TragicMonkey
Poisoned Waffles
He's not lying, he's drawing a logical conclusion that you aren't drawing, about use of human shields. Using human shields in conflict is absolutely abhorrent, right? And should be stopped? How can it be stopped? Not by giving in to the demands of those doing it, or by ceasing hostilities: that would only further encourage the practice. The ultimate logical conclusion is that the only way to truly stop the use of human shields is to attack anyway. Make the practice pointless by never letting it work. Harsh? Yes. But that's part of conflict, especially ones that get nasty enough that somebody tries using human shields.You are wrong, and now you are deliberately lying. You are using misrepresentation to make my entirely reasonable view that everybody in this situation is a moral monster sound like I am the moral monster. Why? Why do you lie about me? What do you have against me personally that you want to make me look like the worst person in the world? What did I ever do to you? When did I lie about you?
You think I'm taking it personally? Damn right I am. You have made it personal by deliberately and maliciously lying.
You're not taking that final step in reasoning so from your perspective there's still some way out of the situation without hurting anybody. Theprestige has taken that final step in reasoning so from his perspective you'd be letting the abhorrent practice continue (if you were in charge during such a conflict, anyway). So to you he seems cruel and to him you seem cruel.
Now both shake hands and promise to not use human shields in any future conflict between you.