• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Wikileaks

RedIbis said:
At least you answered a direct question with a direct answer. Did you follow the links? The wikileak contained a signed document from Hillary Clinton:



If not indictments, you would certainly support an investigation into Zelikow's obstruction into investigating Saudi AQ financing links, no?
Click to expand...
So now you're also admitting the existence of al Qaeda?
 
Saudi Al Queda links wouldn't surprise me in the least.

What does that have do to with 9/11 being an "inside job"?
 
A world view is a precious thing, earned with experience. It just seems a shame to have an ill-conceived one
 
triforcharity said:
So, one person? How unamazing.



Isn't she the Sec. of State now? Why hasn't she done something since then?
Click to expand...

So at this point in all of your extensive research, you don't think there's much to the charge that Saudi Arabia was/is financing AQ?

And after all of your extensive research, you still don't think Zelikow was instrumental in covering it up?

I'm not entirely sure you even know who Zelikow is.
 
RedIbis said:
So at this point in all of your extensive research, you don't think there's much to the charge that Saudi Arabia was/is financing AQ?

And after all of your extensive research, you still don't think Zelikow was instrumental in covering it up?

I'm not entirely sure you even know who Zelikow is.
Click to expand...

Why hasn't the Sec. of State done anything about it? Wouldn't she be just as guilty of covering it up?

I wonder why that is......:rolleyes:
 
triforcharity said:
Why hasn't the Sec. of State done anything about it? Wouldn't she be just as guilty of covering it up?

I wonder why that is......:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

For the same reason Obama hasn't done anything about the Bush administration's approval of torture. Politics.
 
RedIbis said:
For the same reason Obama hasn't done anything about the Bush administration's approval of torture. Politics.
Click to expand...

But yet, she was willing to bring it up at one point, but now that she has a much higher position, and an authority to do something about it......nothing.

Gotcha.
 
Dave Rogers said:
At the very least, I think most of us strongly suspect that a faction of fifteen specific Saudis supported it...

Dave
Click to expand...

At the very least indeed.

Do you think Zelikow obstructed investigations into Saudi financing of AQ?
 
RedIbis said:
Do you think Zelikow obstructed investigations into Saudi financing of AQ?
Click to expand...
Maybe he was playing partisan hack politics? Then again, this probably goes in the opposite direction of where you think the 9/11 attacks came from.
 
Here's what a Kook said at the stupid Ickes forum:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=141931&page=48

Post #: 475

WikiLeaks is a CIA plot to restrict the Internet from the public, to control the masses with lies from the govt/military. It is all BS, as are you & your troll buddies.

WIKIleaks is as much a farce as the underwear bomber set up by the CIA to sell $150,000 scanners for the perps to make more lying money, force dehumanization of the masses by TSA groping and forcing probable death by exposure to radiation from airport scanners. Homeland Security is BS, Wikileaks is BS, you & your troll buddies are BS. You are probably all the same person.
Click to expand...

Talk about being brainwashed by stupidity.

Sure, we're all the "same person" you Kook! :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
DGM said:
Why on earth would you post on that site? Have you heard the old saying;

"Don't argue with crazy people, bye-standers might find it hard to tell who's who"


Just saying.

;)
Click to expand...

Actually I can't post there because they "Banned" me. Like I give a **** anymore! :D

I've heard that saying some where, but can't pin point it.

But anyways, we all know that the David Icke's Forum is just like the Loose Change Forum, their 1 rule is:

"If you don't agree with us, you will be suspended or possibly banned. We will make up allegations & accuse you of trolling/spamming & abusing our forum for nothing."

They're all a bunch of losers, including the moderators. The moderators are paid to suspend & ban researchers who prove their members wrong, damn shills.

Here's their reason for banning me:

You have been banned for the following reason:
No reason was specified.
Date the ban will be lifted: Never
Click to expand...

The Moderators there are paid shills, they are paid to censor researchers.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom