• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

the new normal?, toward a "Psychocivilized" Society?, our "Brave New World"? ...

@rlopez2: I don't think anyone finds your post intellectually challenging, as you so condescendingly surmise. It's a garbled train wreck. Pick your points to discuss, and keep them short and clear. Clear. In a paragraph or so, what do you want to discuss?
 
Hellbound said:
I don't think they're on speaking terms.
Click to expand...

I think they are exchanging gunfire as we speak.

I worked with foreign student (non native English speakers) for decades - I wonder what his native tongue is?
 
I honestly, seriously, and with no snark do wonder sometimes; do people who talk in word salad not know they are talking in word salad?
 
Hans said:
I think they are exchanging gunfire as we speak.

I worked with foreign student (non native English speakers) for decades - I wonder what his native tongue is?
Click to expand...

He used the word "gringos" (non-hispanics) a few times so, native language Spanish probably. I did not read the whole garbled mess but just noticed that word used.
 
rlopez2 said:
I told them I hadn't had any kind of skin-to-skin contact with any other living thing.
Click to expand...


At first, I thought that you might be an AI, but since you write "other (!) living thing", I guess you must either have been a test-tube baby or from your mother's womb untimely ripped.
 
for those interested in knowing what the deal with targeted individuals is about ...

OK, for those people interested in knowing what the deal with "targeted individuals" is about (instead of the sophistication of the English languages, "proper" language usage, ...), who may run into this thread you should search on:

"ipsoscustodes.wordpress.com" 2018/03/09 "unity-et-hope-et-laura-yan"

"ipsoscustodes.wordpress.com" 2017/06/15 "main-individual-targeting-us"

"ipsoscustodes.wordpress.com" 2017/07/27
"technical-what-how-why-of-targeted-individuals-political_persecution_us"

"ipsoscustodes.wordpress.com" 2017/07/27
"social-what-how-why-of-targeted-individuals-political_persecution_us"

"ipsoscustodes.wordpress.com" 2017/06/15 "well-known-targeted-individual-us"
~
those were drafts of a wikipedia pages we were trying to publish, but the reaction of wikipedians was like this one (and worse):

en wikipedia wiki Talk:Microwave_auditory_effect "Conspiracy theories"

and I have avoided adjectives here.
~
rlopez2
 
Try posing it to the forum in such a way that it seems coherent. No one is interested in doing random research.
 
RE: @rlopez2: I don't think anyone finds your post intellectually challenging . . .

One of the most interesting part of your (group "you" here) reactions (and no I don't care about ad hominem non sense) is the mind reading aspect of them, yet, you can't even see my not "condescending", but -sarcastic- reaction was due to your demands for "brevity", "conciseness", . . .

"Please, could you dumb down for me 'whatever the point is'?" . . .

Let me make it "brief" and "concise" enough for the metabolism of your brains:

"yes, we can!"

Now wasn't that much, much better!?!

"Normalcy bias" (and here I am not trying to sound like some crazy big **** is about to happen, but more like in a "you see what you know" kind of way) is one of the most interesting kinds of psychological reactions. I have observed the reactions of people after they have realized that I was talking about was true. I don't really care about something sounding implausible or not, all I care about is if it is falsifiable?

The best thing about it all is that people reading this now and in the future will make their own conclusions about both your "skepticism", "super brain powers", "language usage skills", . . . and my "conspiratory" rants.

rlopez2
 
rlopez2 said:
RE: @rlopez2: I don't think anyone finds your post intellectually challenging . . .

One of the most interesting part of your (group "you" here) reactions (and no I don't care about ad hominem non sense) is the mind reading aspect of them, yet, you can't even see my not "condescending", but -sarcastic- reaction was due to your demands for "brevity", "conciseness", . . .

"Please, could you dumb down for me 'whatever the point is'?" . . .

Let me make it "brief" and "concise" enough for the metabolism of your brains:

"yes, we can!"

Now wasn't that much, much better!?!

"Normalcy bias" (and here I am not trying to sound like some crazy big **** is about to happen, but more like in a "you see what you know" kind of way) is one of the most interesting kinds of psychological reactions. I have observed the reactions of people after they have realized that I was talking about was true. I don't really care about something sounding implausible or not, all I care about is if it is falsifiable?

The best thing about it all is that people reading this now and in the future will make their own conclusions about both your "skepticism", "super brain powers", "language usage skills", . . . and my "conspiratory" rants.

rlopez2
Click to expand...

Please note how I conveniently hit the quote button for clarity as a courtesy to readers.

Rlopez2, no one is asking you to dumb anything down. I am sure you will find very substantial responses, should you post in a way that makes sense. It is hard to read your own words as if someone else was reading them, but please try. From this end, it reads very garbled. I'm sure you think your points are made clearly, but as you should be able to gauge from the responses, they are not.

And I explained how to use the quote feature. It's really simple. Give it a try.
 
Something else that I find suspect is that wikipedia has quite long and elaborate entries about: UFOs, Illuminati, Satanism, "white" supremacy, flat earth, ... and all kinds of unimaginable nonsense, but when you try to talk about MKUltra 2.0 they go: No, ******, no! Even if one after the other all the things many TIs have been talking about turned out to be true.

I don't believe in "alternate facts". I may not be the best person to explain such matters and I don't even know if there is a "brief" and "concise" way to explain them, but there are new very wrong "social control" developments happening and we are all engulfed in it.

People should open their eyes to where they are being driven. At the very least they should have the right to know

rlopez2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ahh! Targeted Individuals! The only way to have 200% of the work force fully employed spying on insignificant people.
 
rlopez2 said:
I may not be the best person to explain such matters and I don't even know if there is a "brief" and "concise" way to explain them,
Click to expand...

Snipped for brevity.

Then you don't really understand what you're talking about. Being brief and concise isn't dumbing down what you're talking about, in fact it's the opposite. Summation is actually an intelligent way to introduce ideas into a discussion, especially a new discussion or different point of view. Then, when further pressed you can go into more detail about a certain aspect. But identifying the key statements and points of your topic is actually a very intelligent way to discuss things. Especially on the internet. No one has time to read a page long post. If you can't succinctly summarize your points then you're just rambling.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom