Merged 2024 Election Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
It does create employed people, which inflates employment (deflates unemployment).

That is counter to my understanding of how unemployment is calculated. These folks would not be counted as unemployed so long as they were unable to enter the workforce.

My understanding is that keeping more of them out of these jobs would have been a better way to juice the numbers as it would have lead to more of the jobs being filled by people who were counted as unemployed.

But it also highlights the fact that there are people who need jobs who aren't supposed to need jobs.

Need or want? Either way, I think you are saying that it points to the benefits not being sufficient. If so, I agree. Something I’m sure we can trust the GOP to fix by removing such benefits.
 
In economy news -

The strong U.S. job market is in a ‘sweet spot,’ economists say

The U.S. economy added 303,000 jobs in March, the largest gain in more than a year, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said in its monthly jobs report.
The unemployment rate also edged lower, to 3.8%.
It’s a bit harder for workers to find jobs relative to the “great resignation” era a few years ago.
But overall, the labor market looks healthy and sustainable and is giving inflation-adjusted raises to the average worker, economists said.

Wage growth has declined, to an annual 4.1% pace in March from a pandemic-era peak of 5.9% in March 2022, on average. But inflation has fallen more than that, which translates to an increase in household buying power since May 2023.

Real hourly earnings — wages after accounting for inflation — grew by 1.1% in February 2024 versus a year earlier.

The current labor market is in many ways more desirable than the red-hot one a few years ago, which wasn’t sustainable, economists said.

There's more details in the article, but, in short, things quite look to be moving in a good direction.
 
Last edited:
The trouble is perception vs reality. Try getting people to believe that who are hearing over and over again how bad inflation is from the fear mongers .
Even if they have to superglue their fingers in their ears and scream LALALALALA! at full volume consonantly while awake, there are none so deaf as those who will not hear.
 
As always, it's the Republican's job to destroy the economy, and the Democrat's job to fix it.
That's why we have to change leadership regularly, or the cycle wouldn't continue.
 
Trump keeps repeating the economy is so good because everyone responsible for the good numbers is predicting he'll win the election.

:eusa_sick:
 
Last edited:
Trump abortion video went badly with MAGA base. Somehow it's Lindsay Graham's fault.

Why is a gay Republican deciding reproductive health anyway?
 
This election cycle is going to really be something to watch. After last time, where we were told that Trump is the most Hitlery human that ever lived, aside from Hitler himself.

This time around, he's going to have to be even more Hitlery, surpassing even Hitler in his likeness to Hitler.
 
This election cycle is going to really be something to watch. After last time, where we were told that Trump is the most Hitlery human that ever lived, aside from Hitler himself.

This time around, he's going to have to be even more Hitlery, surpassing even Hitler in his likeness to Hitler.

It's not like the comparisons are any less true, this time around. Given the way that he's leaning further into similar CTs as Hitler did, it's even more true, for that matter. "Poisoning the blood" and calling immigrants animals, among other things, has entered the realm of outright Nazi propaganda.

You might be willing to forget his promises to put millions of people into concentration camps so that the undesirables can be disposed of, one way or another, but promises like that only strengthen how much he's a would be Hitler.
 
It's not like the comparisons are any less true, this time around. Given the way that he's leaning further into similar CTs as Hitler did, it's even more true, for that matter. "Poisoning the blood" and calling immigrants animals, among other things, has entered the realm of outright Nazi propaganda.

You might be willing to forget his promises to put millions of people into concentration camps so that the undesirables can be disposed of, one way or another, but promises like that only strengthen how much he's a would be Hitler.

Interestingly, given that I only really actively consume right-wing news and media (instapundit, Armstrong and Getty, and things of that nature), I haven't been hearing that much about Trump. He's probably getting more coverage on the alphabet networks right now.

Whenever I see claims like those in bold above, I'm in the habit of assuming they're fake and never bother to look into it. This is based on past experience. The Boy who Cried Wolf and all that.
 
Interestingly, given that I only really actively consume right-wing news and media (instapundit, Armstrong and Getty, and things of that nature), I haven't been hearing that much about Trump.

why are they not covering a presidential candidate who’s also under a bunch of felony charges? seems important
 
Interestingly, given that I only really actively consume right-wing news and media (instapundit, Armstrong and Getty, and things of that nature), I haven't been hearing that much about Trump. He's probably getting more coverage on the alphabet networks right now.

Whenever I see claims like those in bold above, I'm in the habit of assuming they're fake and never bother to look into it. This is based on past experience. The Boy who Cried Wolf and all that.

*shrug* Living in a bubble it is, then. It's not surprising for you to assume that claims like those are fake and not worth examining further, of course, given how far too many right-wing outlets lack concern for truth, but it's worth remembering that the alphabet networks and the rest of reputable media do tend to have far more concern for demonstrable truth when it comes to their reporting.

Regarding the bolded -

Trump calls migrants 'animals,' intensifying focus on illegal immigration

The specific quote referred to is -

The Democrats say, 'Please don't call them animals. They're humans.' I said, 'No, they're not humans, they're not humans, they're animals,

As for his promises to put millions into concentration camps -

Former U.S. President Donald Trump, if re-elected in 2024, would expand his first-term immigration crackdown to include sweeping roundups of people who would be held in large camps to await deportation, the New York Times reported on Saturday.

The report was based on interviews with several advisers, including Stephen Miller, who oversaw Trump's first-term immigration policies, the Times said.

It described Trump's plans as "an assault on immigration on a scale unseen in modern American history" and said it aimed to deport millions of people every year, including those who have been settled in the United States for decades.

While one may argue that it's not Trump himself specifically promising concentration camps for millions there, that's a technicality, at best. With that said, he has promised to do the "largest domestic deportation operation in American history" without the specifics of how.

Further, in the not so distant past of 2022, Trump was pointedly advocating for rounding up the homeless and putting them in concentration camps.

“Perhaps some people will not like hearing this, but the only way you’re going to remove the hundreds of thousands of people, and maybe throughout our nation millions of people,...is open up large parcels of inexpensive land in the outer reaches of the cities, bring in medical professionals…build permanent bathrooms and other facilities, make ‘em good, make ‘em hard, but build them fast, and build thousands and thousands of high-quality tents, which can be done in one day. One day. You have to move people out.”

Trump really just is that bad. To add to that, he was literally taught to use the same tactics as the Nazis used by his mentor, Roy Cohn. He's using very similar tactics as Hitler used to gain power. Much the same groups are aiding and abetting him, for remarkably similar reasons. It's no surprise that right-wing news and media wouldn't be interested in covering just how bad Trump really is, though. It's not stuff that much of their target audience wants to hear and highlighting it would be likely to lead to unpleasant backlash against them.

I'm still reminded of a radio show host who was fired mid show for offering mild criticism of Trump. I just don't think very highly of how "free speech" and "principle" actually works on right-wing outlets.

Separately, on a quick check, instapundit is not exactly a wise choice of sources to offer much trust, incidentally.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom