Is there another Mr Rumbold than the one in Are You Being Served? Because, if not, it's likely that only the older British forum members will get that.
The future is . . . um . . . cloudy:
Twitter Spirals Into Decline and a Plague of Bots is Totally Out of Control
A week?
The future is . . . um . . . cloudy:
Twitter Spirals Into Decline and a Plague of Bots is Totally Out of Control
A week?
That's the direction the wind is blowing today.
I doubt he can resist for long.
Why is it so important that Twitter specifically be amenable to being a cesspool of even more acidity than it already was? It's because the reactionary conservatives fundamentally don't understand that Twitter wasn't just more popular and more influential, it was so in part because they couldn't corrupt it as much.
There's also the counterpart to that. A lot of reactionaries actually are intelligent people and we really shouldn't neglect that. That they couldn't corrupt it as much may be better looked at as a challenge. So, they work to change the rules in their favor so that they can suppress those that resist their dominance, even if it means using a nuclear option. It would hardly be out of character and, quite frankly, even if people just move to an uncorrupted venue again, damage has been done that gives them advantage, both immediate and as backing for future attempts to put pressure on and corrupt where ever the people went to.
One also shouldn't forget that China, Russia, Iran, and so on have serious issues with Twitter. Musk is... quite connected to a number of powerful forces that regard Twitter as more a thorn in their side. Musk's pretty directly channeled Putin, for that matter, and the pro-Ukraine part of the world has been using Twitter to somewhat incredible effect against Russia.
Even if Musk isn't intentionally sabotaging Twitter, it would be no surprise at all for Musk to have been a useful pawn for those hostile to Twitter who knew him and could easily predict the issues that he would cause.
If we're doing our job properly, we're all but invisible.If anything this whole fiasco is yet another object lesson in how little IT staff is respected.
If you want social media without censorship, go to 4chan.No Bob, I do understand that. That is why I said this change more aligns the business with the Constitution. Of course the private business normally has a much different model, and standard.
There is a lot of censorship on social media, and outlets such as YouTube. It is entirely legal, but a different standard of freedom.
No-one cares about people who don't express opinions. Only those who raise their voice have a say.15 million "people" voted in Musk's poll. One of his other tweets says there were 134 million views.
Even if all the numbers were real people, which we can be sure that is not the case, the majority was silent. The people did not express an opinion leaving Musk to paint lipstick on a pig.
If we're doing our job properly, we're all but invisible.
Employees fired from Twitter's Ghana HQ accuse Musk of trying to ‘silence and intimidate’ them
Also, that their dismissals were in flagrant violation of Ghana's labor laws in a bunch of ways and more.
Yet another set of lawsuits for Twitter to deal with.
Oh, and John Oliver ripped Musk pretty badly in his recent monologue.
Elon Musk’s Twitter has reinstated the personal account of far-right Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, which was banned in January for violating the platform’s COVID misinformation policies at the time.
Thru that link I found this:
https://twitter.com/petergyang/stat...-him-Willy-Wonka-who-benefited-from-apartheid
Uhh, scare off your advertisers and free speech or no, Twitter is dead.
One of my campaign managers logged in last week and found all our paused creatives from the past 6 years had been reactivated.