Chris_Halkides
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2009
- Messages
- 12,559
Dr. Steven Novella at Science-based Medicine wrote, "But to dig one level deeper – part of his problem is that he confuses hazard for risk. Medicine functions optimally when it is explicitly founded on a science-based risk vs benefit analysis. For each intervention, what is the net effect on the health outcomes of the patient? What is the benefit of the intervention vs the side effects and other risks? This should make obvious sense. Hazard is the mere potential for harm, without any consideration for the probability of harm. The analogy I favor is the notion of a shark at an aquarium in a tank. That shark is certainly a hazard, but as long as it remains in the tank and you remain outside the tank, the risk is very low. What RFK is doing is the equivalent of not driving to the hospital to be evaluated and potentially treated for an acute life-threatening disease because you are afraid of getting into an accident on the way there."
