• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Artificial Intelligence Research: Supermathematics and Physics

So, I looked at the responses PGJ posted from this Mordred fellow.

I noticed that they are private messages and thus there is no way for anyone to check them for accuracy.

What to do, what to do? Well, since they are from scienceforums, let's pay a visit. I'm not a member there, so I will only see whatever is publicly available. So I did.
One quick search later, I got to here.

Boy was that uncanny. The same topics posted. The same copypasta posts complete with rainbow fontasia. The same replies from members there. It was as if I was still here.

Have fun.


ETA: Bet he didn't ask Mordred for permission either.

Tears. Just hysterical tears. A couple at random:

@The majority of the participants in this thread other than ProgrammingGodJordan. Your objective appears to be much more to criticise PGJ's writing skills (which I agree are in much need of criticism) rather than to understand what he is saying.

I am just focusing on the fact that his belief he can communicate in English is a false belief.

Hey PGJ, you forgot to include several pages of comments like these in your presented evidence that people have no problems understanding you.

Also, an interesting claim by PGJ:

PGJ said:
I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had invented some small degree of calculus in the past.

His link for this one goes 404, but I am sure he would want to elaborate on this one.
 
In which we put PGJ's language claims to the test

Also, an interesting claim by PGJ:

I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had invented some small degree of calculus in the past.

His link for this one goes 404, but I am sure he would want to elaborate on this one.

fortunately there's a decoder ring for PGJ. The thesaurus. I'll bet if we replace "invented" with synonyms for "invent" we will get a sentence better approximating what he was trying to say:

http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/invent

  1. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had bear some small degree of calculus in the past.
  2. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had come up with some small degree of calculus in the past.
  3. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had conceive some small degree of calculus in the past.
  4. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had design some small degree of calculus in the past.
  5. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had devise some small degree of calculus in the past.
  6. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had discover some small degree of calculus in the past.
  7. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had dream up some small degree of calculus in the past.
  8. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had envision some small degree of calculus in the past.
  9. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had fashion some small degree of calculus in the past.
  10. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had find some small degree of calculus in the past.
  11. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had forge some small degree of calculus in the past.
  12. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had formulate some small degree of calculus in the past.
  13. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had initiate some small degree of calculus in the past.
  14. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had originate some small degree of calculus in the past.
  15. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had produce some small degree of calculus in the past.
  16. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had ad-lib some small degree of calculus in the past.
  17. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had author some small degree of calculus in the past.
  18. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had coin some small degree of calculus in the past.
  19. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had compose some small degree of calculus in the past.
  20. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had contrive some small degree of calculus in the past.
  21. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had execute some small degree of calculus in the past.
  22. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had fake some small degree of calculus in the past.
  23. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had form some small degree of calculus in the past.
  24. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had frame some small degree of calculus in the past.
  25. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had hatch some small degree of calculus in the past.
  26. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had imagine some small degree of calculus in the past.
  27. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had improve some small degree of calculus in the past.
  28. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had improvise some small degree of calculus in the past.
  29. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had inaugurate some small degree of calculus in the past.
  30. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had jam some small degree of calculus in the past.
  31. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had make some small degree of calculus in the past.
  32. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had mint some small degree of calculus in the past.
  33. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had plan some small degree of calculus in the past.
  34. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had project some small degree of calculus in the past.
  35. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had wing some small degree of calculus in the past.
  36. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had bring into being some small degree of calculus in the past.
  37. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had come upon some small degree of calculus in the past.
  38. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had cook up some small degree of calculus in the past.
  39. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had knock off some small degree of calculus in the past.
  40. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had make up some small degree of calculus in the past.
  41. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had off-the-cuff some small degree of calculus in the past.
  42. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had toss off some small degree of calculus in the past.
  43. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had turn out some small degree of calculus in the past.

Please ignore the present tense conjugation in what was obviously a past tense sentence. A quick search and replace got me that far, but deciphering the sentence isn't worth the effort of conjugating each sentence.

Anyone care to guess which meaning PGJ had in mind?

