Oh, you guys are just impatient, that's all.
Oh look - this thread fell off the front page - Anita bumped it herself again, and still
we are somehow impatient? For what?
Anita seriously,
what exactly do you think we are impatient for?
We do not believe you will ever test yourself in a meaningful way. So how can we be impatient for something we have repeatedly explained we do not believe will ever happen (and look how right we are turning out to be)?
Why do
you keep bumping the thread when you
have not done a single thing towards testing the 'ability'?
To detail an entirely different and unrelated person with an actual ability to do something unusual? This doesn't relate to you at all.
You have not demonstrated the ability to do anything unusual whatsoever.
I am still working on my investigation, but school comes first. I have so far not produced a single verified incorrect medical perception, and the claim has not been falsified.
Allow me (this gets easier each time):
Ashles said:
He didn't have a tired left shoulder, so you were wrong.
You reported the "tired left shoulder" so it was significant enough to mention.
You did not write that you sensed an "adam's apple" so that is a lie. You wrote that you sensed throat discomfort. Which was wrong.
Every man has an adam's apple so your claim to have detected something that every healthy man is known to have, is stupid and demonstrates how blatantly you refuse to accept being wrong. This also shows how little point there is for anyone to even attempt to try and work wih you in developing a test protocol. There are of course loads of other reasons too.
I am happy to copy and paste that as many times as you are prepared to lie about the results of that incident.
One single reading so far in front of skeptics, two clear incorrect results.
Oh dear. Her continuing lies about this are doing her more harm than anything else. The tiniest shred of honesty would have given her a scrap of credibility i.e. admitting that her abilty might not be 100% after all but she still felt it was strong.
But no, Anita has to be perfect (the 4.0 average story was very interesting) and anything less than that has to be discarded. No matter how ludicrosly.
Remeber, it's only cut and paste for me so is there any point in continuing to attempt to rewrite the history that anyone can see is untrue, even on your own website?
I don't see why some of you argue otherwise.
A little thing we like to think of as 'reality'. You cannot
demand people accept that which is blatantly untrue.
I do realize the lack of documented and witnessed examples of my ability, but that is because it is hard to arrange for such tests.
No it isn't. Well it wouldn't be for any of us, for some reason it is impossible for you.
And this is still exams week, so it will be a few days until I can continue with the arrangements of the study.
Has it been exams week for a year and a half? Since you first tried to agree testing with IIG?
I am not trying to be special,
That's lucky because you have demonstrated nothing yet that implies you are.
I am simply describing my experience as it is.
You are making unverified claims. Which remain unverified claims.
I get all the sense of fulfillment I need from the people in my life and my education and science career.
You do love to aggrandise yourself don't you? You have no 'science career' yet - you are a student. The law students do not have 'law careers' and the journalism students are not journalists. That stuff all happens
after you graduate.
Your use of language rather disagrees with your claim "I am not trying to be special".
And let us list yet
again some things you could actually do at some point (even though some would take only a matter of minutes to do):
- Detail what happened in the Study on January 3rd (I think "eventually" has officially passed now) - A brief description of this would take less time than all the other meaningless posts you add
- Fax the notes of said study to the contact details Unca Yimmy provided some time ago - This would take very little time and yet you still have not done this and not even referred to it
- Run a test on identifying crystals (as you claimed you could do to an amazing degree) - Again you have ignored this completely although you said you would do this
- Provide the results of your analysis of Pup's pill experiment (even if the result are that you simply couldn't detect anything) - A brief description would take far less time than all the other meaningless posts you add
- Detail what exactly you wrote down regarding Wayne (providing a scan of your notes would be even better) - You have ignored this completely - It doesn't bode well for any future 'testing'
This is why we don't believe you when you claim to want to work towards testing. These are simple and mostly quick things to do which will provide more information, yet not only do you not do them, you
completely ignore them as though they might go away or get forgotten about.
That won't happen.