You can't exactly wait until after the police do something wrong to start your camera.
Ah, so you live in a state of constant paranoia that every police officer is just itching to jump on some poor innocent member of the public and beat them to death?
I don't see why there is the continued anticipation that they
will do something wrong, and should therefore have every second of their job taped. And, I disagree anyway. It doesn't take long to get a camera going, particularly if you already have it out and are waiting with baited breath for something to 'kick off'. And my point here was that these police officers don't actually seem to be
doing anything wrong.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not a fan of police officers, having had a few very negative encounters. But, I disagree with this style of harrassing someone in the process of doing their job. I also agree with a previous comment, that the police are dealign with either witnesses or perpetrators. Those people are entitled to their privacy and anonymity, and I believe it's illegal for their faces, etc to be shown without express permission.
All I'm saying is that videotaping the police shouldn't bother them if they are doing no wrong. And if they are doing wrong it serves as a deterrent.
What harm is there videotaping them doing their job properly?
Would it bother you? And, I'm not just talking about a camera setup somewhere near your desk, or wherever you work. How about a manually operated camera, with an operator who throws out the odd snarky comment about
how you are doing your job. That would be ok with you?
Police officers are human, and therefore entitled to a decent work environment, and in view of the rest of the environment they often have to work in, I think privacy is a perk they deserve. Yes, they should be exposed if they do wrong. These guys weren't doing wrong.