Ziggurat
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2003
- Messages
- 61,560
A crime isn't actually required. Support for terrorist activity can suffice for deportation, even if it's not otherwise criminal.I notice a remarkable lack of evidence of a crime.
A crime isn't actually required. Support for terrorist activity can suffice for deportation, even if it's not otherwise criminal.I notice a remarkable lack of evidence of a crime.
Even assuming he did, ideologically promoting Hamas is not a crime.Organized and participated in protest rallies at Columbia, where he distributed literature promoting Hamas.
...Indeed, a White House official told The Free Press that the basis for targeting Khalil is being used as a blueprint for investigations against other students.
Khalil is a “threat to the foreign policy and national security interests of the United States,” said the official, noting that this calculation was the driving force behind the arrest. “
The allegation here is not that he was breaking the law,” said the official...
The bar may be higher for permanent residents. I guess we'll find out.A crime isn't actually required. Support for terrorist activity can suffice for deportation, even if it's not otherwise criminal.
I'm pretty sure the exact agency doesn't matter, for jurisdiction. It's whether the federal government has jurisdiction. The idea that Immigration and Customs Enforcement can't arrest people suspected of terrorist associations seems to be entirely invented.Across the country in the custody of an agency that does not have jurisdiction?
Agreed.There are federal detention facilities in Manhattan and Brooklyn. Even if ICE had jurisdiction, there is a facility in Orange County, about 90 minutes north and in Elizabeth, NJ about the same to the west.
They who? Claimed where?They claimed they had a warrant.
Begging the question.Across the country in the custody of an agency that does not have jurisdiction?
In court? Sure. Pursuant to a FOIA request? Sure. And again, a warrant is not usually necessary for an arrest.They are entitled to see the warrant.
Of course I can; I just did. What you mean is I can't convince you it's justified. Good thing convincing you was never my goal.You can't justify this
I wonder what the ratio of people who love this ◊◊◊◊ is to people who don't really like that this happened, but suffer from an obsessive need to defend or handwave everything their cult leader does. I imagine some trumpkin reading about the student being arrested, putting their head in their hands for a few seconds, sighing deeply, and getting to work defending, excusing, or misrepresenting the arrest and disappearance. Then a few days or weeks pass and they'll have internalized that the arrest was neccessary and/or okay for some reason, or Dump and the fascists will come up with something else to grab the headlines and the cult will forget about the whole thing.
They're "making sense" of it by going full brownshirt. Mahmoud is an "untermenschen" and went against their fuhrer so he deserves everything.If Mahmoud had a warrant for his arrest from New Jersey, it would have taken more work to extradite him than it did to ship him off to Louisiana. It is still unclear why he was moved to Louisiana in the first place (outside the obvious nefarious reasons), but I'm not gonna hold out hope that the resident Republicans will be able to make sense of this obvious government overreach.
So they're doing him because he's a modern day Sophie Scholl.
You can argue about the message he is sending and who he is supporting, but this was a White House official stating that it isn't about him breaking any laws. It really is about the message he is delivering.So they're doing him because he's a modern day Sophie Scholl.
Nice inversion you've got going there. Someone who supports terrorist murder of Jews is totally like an anti-Nazi activist. And getting deported is totally like getting executed.So they're doing him because he's a modern day Sophie Scholl.
As I said, a modern day Sophie Scholl.You can argue about the message he is sending and who he is supporting, but this was a White House official stating that it isn't about him breaking any laws. It really is about the message he is delivering.
And? Are you saying that we shouldn't deport foreign nationals who advocate terrorism?You can argue about the message he is sending and who he is supporting, but this was a White House official stating that it isn't about him breaking any laws. It really is about the message he is delivering.
There were some posts earlier in the thread talking about what crimes we may or may not have committed. I just thought that a White House Official specifically saying that it was not about any crimes was relevant.And? Are you saying that we shouldn't deport foreign nationals who advocate terrorism?
That seems... dumb.
The law allows deportation of green card holders under certain conditions even without crimes.There were some posts earlier in the thread talking about what crimes we may or may not have committed. I just thought that a White House Official specifically saying that it was not about any crimes was relevant.
For good or bad, the Executive Branch is saying that they are trying to deport this guy based on what he was saying, not based on any criminal activity.
Who are you referring to? Khalil did no such thing. You must be referring to some of the Charlottesville or J6 terrorists.Nice inversion you've got going there. Someone who supports terrorist murder of Jews is totally like an anti-Nazi activist.
It is a silly comparison. Now, getting your TV show canceled, THAT is like an execution.And getting deported is totally like getting executed.
The First Amendment seems to contradict some of those conditions.The law allows deportation of green card holders under certain conditions even without crimes.
First, this sounds like even more right-wing fantasy presented as fact. Yesterday, he was a committer of felonies. Today, it's been downgraded to "supporting terrorism." I'm sure this one is just as true. Go ahead and quote him if you can.And? Are you saying that we shouldn't deport foreign nationals who advocate terrorism?
How sure are you of that?Who are you referring to? Khalil did no such thing.