• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Regarding Franko...

It usually seems to be spelled "gravastar":

"They even suggest that the universe we now know and live in may be the interior of a Gravastar." http://www.lanl.gov/worldview/news/releases/archive/02-035.shtml

"Moreover, from Earth, they would appear much the same as classical black holes." http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/space/01/22/gravastars/

"Other theorists have criticized the gravastar hypothesis. Mottola and Mazur defend it but admit they have work to do before they can explain how the objects actually develop when a star collapses." http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/astronomy/gravastars_020423.html

Unless, of course, Google's alternative suggestion is correct, and Franko means to refer to Indian cricket player Sunil Manohar Gavaskar (http://www.cricket.org/link_to_database/PLAYERS/IND/G/GAVASKAR_SM_06001378/)... ;)
 
Lol.
When the observed facts do not match the dreamed up religious dogma....Ignore the facts. Black holes do not exist..... But some Goddess does. Whatever.....
 
Gentlemen, if Phil Plait couldn't get A-ristotle over to Johns Hopkins to talk to the astronomy guys, do you really think you can?

Forget it. His density (as the Knight once put it) rivals that of black holes, and as we know, the prophet tolerates no rivals.

Maybe etymology. Lessee, Universe - Uni = One. Singularity - Singular = one. Therefore, the Universe is a singularity. We're in the universe. Therefore we're inside a singularity.

Makes as much sense as F-atoms and F-LOP.

Ditto the fool. Whatever. Well said.
 
whitefork said:
Gentlemen, if Phil Plait couldn't get A-ristotle over to Johns Hopkins to talk to the astronomy guys, do you really think you can?

"You can lead a horse to water, but you can't force it to drink."

Someday I'll learn to deal with that which I cannot change.

Upchurch
 
Sometimes you can't lead the horse to water. Sometimes the horse prefers to gnaw on his stable door. (I like horses - they have a complex relationship to human beings that goes way back)

The Elephant has an especially fine response at the top of page 6, the Logical?Deism thread.
 
Upchurch said:

It's called "intrinsic nature", wraith-old-boy. Have Pope Franko give you a lesson in it sometime.

I dont see the connection.
;)


What are you? 12 years old? maybe 13?

just turned 20 two days ago actually lol...
going to have a sick arse party this weekend :cool:
aiming for a girl to guy ratio of 3 to 1
;)
 
wraith said:
just turned 20 two days ago actually lol...
going to have a sick arse party this weekend :cool:
aiming for a girl to guy ratio of 3 to 1
;)
Happy birthday, wraith. Have a great time at your party, but remeber that all actions have conseqences. Don't do or even allow things that would have bad consequences. Other than that, PARTEEEEE!!!!!
 
Tricky said:
That's right. You chose. You had no MPB (no particular reason), but you chose anyway. Let me show you this again in case your memory is faulty.

no Twix, no
;)

me "choosing" 33 was my Fate...it was the result of my MPB
I used the word "choose" to describe the situation that I was in ie the selection from many options

I "chose" 33
but really, I didnt choose anything

the way that I interpret my experiences, made me "choose" 33. no matter how subtle it is...

In 30 minutues, Im going to have dinner. I could "choose" to have chicken or steak. I like them both.

However, that "choice" has already been made. Do I "choose" what I feel like to eat? Why dont I "choose" to feel like eating an onion?

NOW, would you agree that my brain state determined what I chose?


By now you should realize that you admit you have choices and they are not necessarily based on MPB.

You present me a basket of fruit, or a series of number :rolleyes: and ask me to "choose" one.

I have a range of "choices"
but teally, I have no choice because the way that I have interpreted my experiences determines what "choices" I make.

Does 2 + 2 choose to equal 4?

If I had read your post at a different time, I could have "choosen" 55 or 93 or 84....
Im obeying TLOP
;)

Now, each time that you try to tell me I have "no choice" I will remind you of your own words which show that you believe in choice. My lad, you are busted.

My "choices" are the result of MPB.
They have been already made.
2+2 does not equal 10...as much as you wish it did
;)



Free will is a part of TLOP.

How does obeying TLOP give you Free-will?
I have asked Mista and he failed to give an answer without looking a tad sheepish
haha

you can give it a shot though...
I dare you
;)
 
Tricky said:
Face it Franko. Wraith was caught in a flat out contradiction and he must face my righteous scorn. Let him deal with it.

there is no contradiction ;)
I obey TLOP
MPB is not "magical"
MPB does not equal free-will

my "choices" are determined by MPB

"I choose to have breakfast."
My translation: It was my Fate to have breakfast. I have MPB. I obey TLOP.

Free-willy believers translation: I choose to have breakfast. I cant be predicted. Uncertainty = free-will. My history has nothing to do with my choices. It's all magic!