To be fair, I'll put together a batch with synonyms for "invented." That list may provide a more intelligible sentence.
http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/invented

  1. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had assumed some small degree of calculus in the past.
  2. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had created some small degree of calculus in the past.
  3. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had fabricated some small degree of calculus in the past.
  4. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had fanciful some small degree of calculus in the past.
  5. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had fictional some small degree of calculus in the past.
  6. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had imaginary some small degree of calculus in the past.
  7. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had imagined some small degree of calculus in the past.
  8. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had made-up some small degree of calculus in the past.
  9. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had simulated some small degree of calculus in the past.
  10. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had unreal some small degree of calculus in the past.
  11. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had concocted some small degree of calculus in the past.
  12. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had counterfeit some small degree of calculus in the past.
  13. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had fake some small degree of calculus in the past.
  14. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had faked some small degree of calculus in the past.
  15. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had fashioned some small degree of calculus in the past.
  16. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had feigned some small degree of calculus in the past.
  17. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had improvised some small degree of calculus in the past.
  18. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had made some small degree of calculus in the past.
  19. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had misleading some small degree of calculus in the past.
  20. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had mock some small degree of calculus in the past.
  21. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had queer some small degree of calculus in the past.
  22. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had sham some small degree of calculus in the past.
  23. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had apocryphal some small degree of calculus in the past.
  24. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had artificial some small degree of calculus in the past.
  25. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had bogus some small degree of calculus in the past.
  26. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had chimerical some small degree of calculus in the past.
  27. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had cooked-up some small degree of calculus in the past.
  28. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had deceptive some small degree of calculus in the past.
  29. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had delusive some small degree of calculus in the past.
  30. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had delusory some small degree of calculus in the past.
  31. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had dishonest some small degree of calculus in the past.
  32. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had ersatz some small degree of calculus in the past.
  33. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had factitious some small degree of calculus in the past.
  34. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had false some small degree of calculus in the past.
  35. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had fantastic some small degree of calculus in the past.
  36. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had fantastical some small degree of calculus in the past.
  37. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had fictive some small degree of calculus in the past.
  38. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had figmental some small degree of calculus in the past.
  39. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had hyped up some small degree of calculus in the past.
  40. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had illusory some small degree of calculus in the past.
  41. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had make-believe some small degree of calculus in the past.
  42. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had mythical some small degree of calculus in the past.
  43. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had phony some small degree of calculus in the past.
  44. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had romantic some small degree of calculus in the past.
  45. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had spurious some small degree of calculus in the past.
  46. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had suppositious some small degree of calculus in the past.
  47. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had supposititious some small degree of calculus in the past.
  48. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had synthetic some small degree of calculus in the past.
  49. I know how to isolate symbols and analyse them too, because I had trumped-up some small degree of calculus in the past.

Ohhh, that's MUCH more interesting.

Remember, as PGJ asserted in the infamous "beings" vs "people" incident, these synonyms are interchangeable. Any one of these will be as accurate a representation of PGJ's meaning as any other.
 
Last edited:
This is just the gift which keeps on giving.

Turns out that our friend has been to SGU. Again, not a member there, so only public information

The Witten stuff again
Humans are minimally capable Gods (written by an atheist)
Why belief is non-necessary (written by inventor of "non beliefism")
Why do scientists believe in science? And more.

His demise there was interesting, socks aplenty.

I AM a member there. While not very active these days, I've been on friendly terms with some of the moderators.

Any questions you'd like me to ask?

I notice he got criticized for playing word games there as well. His problem with writing as if synonyms were universally interchangeable appears to be a problem of long standing. I wonder if my post above will help him understand this is not necessarily true in all cases.
 
Last edited:
I AM a member there. While not very active these days, I've been on friendly terms with some of the moderators.

Any questions you'd like me to ask?

I notice he got criticized for playing word games there as well. His problem with writing as if synonyms were universally interchangeable appears to be a problem of long standing. I wonder if my post above will help him understand this is not necessarily true in all cases.
Not really, That pointed me on to thinkatheist where apparently the very same spam has been posted, my next port of call.

One thought that did occur to me is that as an occasional lurker, I may have regged an account there at some point in the dim and distant. You could check if I did, because I don't recall it.
 
Not really, That pointed me on to thinkatheist where apparently the very same spam has been posted, my next port of call.

One thought that did occur to me is that as an occasional lurker, I may have regged an account there at some point in the dim and distant. You could check if I did, because I don't recall it.

You do not come up in a member search.
 
OK I am going to stop at that.

Think Atheist and more.

In summary, yes, same spam crap at thinkatheist and, in fact, the sheer scale of the many sites spammed is evidence of a strange compulsion. All of them have much the same responses. Roughly, half have handed out bans and half have not. I a list to use by now.

Why stop now when I am on a roll? Well, on one of his earlier victim sites, he naively posted too much data in his public profile. That would be uncomfortably close to doxxing. I am not going there.

I suppose, PGJ may not even recall doing it given he has posted his spam on so many sites.

If PGJ wishes to PM me, I will identify the site to him and him alone (so everyone else can get lost :) ) otherwise, I will not be getting into any of that.
 
