Larry Silverstein explaining what he meant by 'pull it'

Are you freakin' serious?

What do you think the insurance policies were for?

You do know that Lucky Larry and his two adult children met for breakfast every day at the tower restaurant. Larry was at the doctors and his children were running late.


I don't think Lucky Larry had any obligation to rebuild with the insurance money.

I would have expected you to counter with evidence that Larry made money, instead of asking a stupid question, making an irrelevant and purposefully loaded statement, and prefacing another statement with the immortal "I don't think" but that's just me.

Unless you think insurance companies regularly pay out claims when there's even a hint of fraud, or Larry did any better than break even, or you have ANY compelling evidence whatsoever that the man was somehow in on a plot to kill thousands of people so he could "make out like a bandit", then nobody really cares about what you think.
 
Are you freakin' serious?

What do you think the insurance policies were for?

You do know that Lucky Larry and his two adult children met for breakfast every day at the tower restaurant. Larry was at the doctors and his children were running late.


I don't think Lucky Larry had any obligation to rebuild with the insurance money.

Bolded part:

I got all 4 tires stolen from my car a few years back. They did NOT pay the total cost to have them replaced. As a matter of fact, I was personally on the hook for over 50% of the cost.

Those are TIRES.
For a CAR.

And you think the insurance company would pay in its entirety, and then some, for the WTC complex?

:confused:
 
How do you figure he lost money?

How did you figure he made out like a bandit and received a windfall?

Remember like you've claimed and ignored.

/It takes some balls for a guy like RI to ask a question about Larry's finances and expect an answer. See my sig.
 
No one has provided a bit of evidence that Larry made any money that day. Red, you shouldn't act as if any of us has forgotten that fact.
 
Paying leases on buildings that no longer exist. You know this. Don't be stupid.

You might want to reread the thread. We've been over this. Perhaps, afterwards, you might consider scheduling an appointment with your physician and tell him or her about your memory troubles.

Are you freakin' serious? Wash, rinse, repeat indeed. :rolleyes:

This may be a hard pill to swallow but, RedIbis is right.

It is very un-likely that he actually lost money. He would have made money by now if 9/11 never happened.

He absolutely did not profit from this.

:)
 
I don't think Lucky Larry had any obligation to rebuild with the insurance money.

You have no idea what you are talking about.

I'd bet you don't even know what his agreement is with the Port Authority.

Why don't you try to impress us and give a little evidence for your "opinion".


I bet you won't.

:rolleyes:
 
Bolded part:

I got all 4 tires stolen from my car a few years back. They did NOT pay the total cost to have them replaced. As a matter of fact, I was personally on the hook for over 50% of the cost.

Those are TIRES.
For a CAR.

And you think the insurance company would pay in its entirety, and then some, for the WTC complex?

:confused:

But, but, he's a rich Jew! The Jews run the system, remember?
 
Yup, that must be the reason why the insurance companies aren't paying attention to the handful of truthers who claim that it's obvious Larry committed fraud. It must be some kind of rich Jew honor system.
 
Yup, that must be the reason why the insurance companies aren't paying attention to the handful of truthers who claim that it's obvious Larry committed fraud. It must be some kind of rich Jew honor system.
The reality is, the insurers never did pay out what the "truthers" claim they paid Silverstein Properties (SP).

They don't consider the fact that all insurance payouts have to go through the PA and be used to rebuild what was originally insured. This is all spelled out in the SP/PA agreement made in 2006.

Anyone saying Larry made out is full of crap.

:(
 
I don't think Lucky Larry had any obligation to rebuild with the insurance money.

You have no idea what you are talking about.

I'd bet you don't even know what his agreement is with the Port Authority.

Why don't you try to impress us and give a little evidence for your "opinion".


I bet you won't.

:rolleyes:

Wow!

I'm totally shocked that Clayton Moore can not back up his claim.