But alas, comes a time when the young ones must leave the nest and fly on their own. Wraith is now struggling with the difficult art of dissembling, and you should let him do so, without trying to pick him up each time he falls. It is the only way he will learn. Don't cover for him, or he will never be able to defend Logical Deism without you.

LOL!

Actually, LD is kicking the arse of your so called "non-religion" ;)
 
Tricky said:

It was not trying to prove MPB was random so much as trying to show a case where MPB is different from free will. Wraith admitted that he did not know why he chose 33. This means there could be no "perceived" benefit if he did not know why.

actually
the perceived benefit was to actually "choose" a number in the first place

33 was the first number that came to my head...probably saw it on a bus or something
;)

Of course, one could argue that prior brain states led to the choice, but the point is that those brain states were imperceptible to him.

what do you mean by this?
 
wraith said:


no Twix, no
;)

me "choosing" 33 was my Fate...it was the result of my MPB
I used the word "choose" to describe the situation that I was in ie the selection from many options

I "chose" 33
but really, I didnt choose anything
Well then you should avoid using the words "choose" or "choice" completely. People are going to be confused if you say "choice" when you mean "no choice". What do you suggest for an alternative?


the way that I interpret my experiences, made me "choose" 33. no matter how subtle it is...

In 30 minutues, Im going to have dinner. I could "choose" to have chicken or steak. I like them both.

However, that "choice" has already been made. Do I "choose" what I feel like to eat? Why dont I "choose" to feel like eating an onion?

NOW, would you agree that my brain state determined what I chose?
See? Anyone listening to you would think you had all kinds of free will with all the "choices" you are about to make.
Would I agree your brain state "determined" what you chose? Possibly. Of course, that brain state could also be described as "free will". Unless you can show that the brain state is a reliable predictor of what you will do, then you have at least the illusion of free will. In my opinion, the illusion of free will is no different from free will unless you can show how it is different. Some other atheists disagree with me on this point.

Does 2 + 2 choose to equal 4?
Uh, no. There are no options. I thought we cleared this up earlier. Why are you asking the same questions I already answered? Is your memory that poor?

If I had read your post at a different time, I could have "choosen" 55 or 93 or 84....
Im obeying TLOP
;)
And how is "obeying TLOP" discernably different from making choices? I would venture to say that you cannot provide any evidence for difference. Prove me wrong, if you can.

My "choices" are the result of MPB.
They have been already made.
2+2 does not equal 10...as much as you wish it did
;)
Can you tell me what choices you will make in the future? If not, then you have no evidence that your choices have already been made. Did you know in advance you would pick 33? You say you didn't have a reason for picking it. What evidence can you give to show that your choice was fated, versus you picking it with free will?
What is the observable difference between a fate which makes decisions that you cannot predict and free will which makes decisions you cannot predict? There is none. You claim there is a reason, but you can give no evidence, and you use the word "choice" then claim it means "no choice". Wraith my nescient young lad. You are engaging in "wishful thinking".

My "choices" are the result of MPB.
They have been already made.
2+2 does not equal 10...as much as you wish it did
;)
If they have already been made, can you tell me what all of your future choices are? If not, then why do you assume they have been made? Wouldn't it be a bummer if you had a major babe at your birthday party that really wanted to get close to you, but you discovered your MPB said it was not gonna happen? If it were me, I'd tell my MPB to take a long walk off a short pier. Something tells me, you would too.

How does obeying TLOP give you Free-will?
I have asked Mista and he failed to give an answer without looking a tad sheepish
haha

you can give it a shot though...
I dare you
;)
All right then. TLOP includes laws that are non-deterministic. Since there are non-deterministic things in the universe, free will is possible. Not only is it possible, TLOP demands it.

I have accepted your dare. Will you accept mine? I dare you to deliberately say something that contradicts Franko. I just want to see if you have any yarbles.

You're no longer a teenager, wraith. You can make your own decisions. Go for it.
 
wraith said:
MPB does not equal free-will
It has been shown on this forum that MPB - as you use the term - is indeed Free Will. You have no say in the matter, Wraith. Resistance is futile. You have Free Will.
my "choices" are determined by MPB
Which is Free Will.
"I choose to have breakfast."
My translation: It was my Fate to have breakfast. I have MPB. I obey TLOP.
Which is Free Will.
 
Tricky said:

Happy birthday, wraith. Have a great time at your party, but remeber that all actions have conseqences. Don't do or even allow things that would have bad consequences. Other than that, PARTEEEEE!!!!!

why thank you
;)
 
Tricky said:

I dare you to deliberately say something that contradicts Franko. I just want to see if you have any yarbles.

You're no longer a teenager, wraith. You can make your own decisions. Go for it.

This is not allowed Tricky.....Simply not allowed.

Tlop controls Franko/Franko controls cult/wraith is cult member.
 
Tricky said:

Well then you should avoid using the words "choose" or "choice" completely. People are going to be confused if you say "choice" when you mean "no choice". What do you suggest for an alternative?

just think to yourself "wraith's choices are Fated"
;)


See? Anyone listening to you would think you had all kinds of free will with all the "choices" you are about to make.
Would I agree your brain state "determined" what you chose? Possibly. Of course, that brain state could also be described as "free will". Unless you can show that the brain state is a reliable predictor of what you will do, then you have at least the illusion of free will. In my opinion, the illusion of free will is no different from free will unless you can show how it is different. Some other atheists disagree with me on this point.

Illusion of free-will?
Do you have an illusion of a 4 sided triangle?

Uh, no. There are no options. I thought we cleared this up earlier. Why are you asking the same questions I already answered? Is your memory that poor?

haha
what makes you think that you have an option to have cerial or toast ( whether it may be more complex then you or not ;) ) for breakfast?

when you go to take a dump, did you just happen to use toilet paper willy nilly?

why didnt cavemen use "free-will" and make the stuff?


And how is "obeying TLOP" discernably different from making choices? I would venture to say that you cannot provide any evidence for difference. Prove me wrong, if you can.

Bit like a pilot who was ordered to go into battle, then saying to his friends that he "chose" to?


Can you tell me what choices you will make in the future?

I plan to catch the bus for work.

If not, then you have no evidence that your choices have already been made. Did you know in advance you would pick 33? You say you didn't have a reason for picking it. What evidence can you give to show that your choice was fated, versus you picking it with free will?

Why would I "choose" a number in the first place if you didnt ask the question?
When you did ask the question, it would make no sense for me to say "I knew that I was going to pick 33"


What is the observable difference between a fate which makes decisions that you cannot predict and free will which makes decisions you cannot predict? There is none. You claim there is a reason, but you can give no evidence, and you use the word "choice" then claim it means "no choice". Wraith my nescient young lad. You are engaging in "wishful thinking".

negative
;)
How does obeying TLOP give you free-will, whether you can be predicted or not by another person?


If they have already been made, can you tell me what all of your future choices are? If not, then why do you assume they have been made? Wouldn't it be a bummer if you had a major babe at your birthday party that really wanted to get close to you, but you discovered your MPB said it was not gonna happen? If it were me, I'd tell my MPB to take a long walk off a short pier. Something tells me, you would too.

haha!
MPB doesnt work like that.
I dont know if im going to get into a fight tomorrow with a group of tuffs lol
if I am, then at this point in time, they must be doing something that leads to the actual fight. The way that I will respond is based on my MPB. My MPB processes my history to give an outcome.

Just say that you box, and for the past 50 matches, you have dominated every fight that you had with this other boxer. When you guys meet again the next day, will you be scared?


All right then. TLOP includes laws that are non-deterministic. Since there are non-deterministic things in the universe, free will is possible. Not only is it possible, TLOP demands it.

How does uncertainy = free-will?
When do you come to a red light and have feelings of uncertainy, whether or not you have the ability to stop?

How does TLOP demand free-will?
You obey TLOP. You can have both. You cant use QM as an argument either. If I was driving a car at complete random, does the car have "choice" to go left or right? Backwards or forwards?

I have accepted your dare. Will you accept mine? I dare you to deliberately say something that contradicts Franko. I just want to see if you have any yarbles.

You're no longer a teenager, wraith. You can make your own decisions. Go for it.

haha
I accept!
;)

Frankster believes that he drives on the right side of the road. I believe that I do
:cool:
 
PixyMisa said:
It has been shown on this forum that MPB - as you use the term - is indeed Free Will. You have no say in the matter, Wraith. Resistance is futile. You have Free Will.

Which is Free Will.

Which is Free Will.

strike 3
youre out of there kid
;)
 
The Fool said:


This is not allowed Tricky.....Simply not allowed.

Tlop controls Franko/Franko controls cult/wraith is cult member.

just wondering Fool...

is your avatar an actual picture of you

:rolleyes:
 
wraith said:


just wondering Fool...

is your avatar an actual picture of you

:rolleyes:
yes.


And Franko, If you still cannot see how anything could break out of a "black" hole singularity therefore the "big bang" could not happen relies on the initial state being a black hole....Here is another possibility.

http://itss.raytheon.com/cafe/qadir/q2718.html

Because it was a very different kind of a singularity than what you find inside a black hole. The essential physics were entirely different. There were no 'in-going' geodesics, only 'out-going' ones in time. For black holes, you only have 'in-going' geodesics. Also, black hole 'solutions' are part of the local geometry of space-time and are embedded objects. The Big Bang singularity is part of the global geometry to space-time and is not an embedded object. As to how matter escaped from the Big Bang singularity, it's simple. Matter had no choice. These were the only geodesics possible at the time. Also, although local 'horizons' were present, they were constantly growing in size so that today they have all merged together to form the one that we see as the horizon to the visible universe.
 

Back
Top Bottom