• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Wikileaks

WildCat said:
Doesn't your question imply that there were actually 19 Arab terrorists who brought down the plane?

Is this your new position Red?
Click to expand...

No. My position has always considered the possibility of well financed Arab stooges.
 
RedIbis said:
No. My position has always considered the possibility of well financed Arab stooges.
Click to expand...

Of course. That way if you are right you can say, "I told you so", and if you are wrong you can say, "I was only considering the possibility". Nice.

So why don't you chastise these no planer morons talking their space beams, holographic planes, etc? Or do you consider the possibility of reverse-engineered alien technology too?
 
Politicians played politics in a report that threatened to place blame on the other political party!?

Terrorists are still exploiting Saudi Arabia!? Middle Eastern countries having back door deals with said jihadists!?

Shocking I tells ya! SHOCKING!!!

Just for the record, the government really sucks at keeping that stuff a secret for long periods of time. Not sure why this would be particularly earth shattering news....
 
dtugg said:
What is your position?

(RedIbis will not give a straight answer to this question)
Click to expand...

The possibility of well financed stooges. Now take a shot at my very specific question.

Do you think Zelikow should be indicted for obstruction of justice considering these revelations? If not, why not?
 
RedIbis said:
The possibility of well financed stooges. Now take a shot at my very specific question.

Do you think Zelikow should be indicted for obstruction of justice considering these revelations? If not, why not?
Click to expand...


And RedIbis didn't give a straight answer to the question. Now there is a huge shocker. :rollseyes:

And I'll start answering questions from you the moment you go back and answer the many, many questions you have dodged over the past few years.
 
dtugg said:
And RedIbis didn't give a straight answer to the question. Now there is a huge shocker. :rollseyes:

And I'll start answering questions from you the moment you go back and answer the many, many questions you have dodged over the past few years.
Click to expand...

I answered, you're just being petulant because I didn't answer the way you wanted and you don't want to have to answer a specific question.
 
RedIbis said:
I answered, you're just being petulant because I didn't answer the way you wanted and you don't want to have to answer a specific question.
Click to expand...

Only in RedIbisWorld could "The possibility of well financed stooges" possibily be a straight answer to the question "what is your position" which was a response to "My position has always considered the possibility of well financed Arab stooges".

And I don't have a problem with the specific question. I have a problem when shockingly dishonest people who alway dodge inconvinient questions demand that others asnwer questions.
 
triforcharity said:
No. Not enough proof. You haven't met even the basic rules of evidence.
Click to expand...

At least you answered a direct question with a direct answer. Did you follow the links? The wikileak contained a signed document from Hillary Clinton:

More needs to be done since Saudi Arabia remains a critical financial support base for al-Qaida, the Taliban, LeT and other terrorist groups," says a secret December 2009 paper signed by the US secretary of state. Her memo urged US diplomats to redouble their efforts to stop Gulf money reaching extremists in Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Click to expand...

If not indictments, you would certainly support an investigation into Zelikow's obstruction into investigating Saudi AQ financing links, no?
 
http://www.vrijspreker.nl/wp/2010/1...in-blijkt-militante-feministe-met-cia-banden/

This golddigger named Anna Ardin turns out to be militant feminist with CIA connections.

http://www.nujij.nl/verkrachtings-slachtoffer-van-assange-had.10612582.lynkx

De mogelijk door Julian Assange verkrachtte vrouw Anna Ardin
heeft mogelijk banden met de CIA, verder heeft ze na de "daad" trots SMS-jes verstuurd met daarin juichende teksten over de noeste vrijpartij
met de Wikileaks oprichter Assange. De tekst van de SMS-jes zal later openbaar gemaakt worden
Click to expand...

After Ardin was 'raped' she send several SMS messages with jubilant descriptions of the hot encounter with Assange.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/assange-rape-accuser-cia-ties/
About ties between Ardin and CIA.

While in Cuba, Ardin worked with the Las damas de blanco (the Ladies in White), a feminist anti-Castro group. Professor Michael Seltzer pointed out that the group is led by Carlos Alberto Montaner who is reportedly connected to the CIA.
Click to expand...

And then the hammer, a google cached version of Ardin's blog with tips how to legally frame men you don't like.

I think this is going to backfire mightily against this swindler... and the US!
Where is the encryption key?
 
And then something fishy:

http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2010/12/07/18665978.php

There are no leaks about Israel. Assange said that he had struck a deal with Bibbi not to leak!!???

According to new revelations, Assange had allegedly struck a deal with Israel before the recent 'cable gate', which may explain why the leaks “were good for Israel,” as the Israeli prime minister put it.... Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a press conference that Israel had “worked in advance” to limit any damage from leaks, adding that “no classified Israeli material was exposed by WikiLeaks.” [6] In an interview with the Time magazine around the same time, Assange praised Netanyahu as a hero of transparency and openness! [7]

According to another report [8], a left-leaning Lebanese newspaper had met with Assange twice and tried to negotiate a deal with him, offering “a big amount of money”, in order to get hold of documents concerning the 2006 war, particularly the minutes of a meeting held at the American embassy in Beirut on 24th July 2006, which is widely considered as a 'war council' meeting between American, Israeli and Lebanese parties that played a role in the war again Hizbullah and its allies. The documents the Al-Akhbar editors received, however, all date to 2008 onwards and do not contain “anything of value,” the sources confirm. This only goes to support the Israel deal allegations.
Click to expand...
 
LOL 9/11 you DO believe every single thing you read on the internet if it supports your world view. Nice. Makes things simpler that way, doesn't it?
 
RedIbis said:
At least you answered a direct question with a direct answer. Did you follow the links? The wikileak contained a signed document from Hillary Clinton:
Click to expand...

So, one person? How unamazing.

RedIbis said:
If not indictments, you would certainly support an investigation into Zelikow's obstruction into investigating Saudi AQ financing links, no?
Click to expand...

Isn't she the Sec. of State now? Why hasn't she done something since then?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom