BenBurch
Gatekeeper of The Left
Paging Mr. Von Braun...![]()
True. But ethanol is not ideal.
Paging Mr. Von Braun...![]()
All regular unleaded here is at least 10% ethanol. I thought that is the way it is everywhere. Most stations offer 87, 89, and 91.
All regular unleaded here is at least 10% ethanol. I thought that is the way it is everywhere. Most stations offer 87, 89, and 91.
Outside the US, where gasoline prices are artificially held high, the differential between m85 street price and gasoline would be lower on a percentage basis. However, note that in these brief comments, I assume NO subsidy for methanol.
<snip>
We have very cheap gas. Gas in say, Norway, is near 8/gal.
Time for a fuel price comparison?
A litre of diesel cost me $2.20 in Scotland ten days ago.
That's a litre.
$8.33 per US gallon.
Time for a fuel price comparison?
A litre of diesel cost me $2.20 in Scotland ten days ago.
That's a litre.
$8.33 per US gallon.
Assuming the seals and hoses can be changed, you could alter the jetting (I'm assuming you have a carb) to have it run correctly on E10- and only E10.
I had to do this for my carb-equipped motorcycle, although it could not be made to run as well on E10 as E0.
Dave
Anyhow, I was pointing out that all gas is E10 or better because I don't think it requires any special seals or anything, that is E85 that needs a slight modification.
Lucky you.
$10/gallon gas would save the U.S.
Triple the cost of fuels, and watch the rush toward sane behavior and up-graded technology. Presumably, the extra tax would actually trickle down.
(sigh)
E85 needs more than a slight modification. Aside from material compatibility issues, the volume of fuel required to be injected is much larger with E85 than with straight gasoline so the car needs a new engine management system, a sensor to tell it what mix of alcohol and gasoline is in the tank and larger fuel injectors to be able to supply fuel at the required rate.
Lucky you.
$10/gallon gas would save the U.S.
Triple the cost of fuels, and watch the rush toward sane behavior and up-graded technology. Presumably, the extra tax would actually trickle down.
This is a minority opinion over here.
In fact, so far, mostly me.
(sigh)
I don't see how this wouldn't put all the working poor in a world of hurt for a long long time.
people would abandon cars and get about on very small capacity motorcycles. Bit like a return to the horse days....I don't see how this wouldn't put all the working poor in a world of hurt for a long long time.
people would abandon cars and get about on very small capacity motorcycles. Bit like a return to the horse days....
Yeah that's why I'd prefer a move to butanol instead of methanol or ethanol; better energy density, less corrosive and hygroscopic, no bootlegging issues et cetera.the XJ-S is all electronic so no messing around with carbs.
Apparently the real problem is how quickly the fuel tank will corrode.
the XJ-S is all electronic so no messing around with carbs.
Apparently the real problem is how quickly the fuel tank will corrode.