• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Windows 11

The only use I ever had for widgets was I liked having a nearly transparent clock floating in a corner as I lose track of time easily. I would still use that.

I am sure a senior exec in Microsoft has a fetish for widgets as they keep trying to get them into Windows only for them to be removed in the next update as useless. :)

I suspect this version of widgets is because they want to make the OS as similar on different form factors as possible - so if you are using a tablet that runs Windows 11 you have the expected widgets that go with that form factor.
 
The only use I ever had for widgets was I liked having a nearly transparent clock floating in a corner as I lose track of time easily. I would still use that.

You have time on the taskbar these days. Indeed I think it is what makes the centred taskbar icons in Windows look so ugly - the far right one is a double line of plain text, they should have created a style for that that links into the iconic style of the rest of the taskbar.
 
I already have my taskbar centered. Hopefully in 5 years it will just give me an excuse to buy a new machine :)
 
You have time on the taskbar these days. Indeed I think it is what makes the centred taskbar icons in Windows look so ugly - the far right one is a double line of plain text, they should have created a style for that that links into the iconic style of the rest of the taskbar.


I also like to auto-hide my taskbar. Yes, I know it's not Burger King "My way" but I like as few visual distractions as possible when coding. Since I also have a family life I need low profile clock as a necessary distraction.
 
That will be 10 years of supporting a product, I don't think that is an unreasonably short time.

Plus knowing MS's past there will still be critical patches issued.

Plus knowing MS's past there will still need to be critical patches issued.
;)
 
If people are going to struggle with a rather minor update to Windows Linux is going to be well beyond them!


I guess you haven't tried it since a decade or two. Linux 2021 is not what it used to be. Trivial to install and run on a desktop. No need to go under the hood, at least not more often than with this Windows nonsense.

But I digress. I just HAVE to put a penguin in threads like this. :thumbsup:;)
 
I guess you haven't tried it since a decade or two. Linux 2021 is not what it used to be. Trivial to install and run on a desktop. No need to go under the hood, at least not more often than with this Windows nonsense.

Nope use it a lot and nope no way is someone going to cope with moving to Linux if they can't cope with this Windows upgrade.

But I digress. I just HAVE to put a penguin in threads like this. :thumbsup:;)

Of course. Waiting for the apple.
 
That will be 10 years of supporting a product, I don't think that is an unreasonably short time.


I don't disagree with that. But the difference this time is the rather significant number of machines that are unable to upgrade to the new version.

As I mentioned. My two year old laptop has TPM 2.0 enabled and is still not able to install Win 11.

Plus knowing MS's past there will still be critical patches issued.


One can but hope.
 
Last edited:
I don't disagree with that. But the difference this time is the rather significant number of machines that are unable to upgrade to the new version.

As I mentioned. My two year old laptop has TPM 2.0 enabled and is still not able to install Win 11.




One can but hope.

I think there will be a lot of feedback like yours and from the general beta release which starts I think later this week. I expect a lot of these strange incompatibilities will be ironed out before release.
 
Skype is just being integrated into "Teams", which is now going to be part of the OS itself. They're introducing a bunch of widgets.

And in the old days I certainly never used to have a folder that featured programmes that I don't use and don't want and which either can't be uninstalled, or if they can then are automatically re-installed every update.

You're right that in literally the last couple of months they've finally listened to the cries of users and reduced a tiny amount of the bloat. But that's a small step back from a decades-long trend.

Well, I think the reality is that OS's expand to fill available disk, memory, processor cycles and hard drive space. Microsoft OS's for sure, though others are not completely exempt.
 
The only use I ever had for widgets was I liked having a nearly transparent clock floating in a corner as I lose track of time easily. I would still use that.

I never see my desktop, so it would be useless to me. Even more so now that you launch the widgets from a button on the task bar...which also has a clock on it. I have the task bar hidden, but I have a clock on my browser, and it's easy enough to move my pointer to the bottom of the screen to activate the task bar or, more commonly, to simply look at my watch.
 
Well, I think the reality is that OS's expand to fill available disk, memory, processor cycles and hard drive space. Microsoft OS's for sure, though others are not completely exempt.

I think it's more that people in companies come up with ideas that they think are great and can't quite imagine other people wanting anything different. I think that pretty much explains why everybody at Microsoft was so excited for Windows 8, even though it was clearly a terrible OS packed with features that people didn't want.

I think it also explains many of Apple's bizarre choices - there's this idea of the "Apple culture", that some of the more fervent customers buy in to as well, which is sort of "our opinions are the correct ones" and it's very hard to turn the ship. Which is why, for example, you only got a dark mode on ios less than two years ago, despite it having been standard on every other OS for years.

I think there's a lot of that "corporate culture" stuff that goes on in big tech, where the people who make the decisions or who are in positions to get their ideas listened to are rather out of touch with how people actually use their machines and/or have a "no, it's the children who are wrong" attitude about it. It's an "I think a widget with the latest stock prices on it would be really cool, therefore it's a good idea", even if most people don't invest in stocks and the majority of those who do wouldn't be using a widget on their desktop to monitor them.
 
As for Linux, it's something I've always been interested in trying, but I've never had the impetus and there's always the "I have programmes that wouldn't run on it" problem. My current machine isn't compatible with Windows 11, apparently, but I'm not bothered enough about upgrading to find out why. I expect it's that security chip thing, but I also expect I do have one installed. Perhaps in 4 years, when Windows 10 will stop getting updates I'll look in to Linux. My brother is an IT guy who specialises in Linux, so even if I get stuck it should be pretty easy. But I'll definitely look into what I'd need to upgrade first because, as I say, I've got plenty of programmes that wouldn't run on it.

And, yes, I know that there are equivalent programmes but, for example, GIMP isn't Photoshop, even though I use it for a couple of things here and there because there are some things it does better. And, yes, I can create a virtual machine that runs Windows, but if I'm going to do that, then wouldn't it be simpler just to run Windows?
 
Not being able to move the taskbar is a little disappointing to me. I like having it up the left side - vertical real estate is for me more valuable than horizontal, since my monitors are invariably oriented in landscape.

Skype is just being integrated into "Teams", which is now going to be part of the OS itself. They're introducing a bunch of widgets.
Teams is better than Skype in every way. I think if Skype had been allowed to continue being supported and developed, it eventually would have ended up much like Teams is now.
 
I just hope they make it smaller, including Windows updates in smaller, discrete lumps. Win10 is so full of bloatware and inefficient code that it no longer fits on my 30GB travel laptop leaving enough space to allow updates. And the "disk" is soldered to the mobo, so I can't upgrade it.

Attached is an image of Microsoft considering your proposal.
 

Attachments

  • Laughing.jpg
    Laughing.jpg
    12.1 KB · Views: 174
Teams is better than Skype in every way. I think if Skype had been allowed to continue being supported and developed, it eventually would have ended up much like Teams is now.

I've not used either so I can't speak to that but it's certainly not uncommon for a big corporation to buy a smaller company's product, take what they want from it, and then kill the original app (see Apple buying Dark Sky), or just scrap it all together to kill a competitor.

The point is that they're not reducing bloatware by getting rid of Skype, they are in fact increasing it by making Teams an integral part of the OS which you can't get rid of, even if you don't use it. It'll be more like Cortana than Skype.
 

Back
Top Bottom