OK I am going to stop at that.

Think Atheist and more.

In summary, yes, same spam crap at thinkatheist and, in fact, the sheer scale of the many sites spammed is evidence of a strange compulsion. All of them have much the same responses. Roughly, half have handed out bans and half have not. I a list to use by now.

Why stop now when I am on a roll? Well, on one of his earlier victim sites, he naively posted too much data in his public profile. That would be uncomfortably close to doxxing. I am not going there.

I suppose, PGJ may not even recall doing it given he has posted his spam on so many sites.

If PGJ wishes to PM me, I will identify the site to him and him alone (so everyone else can get lost :) ) otherwise, I will not be getting into any of that.

You've demonstrated that this is a repeating pattern for him with no sign of change. The fact that this cycle has been repeated so many times with little to no variation is disturbing to say the least. Even if this is an act, it's a strange one. Clearly, the ideas about AI and physics that are the overt excuse for his posts are not his real agenda. If they were, he'd have done something to address the chronic communication issues he keeps having on multiple sites.

He's accused his critics of jumping on a bandwagon. I wonder if he suspects some sort of multi-site bandwagon and if so, what he thinks its purpose it.
 
You've demonstrated that this is a repeating pattern for him with no sign of change. The fact that this cycle has been repeated so many times with little to no variation is disturbing to say the least. Even if this is an act, it's a strange one. Clearly, the ideas about AI and physics that are the overt excuse for his posts are not his real agenda. If they were, he'd have done something to address the chronic communication issues he keeps having on multiple sites.

He's accused his critics of jumping on a bandwagon. I wonder if he suspects some sort of multi-site bandwagon and if so, what he thinks its purpose it.

As Yoda would say "Difficult to see, the motivation is."

Everywhere he goes, he gets the same response. Nobody can make head nor tail of his quixotic language usage, even though everywhere he goes, people try to explain it to him. On top of that, he seems genuinely unable to understand the problem. I mentioned the sock-puppetry on SGU. I have seen the few posts his socks made before getting banned. They were exactly the same as any of his other posts complete with pointless images and colours. He didn't seem to care. "ProgrammingGodJordan/iChicken/tears of face palm/thought_fuhk have been banned" all identical in post format with the epic comment "And member iChicken has been plucked for being a sockpuppet of PB&J.".

It's like he is simply unaware. Why? Beats me.
 
fortunately there's a decoder ring for PGJ. The thesaurus. I'll bet if we replace "invented" with synonyms for "invent" we will get a sentence better approximating what he was trying to say:

http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/invent

Please ignore the present tense conjugation in what was obviously a past tense sentence. A quick search and replace got me that far, but deciphering the sentence isn't worth the effort of conjugating each sentence.

Anyone care to guess which meaning PGJ had in mind?

To be fair, I'll put together a batch with synonyms for "invented." That list may provide a more intelligible sentence.
http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/invented



Ohhh, that's MUCH more interesting.

Remember, as PGJ asserted in the infamous "beings" vs "people" incident, these synonyms are interchangeable. Any one of these will be as accurate a representation of PGJ's meaning as any other.

Surprisingly, there are a number of people who like to play synonym games, as I outlined here.

I notice however, that helpful answers don't preclude irrelevant synonym discussions.
 
OK I am going to stop at that.

Think Atheist and more.

In summary, yes, same spam crap at thinkatheist and, in fact, the sheer scale of the many sites spammed is evidence of a strange compulsion. All of them have much the same responses. Roughly, half have handed out bans and half have not. I a list to use by now.

Why stop now when I am on a roll? Well, on one of his earlier victim sites, he naively posted too much data in his public profile. That would be uncomfortably close to doxxing. I am not going there.

I suppose, PGJ may not even recall doing it given he has posted his spam on so many sites.

If PGJ wishes to PM me, I will identify the site to him and him alone (so everyone else can get lost :) ) otherwise, I will not be getting into any of that.

I don't have a physics degree, so I scour the internet in search of knowledge, when I am not busy at work.

Notably, some forums are worth the socks.

This has helped to improve thought curvature.
 
I don't have a physics degree, so I scour the internet in search of knowledge, when I am not busy at work.

Notably, some forums are worth the socks.

This has helped to improve thought curvature.
Are you not paying attention?

You have publicly published personal data on a site that I bet you do not want to BE PUBLIC.

I am offering to help you by telling you in PM where that is so that you can fix it.

I am telling you, and you alone, nobody else.

CAN YOU NOT READ???
 

Back
Top Bottom