Against my better judgement but...
Nolan Coppenger said:
Our experiments were conducted in a wonderfully appointed new home in Pleasant Hill. Lanford had insisted upon a quiet venue;
Why??
Nolan Coppenger said:
we consulted our guides and an address was revealed to us.
Who were the guides? Who appointed them? Were they known to Lanford before hand? How do you know?
Nolan Coppenger said:
On investigating, we discovered that the address was a newer home which the owners had just put on the rental market. Needless to say our little committee quickly made arrangements to see the house with Lanford in tow. Lanford was quite happy with the house and the matter was settled.
This suggests the ability is location specific, why do you think this may be? Or is it a case that he needs to pre-vet the place to ensure that his "method" will work?
Nolan Coppenger said:
We rented the house for a period of six weeks.
Again - this seems an excessive period, but never mind
Nolan Coppenger said:
The first two weeks were spent attuning the house and generally cleansing it of any negative energies. Although it was a relatively new home people had been living in it and precautions needed to be taken in order to provide a neutral environment for the experiments.
How were the energies tested, before and after? Was everybody in agreement that there were negative energies? Who "cleaned" them out? Who was in attendance or observing while this occured?
Nolan Coppenger said:
We were guided to focus on the dining room as the proper setting for testing.
Who guided you to the dining room? Why do you think that was? Is there anything about the dining room that may facilitate this trick?
Nolan Coppenger said:
All plants and floor lamps were removed as well as extra furniture, leaving only the dining room table and chairs. As you can see, the result was somewhat Spartan, but that had been our goal.
Seems a lot of work to go to to create a spartan feel, why not just locate an empyt warehouse that was neer lived in. All of this stinks of set-up and trickery to me.
Nolan Coppenger said:
Experimental Preparation
At last we were ready to test Lanford. Keeping in mind that many people do not believe in the special abilities we all practice, we took steps to assure that our tests would be as thorough as possible giving Lanford no chance to cheat.
So far you have failed miserably - I have little confidence the damage has not already been done.
Nolan Coppenger said:
As you know, we test everyone who is invited to join our society and Lanford was no exception. Given the nature of these abilities we always take careful precautions to prevent psychic access or even physical access to test materials.
How were they physically protected? How were they psychically protected?
Nolan Coppenger said:
Keys to the house and the test materials were kept in a safe deposit box. Only two of us had access to the safe deposit box. Both were required to be present when the other opened the box. The bank had been instructed to refuse access to either person if the other person was not present.
Big deal - lock picking is no great secret. This was over complication without actually solving the root problem. Who remained at the building to guard it? Was there internal and external CCTV footage over night etc to ensure no tampering?
Nolan Coppenger said:
We set out the materials the night before Lanford was to arrive. These materials were:
The materials
Two new decks of playing cards.
10 opaque black envelopes.
10 rectangular plates of 1/4†thick steel.
Digital video recorder.
Digital camera.
Who said to set up the night before? If Lanford then I see a big hole in the protocol, if you suggested it then you have just providd him with a hole.
Nolan Coppenger said:
We set up the digital video recorder and the digital camera. Each stage of the preparation was photographed in order to preserve a record of the procedure which we could check for any sleight of hand. We are all trustworthy but having a truly impartial watchful eye in the form of technology helps to keep everyone careful of details.
Assuming you actually saw the slight of hand and took a photograph of it. Seeing as most experts in this field can do it under your nose, what makes you think you would atch it on film?
Nolan Coppenger said:
Why? At whose request? Were the blinds checked before they were closed and after for holes etc that somebody could see through from outside?
Nolan Coppenger said:
we thoroughly shuffled one deck of cards, leaving the other deck sealed and unopened. Each playing card was placed in one opaque black envelope. These envelopes were then shuffled. Ten envelopes were selected at random. Each envelope was placed in a row on the dining room table. Each envelope was then covered by one steel plate. At this time we turned off the digital video recorder, taking it and the digital camera with us when we left the room, which we locked behind us. The digital video recorder and the digital camera were taken to the bank and locked in the safe deposit box.
Why was the video not left running once the experiment was set up?? You must have the video running continuously, everything after this point is now invalid.
Nolan Coppenger said:
In the morning all of us were anxious for Lanford's arrival.
Why?? He probably already knows what the cards are.
Nolan Coppenger said:
Our lieutenants retrieved the digital video recorder and digital camera from the safe deposit box and we all met at the house. There we unlocked the dining room and found that nothing had been disturbed.
What measures were in place to ensure things were not disturbed or were you relyign on looking at a digital photo and comparing? What was to stop somebody breaking in over night, taking photos, looking what the cards were and then using the photos to put it all back. Why was there no CCTV or Guards (big hole), in fact, why was the setup and experiment not one continual process?
Nolan Coppenger said:
No sooner had we set up the digital video recorder and digital camera than Lanford knocked on the front door of the house. He apologized for his early arrival but said that he'd had “the jitters†and wanted to get started as soon as possible. Fortunately we were ready for him to begin. We all entered the dining room where the tests would soon begin.
Lanford was given the sealed, unopened deck of playing cards. His task was to discern the playing card hidden below each steel plate and select its duplicate from the unopened deck and place it face up above each plate.
Asmentioned - I suspect he already knows at this point, so the rest is just presentation of the pay-off.
Nolan Coppenger said:
Lanford selects the cards
One by one, Lanford examined each place without touching anything except the deck of cards in his hands. Slowly selecting each card in turn, Lanford stopped at each plate and placed a card at each position until all ten plates had a card.
Could he have done this blindfolded and called out the card details as he passed each one?? Just wondering!
Nolan Coppenger said:
In keeping with our agreements, Lanford then left with one of our committee, who drove him to another location while we examined the results.
The Results
Here are the incredible results of the first experiment:
Plate 1: Queen of Diamonds Lanford: Queen of Diamonds
Plate 2: Five of Clubs Lanford: Four of Clubs
Plate 3: Ace of Diamonds Lanford: Ace of Diamonds
Plate 4: Eight of Spades Lanford: Eight of Spades
Plate 5: Jack of Hearts Lanford: Jack of Hearts
Plate 6: Six of Hearts Lanford: Four of Hearts
Plate 7: Ten of Clubs Lanford: Ten of Clubs
Plate 8: Joker Lanford: Joker
Plate 9: Seven of Diamonds Lanford: Seven of Hearts
Plate 10: King of Spades Lanford: King of Spades
Who collated the results and how? Plenty of scope for things to be "fudged" at this point.
Nolan Coppenger said:
Seven clear hits out of ten, with three very close hits, close enough to be virtually identical. When asked how he was able to “see†the hidden cards, Lanford told us that when he concentrates, “the metal just turns to glassâ€. When we asked him how he could see through the opaque envelopes, Lanford said, “I didn't notice envelopes at all.†We asked Lanford why there had been three misses, even though the cards he had chosen were extremely similar to the originals. According to Lanford, “Sometimes there's interference. If I get negative energies the glass effects get cloudy, you know, as if someone breathed on it and fogged the glass.â€
We repeated the experiment once each day for the remaining four weeks. As you can see in this graph, Lanford's hit rate remained consistently high throughout the test period, at times hitting 10 for 10.
This chart shows Lanford's scores
Judging by the gaping holes in the protocol I am not surprised he was able to pull this off repeatedly.
Nolan Coppenger said:
Summary
We feel the results of these tests are truly astounding.
Really?? I am unimpressed. The protocol was too complex, leaving it wide open to abuse, it may not have been properly double blinded and the result taking process may well be suspect. This could be done much more simply, with better anti-trickery measures, in a much shorter period of time and I suspect with rather different results.