Do you believe that context is unimportant?
Let me give you an example. I hit my thumb with a hammer. I say "**** that hurt". Am I talking abut a painful bowl movement? Let me give you one more. A friend drops a box behind me, I say "what the ****". Did my friend just have intercourse with the box?
Your posting style differs from mine. As people who engage in reasoned discussion normally understand that context is an important factor, I, in my posting, would have assumed you had the ability to make a reasoned attempt at proper contextualization and would not have posted in a way that called your ability to do that in question.
Further, had I thought you had posted something that demonstrated what I considered to be improper contextualization I would have likely said something like this:
It seems to me your claim lacks proper context because, followed by x,y,z where x and where y and where z would all be claims associated with a demonstration of improper contextualization.
Look, if you think I have taken something out of context, permit me to request you come right out and scream it; and, if you are so inclined, also say why. One other step might be indicated, but I know, that further step is a difficult one for some.
That step is:
Be prepared for a reasoned response from me either agreeing or disagreeing that something I said was not in proper context.
Context is an element of rational discussion.
Let me ask for sake of understanding: Do you think I do not know what contextualization is or means or what its importance is to reasoned discussion?
