• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Too liberal?

Beerina said:
[qimg]http://i284.photobucket.com/albums/ll38/Gnurl/korea-by-night.jpg[/qimg]


I exaggerate, but not by much, especially as the decades go by.

Of course, this touts Conservatism only insofar as they support capitalism. In other ways, they have their own severe problems.
Click to expand...

The insanity that is the DPRK is not liberalism. It's not conservatism either. It's what happens when the head of state becomes a God and the people are deeply brainwashed into loving him because he rose from the sea and beat up the Japanese during WWII. The DPRK is ******* insane.

Why? Because they took how communism actually works in the real world and then tetrated it by the size of the universe.

Regular Communism

Communism: We love you workers!
Workers: Y... you do? But no one loves us!
Communism: No, we totally love you and you're the best thing ever and I'm going to make things great for you because you deserve it!
Workers: Yay! Thanks Communism! Hey wait, a second?
Communism looks up from stuffing its face with the workers' labor.
Workers: My life is sucking even more now. I'm right where I was and I can't do anything about it.
Communism: Hey, you're sounding suspiciously like an evil capitalist!
Workers: ...
Communism: Where was I?
Workers: **** you.
Workers dick punch Communism

DPRK WTF Communism

Communism: We love you workers!
Workers: Y... you do? But no one loves us!
Communism: No, we totally love you and you're the best thing ever and I'm going to make things great for you because you deserve it!
Workers: Yay! Thanks Communism!
Communism pauses from stuffing its face with the workers' labor: I'm pretty awesome aren't I?
Workers: Yeah!
Communism: Check out my main man, Kim Il Sung. Isn't he great? He was totally given to us by heaven and created the world!
Workers: Oooh...
Communism: And his son is just as awesome! Hey, you guys want our own Godzilla movie but without any evil capitalism?
Workers: Yay! Even though I'm starving and overworked and my life is complete and utter ****, I'm super happy to see Dear Leader get his very own Godzilla movie!
Communism: Let's build a great tower to show the world how awe... Nah, forget it.
Workers: Forget what? There's no half-built tower in our capital at all!
Communism: I love you guys. You're the best. You and nuclear weapons.
South Korea plays Starcraft.

I will give Communism this: At least when they're ****ing over the workers, they're faithful. A lot of capitalist manufacturers **** over their workers while saying that they love them and then leave them for workers in another country to **** over. Still, it's not liberalism or conservatism, it's just ****.
 
Meadmaker said:
I was going to make a response, but I decided it wasn't sufficiently on topic. I invite you to discuss the ideas of liberty, equality, and the ways in which they might clash, in the thread "Liberty, Equality, Moose."
Click to expand...

You omitted the wombats. Silly ape.
 
makaya325 said:
So Obama is not really a full blown liberal? Then why does he reject sending more Troops to Afghanistan?
Click to expand...
1. He already sent more troops there. (4,000 was the first installment).
2. What he's mulling over is sending even more since the recommendation/request from General McChrystal came in.
3. Your question borders on non sequitur, but then, I remembered who was posting.

For a little background.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/216237

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=157603
 
Darth Rotor said:
1. He already sent more troops there. (4,000 was the first installment).
2. What he's mulling over is sending even more since the recommendation/request from General McChrystal came in.
3. Your question borders on non sequitur, but then, I remembered who was posting.

For a little background.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/216237

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=157603
Click to expand...

He sent troops, only to make America happy. Maybe it is time for him to stop kissing the General Public's ***, and start making decisions based on his real political beliefs
 
makaya325 said:
He sent troops, only to make America happy. Maybe it is time for him to stop kissing the General Public's ***, and start making decisions based on his real political beliefs
Click to expand...

What makes you think you know what those are?
 
makaya325 said:
He sent troops, only to make America happy. Maybe it is time for him to stop kissing the General Public's ***, and start making decisions based on his real political beliefs
Click to expand...

Ah, the Sylvia Brown school of politics. Rush Limbaugh is a fan too.
 
makaya325 said:
He sent troops, only to make America happy. Maybe it is time for him to stop kissing the General Public's ***, and start making decisions based on his real political beliefs
Click to expand...

McChrystal, not Public's Ass.

Afghanistan isn't about liberal or conservative either. It's about ****ing Al-Qaeda Up, which is something we should have done by about four or five years ago and failed to do because it was mismanaged.

Afghanistan has been noted as a suck-ass place to fight with its rough topology. Somehow, we thought we could handle that and Iraq. It didn't quite work.
 
I would say that on some issues I come in as liberal, in other areas I come in as conservative.
 
Is this a big joke to you, DR? I admit that I am lacking Knowledge in politics, so I came here to discuss it.
 
makaya325 said:
Is this a big joke to you, DR? I admit that I am lacking Knowledge in politics, so I came here to discuss it.
Click to expand...

I was giving you credit for humility, :) and for understanding the first step on the path to wisdom. If it came off snarky, that's probably due to my normally giving you a poke in the eye.
 
leftysergeant said:
ALF drops off the scale of rational political discussion. PETA is sort of within shouting distance of reality, and probably comes closest to beign a liberal organization. If the right wing wants us to own PETA and ALF, they will have to take National Vanguard.

Obama is disappointingly centrist, so far, and not going all-out to restore the damage that the Shrub did to the New Deal institutions and infrastructure.
Click to expand...


Too Liberal ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^:whistling
 
makaya325 said:
I am aware that it is quite illogical to side with hardcore Conservatives on Social issues, but is there such a thing as being "too Liberal"? Along with a couple of other questions people should ask themselves.

-Has anybody here ever been labeled to be "too liberal"?

-Is it bad to be "too liberal"?, just like being "too skinny", "too big", etc.

- What would America be like if our society was fully Liberal, and Conservatism did not exist?

- Are there any issues that Liberals make the wrong decision on? Do you disagree with some of their Ideas?
Click to expand...

You need more dog in your diet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom