." Only less entertaining.

 

[PhantomWolf]

In this link Jack White

Usually I'd stop here. Jack White is an idiot that couldn't find his butt is you gave him a photo of it, his abilities to analyse a photo compares with a slug's ability to build spacecraft, in fact the slug has a better chance of making orbit than Jack does of getting a single thing right in any analysis he ever has done. Jack's ability to analyse photographs is so horrendous that an average person on the street could do it better.

has proof

The only thing that Jack has ever proved is that he is the worst photo analyst on the face of the planet, and likely all other inhabited planets in the universe.

WTC 6 was on fire before the collapse of WTC 2.

Baloney, the idiot takes a compressed and shaded image and processes it to change the colour of the internal lighting, then compares it to an image that is far better resolution and taken from a totally different lighting angle, the man is a complete and utter moron. (and I'm not saying this because he still thinks the LRV was packed on the left side of the LM's ladder or that he doesn't understand that vehicles can move between photos being taken...)

I think shrapnel from the missile that struck WTC 7 on the 14th floor likely set WTC 6 on fire.

And I think that you are delusional to even consider that Jack White's "work" worthy of anything more than derision and laughter.

 

[dudalb]

And I think that you are delusional to even consider that Jack White's "work" worthy of anything more than derision and laughter.

What, a Holocaust denier and someone who beleives that there should be a White Aryan Homeland in the US is delusional!!!!
I am shocked! SHOCKED!

 

[MaGZ]

Please provide the other hypothesis that you discarded when you settled on a missile as the best explaination of events. Please also provide the reasons that you have discounted said other theories.

In addition, I'd be grateful if you could supply a rationale for accepting a highly 'enhanced' photograph as proof of anything at all. Everything in the non-enhanced original seems to be operating under the accepted circumstances of the day (including the fact that light reflects off of windows at many strange and unexpected angles during a non-static event, and even during a static moment in many large cities the whole world over).

In this thread I have demonstrated the missile strike on WTC 7. The fire which apparently was extinguished by the time of the collapse of WTC 2 can be seen as supporting evidence of the missile strike. Of course burning material from WTC 1 could have fallen onto WTC 6 but that would have only set parts of the roof on fire. The photo presented by Jack White indicates several floors of WTC 6 were on fire, apparently all started at the same time. A missile explosion across the street is the most likely explanation.

 

[TriskettheKid]

Missile shrapnel?

How in the world would missile shrapnel start a fire in WTC6?

 

[PhantomWolf]

In this thread I have demonstrated the missile strike on WTC 7. The fire which apparently was extinguished by the time of the collapse of WTC 2 can be seen as supporting evidence of the missile strike. Of course burning material from WTC 1 could have fallen onto WTC 6 but that would have only set parts of the roof on fire. The photo presented by Jack White indicates several floors of WTC 6 were on fire, apparently all started at the same time. A missile explosion across the street is the most likely explanation.

No in this thread you have made the exact same mistake as Jack in that you have proven that you have no idea what fire looks like and have managed to confuse internal lighting for fire.

 

[flameowl]

In this thread I have demonstrated the missile strike on WTC 7. The fire which apparently was extinguished by the time of the collapse of WTC 2 can be seen as supporting evidence of the missile strike. Of course burning material from WTC 1 could have fallen onto WTC 6 but that would have only set parts of the roof on fire. The photo presented by Jack White indicates several floors of WTC 6 were on fire, apparently all started at the same time. A missile explosion across the street is the most likely explanation.

So that's a "no" then? You haven't provided any of the theories that you discarded or reasons to discard them. You haven't provided any proof that (as per the scientific method) you gathered evidence and *then* made a conclusion. You haven't provided any evidence of your assertions at all (despite asserting that you have demonstrated the strike. that demonstration was not compelling enough to prevent me from asking for more evidence, despite having waded through the thread)

 

[MIKILLINI]

In this thread I have demonstrated the missile strike on WTC 7. The fire which apparently was extinguished by the time of the collapse of WTC 2 can be seen as supporting evidence of the missile strike. Of course burning material from WTC 1 could have fallen onto WTC 6 but that would have only set parts of the roof on fire. The photo presented by Jack White indicates several floors of WTC 6 were on fire, apparently all started at the same time. A missile explosion across the street is the most likely explanation.

In this thread MaGZ, you claimed a missile strike on WTC 7, but you have not demonstrated one shred of proof or anything tangible that resembles evidence of a missile strike.
I could claim electrical transformers exploded within WTC 7 and be closer to the facts than you are.
ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERS EXPLODED WITHIN WTC 7. Thats a claim and there were electrical transformers within WTC 7.
So prove Me wrong MaGZ.

 

[MaGZ]

Six months now and no answer to my question. Good thing I've not been holding my breath all this time.

The two links to the photos no longer work. However they came from this site. Good luck in finding them.

http://www.amanzafar.com/WTC/index.shtm

Look at the 11, 15, and 19 photos and you will see WTC 7 on fire near the 11 and 12 floors.

In the past you have claimed the fires pictured in the link is a reflection from the sun. This can not be the case since WTC 7 is in a shadow, so there is no solar reflection.