Gulliver Foyle
Philosopher
Maybe he thinks he's the new Pat MustardSo he's just learned about Margaret Thatcher.
Maybe he thinks he's the new Pat MustardSo he's just learned about Margaret Thatcher.
but only until he got bored with it, then he would want the whole mealYou could bribe the guy with a Burger King crown
Cartoonist should have stopped after the first line of the traditional conservative's goals. Oh, and also put scare quotes around limited.
Meh, it's what happens when you avoid giving something to one nazi by giving it to another.So Machado gave the noble piece prize coin to Dump. I'm half expecting him to strut around wearing it around his neck.
I predict it won't do her any good. In his mind, he deserved it, not her, and he's got it now. No need to even think about her again.So Machado gave the noble piece prize coin to Dump. I'm half expecting him to strut around wearing it around his neck.
I wouldn't bet on that. There are people here who defended Trump's previous Administration's corruption, such as Zig. It would be no surprise for partisan apologists like him, especially on the Right, to have defended the corruption in other Republican Administrations.Nobody cares that other presidents may have done something illegal, and nobody here has ever defended corruption of past presidents. We are talking about THIS administration.
Lyman: Every country in the western hemisphere does exist at our pleasure
He's going to wave it around at his next cabinet meeting so all his toadies can clap at him.
Exactly so. Trump's treasures are baubles; he doesn't care about earning them, only that he can flaunt them. (ETA) Thinking about it a little more, that could be said about his Presidency.Trump clearly thinks it is the actual Nobel Prize, not just the loan of a medal.
Pretty much the entirety of human history is about the victors resetting the clock to zero and enjoying the resources their ancestors got by murdering another group who got in their way of taking possession of them. As somebody once said, one death is a tragedy, a million is a statistic.I wouldn't bet on that. There are people here who defended Trump's previous Administration's corruption, such as Zig. It would be no surprise for partisan apologists like him, especially on the Right, to have defended the corruption in other Republican Administrations.
No. I'm not going to bother arguing that the shooting was justified. For my current purpose, it suffices to note that she was shot because she accelerated towards the agent. That was the cause. Whether you think that justified the shooting or not, it was still the reason. And that falsifies the lies that she was shot for being a Trump critic, or for being a liberal lesbian, or for being a bitch. Because those were the claims being made here, those were the lies being told, and that's what I objected to.Zig, if you really, really need to, you could explain the first shot, which went through the windscreen, as necessary for the agent to protect himself, ignoring the fact that he stepped into the way deliberately to better record with his phone.
More gaslight.No. I'm not going to bother arguing that the shooting was justified. For my current purpose, it suffices to note that she was shot because she accelerated towards the agent. That was the cause. Whether you think that justified the shooting or not, it was still the reason. And that falsifies the lies that she was shot for being a Trump critic, or for being a liberal lesbian, or for being a bitch. Because those were the claims being made here, those were the lies being told, and that's what I objected to.
No. I'm not going to bother arguing that the shooting was justified.
For my current purpose, it suffices to note that she was shot because she accelerated towards the agent. That was the cause.