As we all knew, He pulled this out of his butt, like he does all his claims.

:rolleyes:
 
The reality is, the insurers never did pay out what the "truthers" claim they paid Silverstein Properties (SP).

They don't consider the fact that all insurance payouts have to go through the PA and be used to rebuild what was originally insured. This is all spelled out in the SP/PA agreement made in 2006.

Anyone saying Larry made out is full of crap.

:(

Yes, but you don't know about the secret Jew Agreement made in 2007 that stipulates the insurance companies will allow Larry to demolish his own buildings and collect the insurance money as a reward for his Jewness.

WAKE UP!
 
Insurance Payout Fights

Bolded part:

I got all 4 tires stolen from my car a few years back. They did NOT pay the total cost to have them replaced. As a matter of fact, I was personally on the hook for over 50% of the cost.

Those are TIRES.
For a CAR.

And you think the insurance company would pay in its entirety, and then some, for the WTC complex?

:confused:

Didn't the insurance companies have a long wrangle with Deutsche Bank? And wasn't there also one with 1 Meridian Plaza in Philly?
 
I understand that insurance companies offer handsome rewards to informants in cases of fraudulent claims. Why don't the Truthers try taking their claims to the insurance companies, hmm? :rolleyes:
 
I understand that insurance companies offer handsome rewards to informants in cases of fraudulent claims. Why don't the Truthers try taking their claims to the insurance companies, hmm? :rolleyes:

They are too busy preparing their evidence to hand over to KSM's lawyers :rolleyes:
 
What you think has no bearing on reality.

Have you ever made an insurance claim? I have and they didn't just write me a check but wanted estimates for the repairs and receipts for all money spent.

It's a pain in the nether regions when you have to file an insurance claim.

Last time I was in an accident, I told the lady who hit me "I'll forget about it if you forget about it." She obliged.

Two reasons I did this - the car was fine just some scuffs which I could remove with hot soap and water and the other reason was I really did not want to deal with the insurance company again. Too much paperwork, too much waiting around for evaluations, estimates and waiting on payments to my mechanic. It sucks!

I could just imagine what Larry Silverstein had to deal with. :jaw-dropp
 
I could just imagine what Larry Silverstein had to deal with. :jaw-dropp

For WTC7 it would have been fairly straight forward, He owned the asset.

For the rest of the complex he was just the lease holder. He was never in control of the payments. The insurers obligations are to the owner first. The NY/NJ PA own the properties. Larry Silverstein never controlled the payouts for anything other than WTC7.

This is a very simplie thing to understand that seams to escape the simple minds of the average "truther". Larry Silverstein made no profit on what he did not own.

Simple fact. Larry Silverstein would have made more money if 9/11 never happened.

Anyone wanting to argue against this better be ready with lots of facts (not going to happen).
 
Last edited:
Are you freakin' serious?

What do you think the insurance policies were for?

You do know that Lucky Larry and his two adult children met for breakfast every day at the tower restaurant. Larry was at the doctors and his children were running late.


I don't think Lucky Larry had any obligation to rebuild with the insurance money.

You do know that your personal thoughts on Silverstein's obligations to rebuild or repay the insurance moneys informed noone with regard to NYC insurance regulations?

You'd have loved it if he had made out like a bandit, of course, because that gives you one more reason to hate those Joos!
 
You do know that your personal thoughts on Silverstein's obligations to rebuild or repay the insurance moneys informed noone with regard to NYC insurance regulations?

You'd have loved it if he had made out like a bandit, of course, because that gives you one more reason to hate those Joos!

It's the Texas Sharpshooter fallacy at work. Normal people know life is nothing but an undending stream of coincidences and random occurrences. Silverstein survives 9/11 = conspiracy. If Silverstein had died, do you think it would have = no conspiracy or would the CT loons simply found another imaginary scapegoat? Odds are they'd have found a way to imagine his death as intentional.
 

Back
Top Bottom