• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Artificial Intelligence Research: Supermathematics and Physics

abaddon said:
OK I am going to stop at that.

Think Atheist and more.

In summary, yes, same spam crap at thinkatheist and, in fact, the sheer scale of the many sites spammed is evidence of a strange compulsion. All of them have much the same responses. Roughly, half have handed out bans and half have not. I a list to use by now.

Why stop now when I am on a roll? Well, on one of his earlier victim sites, he naively posted too much data in his public profile. That would be uncomfortably close to doxxing. I am not going there.

I suppose, PGJ may not even recall doing it given he has posted his spam on so many sites.

If PGJ wishes to PM me, I will identify the site to him and him alone (so everyone else can get lost :) ) otherwise, I will not be getting into any of that.
Click to expand...

I post public data of myself all the time.

For example, with my github url, you will eventually find my Facebook url.
 
abaddon said:
Are you not paying attention?

You have publicly published personal data on a site that I bet you do not want to BE PUBLIC.

I am offering to help you by telling you in PM where that is so that you can fix it.

I am telling you, and you alone, nobody else.

CAN YOU NOT READ???
Click to expand...

If I were conspiratorially minded, I might suspect that the contact information you found was actually planted as part of a long ploy to discredit and attack an innocent third party.

Could the PGJ we all know and tolerate be a dedicated, nay obsessed, stalker engaging in a prolonged smear campaign against the person listed in the contact information you found?

Alternately, could the contact information you found be part of a honeypot, so PGJ can get the real email addresses of people he "debates" online?
 
abaddon said:
As Yoda would say "Difficult to see, the motivation is."

Everywhere he goes, he gets the same response. Nobody can make head nor tail of his quixotic language usage, even though everywhere he goes, people try to explain it to him. On top of that, he seems genuinely unable to understand the problem. I mentioned the sock-puppetry on SGU. I have seen the few posts his socks made before getting banned. They were exactly the same as any of his other posts complete with pointless images and colours. He didn't seem to care. "ProgrammingGodJordan/iChicken/tears of face palm/thought_fuhk have been banned" all identical in post format with the epic comment "And member iChicken has been plucked for being a sockpuppet of PB&J.".

It's like he is simply unaware. Why? Beats me.
Click to expand...

A good portion of those forums banned me, because I called a few people retarded...
 
Last edited:
halleyscomet said:
If I were conspiratorially minded, I might suspect that the contact information you found was actually planted as part of a long ploy to discredit and attack an innocent third party.

Could the PGJ we all know and tolerate be a dedicated, nay obsessed, stalker engaging in a prolonged smear campaign against the person listed in the contact information you found?

Alternately, could the contact information you found be part of a honeypot, so PGJ can get the real email addresses of people he "debates" online?
Click to expand...

One cannot help those who do not want help. There is a limit to my altruism and tolerance. If PGJ is happy and content that his home address is posted publicly, well, he said it here.
 
So, after unwittingly acknowledging his logical error, and after his attempts at distraction weren't fruitful, PGJ has decided to simply ignore it and hope it goes away. Those are definitely the actions of someone who is open to learning and who acknowledges his mistakes.
 
ProgrammingGodJordan said:
I could likewise go to other sites and dig up other public data concerning other members here.

..but why would I, given that would be irrelevant to thought curvature's advancement?
Click to expand...

Sure, but that would be information INTENTIONALLY SHARED.

You, on the other hand, posted your home address it the web address field so that anyone gets your home address.

Are you happy and content to share that? Yes or no?
 
abaddon said:
So, I looked at the responses PGJ posted from this Mordred fellow.

I noticed that they are private messages and thus there is no way for anyone to check them for accuracy.

What to do, what to do? Well, since they are from scienceforums, let's pay a visit. I'm not a member there, so I will only see whatever is publicly available. So I did.
One quick search later, I got to here.

Boy was that uncanny. The same topics posted. The same copypasta posts complete with rainbow fontasia. The same replies from members there. It was as if I was still here.

Have fun.


ETA: Bet he didn't ask Mordred for permission either.
Click to expand...

Old news, I had long posted links to science forums on this thread...

Small nitpick: There was no worthless discussion of synonyms in my "Supermathematics and Artificial General Intelligence" thread there. (So no, not the "same" responses, and it was definitely not as if you were there)
http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/...al-intelligence/?tab=comments#comment-1011765

The above lead to a conversation held between myself and Mordred, via dm.
 
Last edited:
Just an aside on the rules here, Rule 8 is as follows:

8. You may only post a Member's personal information if it is both publicly available and is relevant to the ongoing discussion

The first half of the above is clearly met. However, it would be difficult to find any reason to think that PGJ's home address is relevant to the subject of the thread, and so anyone tempted to post the publicly available information would, in my view, be taking a big risk with their ongoing membership of the forum. IANOM, of course, just someone who values the contribution many here make and wouldn't want to see too many more leave.
 
Last edited:
ProgrammingGodJordan said:
A good portion of those forums banned me, because I called a few people retarded...
Click to expand...

And yet you persisted in making the same mistake on subsequent forums and insisted upon using the word here to describe the content of the post.

Learning from your past mistakes does not appear to be one of your strong suits.
 
MikeG said:
Just an aside on the rules here, Rule 8 is as follows:

8. You may only post a Member's personal information if it is both publicly available and is relevant to the ongoing discussion

The first half of the above is clearly met. However, it would be difficult to find any reason to think that PGJ's home address is relevant to the subject of the thread, and so anyone tempted to post the publicly available information would, in my view, be taking a big risk with their ongoing membership of the forum. IANOM, of course, just someone who values the contribution many here make and wouldn't want to see too many more leave.
Click to expand...

This may be your first sensible post, as far as I can see.

My address is irrelevant now...
 
halleyscomet said:
And yet you persisted in making the same mistake on subsequent forums and insisted upon using the word here to describe the content of the post.

Learning from your past mistakes does not appear to be one of your strong suits.
Click to expand...

Well, as you've properly pointed out, instead of directing the word at members, I directed it at their content. (Although that rule seems quite silly, since it is the members themselves that are making the content)
 
Oh lordy lordy lordy.

Seriously, it's been explained to you so many times, retarded is an insult, calling people beings is an insult etc.

If you don't get it, you are either a bit slow, or just don't have any manners.

Or maybe you just like getting a rise out of people.

Which do you think it might be?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom