UncaYimmy:
You have repeatedly quoted very liberally and copiously from our earlier Facebook Chat and revealed plenty of things that I had said and you interpreted the context of what was said in your own manner.
I only dispute your use of the word "copiously." Our first few chats were well over an hour. No way did I come close to covering everything.
I use quotes where I feel your exact words are important. I rarely if ever quote a complete sentence. I agree that I "revealed plenty of things" but in the manner seen in this sentence. That's fair use. It's a balance between relaying the idea and providing quotes to justify my interpretation.
I posted our recent conversation as an attempt to provide an accurate representation of what was actually said.
You should have asked for permission, especially since I recently refused to chat with you, exchange e-mails, or talk to you on the phone, all of which
you requested. I also told everyone here what transpired between us in that regard.
For instance by quoting how I had claimed a possible Nobel prize for myself as if I had brought up the topic you introduced what we said in a manner that allowed plenty of misinterpretation. It was in fact you who brought up the topic that the paranormal claimant would not receive the Nobel prize at which I just said that I think it should go to the person with the ESP. I have been tolerant and overlooked plenty of cases where I felt that you had acted inappropriately with the private conversation that was between the two of us in our earliest conversations.
I think you need a timeout. It seems like you want to engage in bickering, which is frowned upon by the moderators because it is not productive or relevant. Suffice it to say you have initiated all of the chats. In fact about 500 posts ago you told everyone that perhaps I was ignoring you because almost a whole day passed without a response after your
repeated PMs asking me to join you in a chat.
During those chats I explored the boundaries and tested you. I felt I was being manipulated the whole time and responded in kind. I advised at least one other member of this via PM. I have publicly stated that there was some flirting going on. If you had any issues with my conduct, why would you continue to initiate chats with me even after I refused to chat with you last time?
Seriously. Drop it.
The fact that you could not simply tell me to delete the post of the conversation (since it is still open for me for editing or removal) and choose to report it is bad manner considering what was agreed between the two of us in advance.
I disagree about what you believe we "agreed" to.
You have turned to constant complaining and a very negative manner of expressing yourself. Your contributions here are no longer productive and you seem to be working against me and my investigation. And as of now I will not be reading your posts.
I have
never worked with you. I have repeatedly stated that the only reason you should be tested is to prove to you that you have no abilities. I think others will make up their own minds about my productivity in regards to your claims.
However, I
have changed my tactics, that much is true. I let you think you were taking me where you wanted me to go when in fact I didn't go anywhere I didn't want to. Unfortunately, that well is dry (you stopped responding in the moderated thread when things didn't go as you wanted). Now I have chosen to push things in a different direction. You don't like it - that much is obvious.
Feel free to put me on ignore. If you wish to argue over who is in the right regarding the public postings of our chat, send me a PM. I will respond. If you do it here, I will not. It is off-topic and will probably lead to bickering, which is something the Mods don't want.
