Hercules56
Banned
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2013
- Messages
- 17,176
Any who need food. There are many.Any idea which family she wanted to feed?
Give us a likely scenario if she had managed to dock in Gaza..
Any who need food. There are many.Any idea which family she wanted to feed?
Give us a likely scenario if she had managed to dock in Gaza..
I gotta figure Greta's entire plan hinged on Israel stopping her before she came under Hamas jurisdiction.Any idea which family she wanted to feed?
Give us a likely scenario if she had managed to dock in Gaza..
Docking in Gaza was never the plan.Any who need food. There are many.
Oh? You're changing the subject? So you agree that Israel was not operating in international waters, when they enforced their blockade of Gaza.
As for why Israel is blockading Gaza: Surely you must have realized by now that uncontrolled shipments to Hamas are an obvious and unacceptable security risk....
Greta's sailboat was not an aid ship.LOL.
Is that why they are blocking aid ships??
![]()
That is a lie. And the ship was seized in international waters.Greta's sailboat was not an aid ship.
Even Greta's publicists say it was a symbolic shipment.That is a lie. And the ship was seized in international waters.
No, it doesn't."I think the world needs a lot of more young angry women."
"... the internetWorld is gunna explode on this one c'mon lets make this interview statement Famous!!""I think the world needs a lot of more young angry women."
I think maybe it does, but not the useful idiots this movement is breeding.No, it doesn't.
Lies again. International waters very much exist in the eastern Mediterranean. Israeli sovereign water ends 12 miles from the coast line. And the Gaza coastline does NOT belong to Israel.Even Greta's publicists say it was a symbolic shipment.
And there are no international waters in the eastern Med. Everything between Cyprus, Lebanon, Egypt, and Israel is claimed and enforced by those nations. When Greta and her PR team say she was picked up in international waters, they are lying and expecting you to be stupid. Don't be stupid.

Israel actively targets "legitimate" aid and deliberately kills aid workers.I suppose what they "should" have done was use their influence to actually get more supplies into Gaza. Of course, this would have to start by establishing their bona fides to the Israeli government, as a trustworthy and impartial partner in humanitarian aid.
Using the language of the far-right misogynistic hateful shock jock? Again?I think the whole point of the stunt was to get those photo ops of the Deeply Disturbed Brave Campaigner...
I actually have an analogy here from my experience with modern and historical fencing. Bear with me for a moment, because it'll make sense in the end.Docking in Gaza was never the plan.
I think it does.No, it doesn't.
Did you notice that this was NOT something that Greta said?"... the internetWorld is gunna explode on this one c'mon lets make this interview statement Famous!!"
Since you offer this as a realistic scenario, what do you think the outcome would have been? (If they had docked.)I think the ship had every intention of docking in Gaza if they could. If the Israelis had not stopped them, they would hahave.
I'm sure you do. You happen to be wrong. The mental health of women is already seriously on the decline, particularly among the young. Making more of them angry won't help that.I think it does.
With the intent that others could then follow that up with shipments of arms. Hit your opponent where they aren't guarded. Makes sense.I think the ship had every intention of docking in Gaza if they could. If the Israelis had not stopped them, they would have.
They would have unloaded their aid and gone home.Since you offer this as a realistic scenario, what do you think the outcome would have been? (If they had docked.)
(Try being realistic. )