LTC8K6
Penultimate Amazing
I was going to offer to get a reading from another vedic astrologer and give it to ManLondon to see if he could tell me when I was born.
I was going to offer to get a reading from another vedic astrologer and give it to ManLondon to see if he could tell me when I was born.
Well that's a verifiable claim. Find 10 people whose exact time of birth is known and if the astrologer can tell the date and time of birth from the palm only, they get $1,000,000.I know in India, lots of people have this problem. But there is solution for this. If someone is not very about his or her birth time, then an experienced astrologer can look at the lines in palm. (Palmistry) and maybe ask few questions about life to get to the exact time. It is like Reverse Engineering.
Pity he left. I would have given him the birth dates for Prince Charles who is definitely not a skeptic or connected to any skeptic organisation. And his life is fairly well known, even his marital problems so that we should have no problem finding out if the predictions/descriptions were true.
Do you know the precise location and time of his birth? Otherwise, you are also asking for a flying car.
Birth Data
Birth Name: Charles, Prince of Wales
Birth Date: 11/14/1948 (Nov 14, 1948)
Birth Time: 21:14 (09:14 PM) GMT (+0:00)
Birth Place: London, England
Latitude / Longitude: 51 N 30 / 00 W 10
From an astrological site:
The trouble with using someone as well known as Chazza is that they might well recognise him from his date and place of birth. I see that you have linked to the info on an astrology site!Pity he left. I would have given him the birth dates for Prince Charles who is definitely not a skeptic or connected to any skeptic organisation. And his life is fairly well known, even his marital problems so that we should have no problem finding out if the predictions/descriptions were true.
http://www.considerations-mag.com/indic.htmCaroline, Princess of Monaco, see VIII: 1 & XI: 2. 1/23/1957 9:27 AM MET (08:27 UT) Monaco: 43N24 7E24
Show chart
Stefano Casiraghi, husband of Princess Caroline of Monaco, XI: 2. 9/8/1960 10:30 PM MET (21:30 UT) Milan, Italy: 45N28 9E12
Show chart
Fidel Castro, Cuban leader (Jakubowsky rectification), see X: 3. 8/13/1927 12:07 PM EST (17:07 UT), Mayari, Cuba: 20N41 75W42 text
...
1. How do you know that there is an astrologer? Maybe it is just a computer program putting together random lines. And we are not going to chase down the guy if he exists anyway.
ManLondon, I have met people who have used almost exactly the same words as you do when you say you believe in Vedic Astrology. But they have been referring to all sorts of charlatan antics: women's mag astrologers, casting runes, tarot cards, dangling needles and corks, phone psychics, you name it. All of these scams, all of them, are simply taking money from gullible people like yourself by means of confidence tricks. Vedic Astrology is no different.
The problem for you is that you have simply convinced yourself that it works, and you are only looking for verification here for what you believe! You are NOT actually looking for proof that it doesn't work, despite what you may say, because if you read your posts again you are actively rejecting all attempts to show you how simply and blindly you are being strung along by the nose. If you were looking for adequate and convincing proof of it not working, there is certainly ample evidence to be found, both here and elsewhere.
I only hope you haven't been paying people any money, or giving them your credit card numbers. Or if you have, I have a really nice bridge you might like to buy!!
And I never believed the Horoscope published in newpapers and mags.
There is no truth in it because you cant divide the whole population in 12 categories.
In Vedic astrology, every person gets his or her horoscope based on time and place of his birth (Time and Space is known parameter even in today's science to accuractly point towards an object.)
A person born 3 minutes later will have different horoscope.
The problem for you is that you have simply convinced yourself that it works, and you are only looking for verification here for what you believe! You are NOT actually looking for proof that it doesn't work, despite what you may say, because if you read your posts again you are actively rejecting all attempts to show you how simply and blindly you are being strung along by the nose. If you were looking for adequate and convincing proof of it not working, there is certainly ample evidence to be found, both here and elsewhere.