Rolfe
Adult human female
Here's more about the insurance aspect of the FA capitulation. Amazing what a top insurance KC can bring to the table.
So in your view, trans women are women?That was being widely trailed yesterday. There is much rejoicing.
I do wish they would stop this "transgender women" thing. They're transgender men. But it may take some time to purge the language of the nonsensical forms that have been introduced and imposed by the trans lobby.

This is absolutely beside the point. Lia Thomas’ times were way off the best women’s times. That is easy to verify. He would not win Olympic Hold medals. What the point is, he was denying women from competing for medals at college level, and winning medals unfairly.I suspect the smartcooky is doing what I am doing Rolfe, which is to use a combination of Google and Chat GPT to find out what the times were and when the events were. I very much doubt that an interest in Olympic swimming means that he keeps up with relatively minor meets as the Zippy Invitational (for disclosure I asked Chat GPT if it is a prestigious event. It is not).
What was pointed out is that the Zippy event did indeed astonish a lot of people because of the very long distance between first and second in the one mile race. A time of 38 seconds more. This must be the race you were referring to when you said Thomas could have showered and changed before the next competitor even arrived.
So, does this mean that all the other races were thrown or deliberately laboured as "any top level swimmer" will tell you?
Not necessarily. According to Chat GPT, Thomas's time in the 1650 yrds of 15.59.71 was way off the eventual NCAA finals:
View attachment 60520

I know what the point is and I have said repeatedly that I agree with those points. But that doesn’t excuse us from making things up.This is absolutely beside the point. Lia Thomas’ times were way off the best women’s times. That is easy to verify. He would not win Olympic Hold medals. What the point is, he was denying women from competing for medals at college level, and winning medals unfairly.
The other point you should be aware of is that he would never have won any medals competing against men.
It was surely obvious even before he started this grift that the women's times were so much poorer than the men's, than what he was capable of, that he would have to take it easy. But he really went for it in that race. Three-quarters of a length!
To set a record that would never be broken?
It was a college meeting. I'm not au fait with what was going on in respect of records, but maybe @smartcooky will know.

Indeed. Its is never the point that a transwoman might not push the times in elite level competitions. Those in the pro-trans crowd are desperate to push this as not being an issue at lower levels. They couldn't be more wrong... in fact the presence of transwomen in women's sport is more damaging to participants at lower levels. Every transwoman (i.e. biological MALE) who is allowed to compete in women's competitions, blocks the advancement pathways for women.This is absolutely beside the point. Lia Thomas’ times were way off the best women’s times. That is easy to verify. He would not win Olympic Hold medals. What the point is, he was denying women from competing for medals at college level, and winning medals unfairly.
The other point you should be aware of is that he would never have won any medals competing against men.
Right, so why spend so much time making an argument that is patently false?Indeed. Its is never the point that a transwoman might not push the times in elite level competitions. Those in the pro-trans crowd are desperate to push this as not being an issue at lower levels. They couldn't be more wrong... in fact the presence of transwomen in women's sport is more damaging to participants at lower levels. Every transwoman (i.e. biological MALE) who is allowed to compete in women's competitions, blocks the advancement pathways for women.
In many indivudal sports, particularly professional ones, invitations to tournaments and competitions are based on rankings, and "cuts" (like a cut in a golf tournament where only the top 64 after Thursday and Friday, go on to play the weekend). Every transwoman in the rankings, pushes a woman down the rankings.... if the cut line is, say, 100, and you have 5 transwomen in the top 100, the five women who would have been ranked 96 to 100 are pushed back to below the cut line, and they miss playing at tournaments that would earn them their income. They are financially disadvantaged by the presence of those transwoman.
Allowing transwomen to compete in women's sporting competititons amounts to officially permitted cheating!
The mere fact that Thomas was even competing in the 50 meter AND the 1650 meter events is in itself remarkable.This is not in evidence.
In the one mile, I have already posted the winning swim of that year in the one mile (which was the event in which Thomas won by 38 seconds). The winner, Paige McKenna swam almost twenty seconds faster than Thomas, and another six or seven swimmers in the same race beat that Zippy Invitational time.
And that was far from the record, let alone a “record that would never be broken”.
Not my claim. I have not said men should compete against women. I have explicitly said they should not.The mere fact that Thomas was even competing in the 50 meter AND the 1650 meter events is in itself remarkable.
One mile in swimming is long distance. The fact that Usain Bolt might run a slower marathon than the women marathon runners is not evidence that men don’t have an unfair advantage, or that Bolt should be allowed to compete against women.
How about this?Plus, you got the comparison wrong. Ledecky’s record is for the 1500 meter event. 1500 meters is noticeably less than a mile. You cannot compare 1500 meters event times to 1 mile events. The fact that Ledecke swam 1500 meters in 15:25.48 while Thomas swam 1650 in 15:59.41 isn’t proof that Ledecke is faster, because that’s a SLOWER rate given the 10% longer distance they swim. If Ledecke kept her same pace, she would have swam 1650 in about 16:58, almost a minute slower. And assuming the same pace for a longer race is generous to Ledecke.
Doesn’t matter. It doesn’t apply in the pool, apparently, only in open water swims such as a triathlon.When I was at school a mile was 1760 yards.
WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY “MILE?”
Outside the water, the distance denoted by the term “mile” doesn’t change. Everywhere you go on dry land, a mile is a mile: 5,280 feet, 1,760 yards, or 1,609 meters. In the pool, though—especially if you’re racing—things aren’t quite as cut and dry as they are on dry land.
Racers who complete the “mile” race in the pool are actually only swimming 1,500 meters, or 1,650 yards. This length, also known as the “metric mile,” has long been a standard of competitive swimming, first being included in the Olympics in 1908. However, in the United States, one of the few countries that still uses the imperial measurement system, a mile still refers to the longer distance of 1,609 meters. This means that, if you’re in the US and taking part in an event like a triathlon, this is the mile-length you’ll need to train for.
Who has said that in this forum? I don’t think I’ve seen that.Others on here insisting that Thomas swims faster than any woman ever has or could and so resorted to pretending to be slower are just wrong.
![]()
Ledecky Wins 1650 By a Minute, Breaks American, NCAA Records at OSU
2016 OHIO STATE INVITATIONAL Live results Meet info Hosted by Ohio State University Friday, November 18th-Sunday, November 20th 25 yards Invite format Oneswimswam.com
It was and still is.When I was at school a mile was 1760 yards.